d Xu
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Wemm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "FreeBSD current users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 3:52 AM
Subject: Re: status of KSE merge
> Julian Elischer wrote
Julian Elischer wrote:
> At this time I have no information on any apps that fail to work (that did
> work before KSE).
>
> The signal flakiness is still present but at least people can get work
> done. I will work on this next (though signal experts are welcome to
> try their hand as well.. (in
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001, David Xu wrote:
> I know KSE is not related to SMP and will run on UP. my primary
> idea is want to run parellel I/O task in same process with pthread,
> simply because FreeBSD pthread does not allow me to do multipile
> I/O tasks at same time on disk file, of course, it is
Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:59:24PM +0800, David Xu wrote:
> > Hello Julian,
> >
> > Friday, March 16, 2001, 12:18:15 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > JE> David Xu wrote:
> > >>
> > >>I wonder status of KSE, I am dreaming rewrite our application
> > >> server using kqueue+pthre
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:59:24PM +0800, David Xu wrote:
> Hello Julian,
>
> Friday, March 16, 2001, 12:18:15 PM, you wrote:
>
> JE> David Xu wrote:
> >>
> >>I wonder status of KSE, I am dreaming rewrite our application
> >> server using kqueue+pthread(KSE), current, we use poll()+pthread
David Xu wrote:
>
>I wonder status of KSE, I am dreaming rewrite our application
> server using kqueue+pthread(KSE), current, we use poll()+pthread
> because pthread does not work with kqueue at present.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> David Xu
KSE is not into coding yet.
we have a basic design an
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
> I wonder status of KSE, I am dreaming rewrite our application
>server using kqueue+pthread(KSE), current, we use poll()+pthread
>because pthread does not work with kqueue at present.
That's news to me. kqueue + libc_r should work fine in -stable, AF
