Re: /usr/local misuse (Was: Confusing error messages from shell image activation)

2000-12-10 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:40:31PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > > I always thought ``make PREFIX=/tmp/foo package'' is pretty obvious.. but ... > What does the above command do if the port isn't PREFIX clean? Installs the ports's bits into [most likely] /usr/local, cause an error while trying to b

Re: /usr/local misuse (Was: Confusing error messages from shell image activation)

2000-12-10 Thread Mike Meyer
Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Meyer writes: > : I know. Unfortunately, support for PREFIX seems to draw more lip > : service than actual service. > Actually, which ports, specically, doesn't this work with? I've > installed several ports with PREFIX

Re: /usr/local misuse (Was: Confusing error messages from shell image activation)

2000-12-10 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Meyer writes: : I know. Unfortunately, support for PREFIX seems to draw more lip : service than actual service. Actually, which ports, specically, doesn't this work with? I've installed several ports with PREFIX defined to something odd and have had minimal pr

Re: /usr/local misuse (Was: Confusing error messages from shell image activation)

2000-12-09 Thread Mike Meyer
David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 01:59:51PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > > I know. Unfortunately, support for PREFIX seems to draw more lip > > service than actual service. > I disagree. If one of the ports I maintain isn't PREFIX-clean, let me > know and it _will_

Re: /usr/local misuse (Was: Confusing error messages from shell image activation)

2000-12-09 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 01:59:51PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > I know. Unfortunately, support for PREFIX seems to draw more lip > service than actual service. I disagree. If one of the ports I maintain isn't PREFIX-clean, let me know and it _will_ be fixed. If you know others, please open a PR,

/usr/local misuse (Was: Confusing error messages from shell image activation)

2000-12-09 Thread Mike Meyer
Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 08:21:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Agreed. It would be nice if FreeBSD could use the same system as NetBSD, > > storing the packages/ports under /usr/pkg. > That's why PREFIX exists. I know. Unfortunately, support for P