Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 03:41:14AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > If you can get gcc and binutils to add the necessary support, then
> > > we can talk further. Until then it's academic.
> >
> > I think there are political reasons for not doing this. The
> > number one
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 03:41:14AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > If you can get gcc and binutils to add the necessary support, then
> > we can talk further. Until then it's academic.
>
> I think there are political reasons for not doing this. The
> number one reason would be that you could loa
Terry Lambert writes:
> > I've looked without much success. Could you give a timeframe, a subject
> > and/or something?
>
> Note that the part you snipped indicated that the patches were
> posted by a third party, and that my own patches had been offered,
> but were not posted in their entirety to
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > Ether way, you still need to deal with the linker changes necessary
> > to export the symbol set for all statically linked objects, and to
> > force the inclusion of all archive members when statically linking,
> > if one of the linked libraries is libdl, if you wanted a
Mark Murray wrote:
> Terry Lambert writes:
> > Since I have patches to make dlopen work with static binaries, and
> [ snip ]
> > As to inevitable "where are the patches?", please check the -current
> > list archives, you will find at least one set there.
>
> I've looked without much success. Could
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 04:16:06AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> >
> > Dynamic linking works because the kernel loads and runs the dynamic
> > linker when it sees that the executable defines an interpeter.
>
> Since I have patches to make dlopen work with static binaries, and
> it doesn't work th
Terry Lambert writes:
> Since I have patches to make dlopen work with static binaries, and
:
[ snip ]
:
> As to inevitable "where are the patches?", please check the -current
> list archives, you will find at least one set there.
I've looked without much success. Could you give a timeframe, a subj
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 05:44:18PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > "E.B. Dreger" wrote:
> > > Dynamic linking works by the kernel running the dynamic linker,
> > > which loads shared objects and fixes the symbol tables, yes?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > Dynamic linking works becaus
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 05:44:18PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "E.B. Dreger" wrote:
> > After watching the recent shared/dynamic threads, and reading the
> > archives from five or six years ago, I have a question...
> >
> > Dynamic linking works by the kernel running the dynamic linker,
> > whic
"E.B. Dreger" wrote:
> After watching the recent shared/dynamic threads, and reading the
> archives from five or six years ago, I have a question...
>
> Dynamic linking works by the kernel running the dynamic linker,
> which loads shared objects and fixes the symbol tables, yes?
No.
Dynamic link
After watching the recent shared/dynamic threads, and reading the
archives from five or six years ago, I have a question...
Dynamic linking works by the kernel running the dynamic linker,
which loads shared objects and fixes the symbol tables, yes? Is
there some reason that a statically-linked pr
11 matches
Mail list logo
