On 07.10.2013 19:09, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, October 06, 2013 3:30:42 am Alexander Motin wrote:
On 02.10.2013 20:30, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, September 07, 2013 2:32:45 am Alexander Motin wrote:
On 07.09.2013 02:02, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300
On Sunday, October 06, 2013 3:30:42 am Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 02.10.2013 20:30, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 07, 2013 2:32:45 am Alexander Motin wrote:
> >> On 07.09.2013 02:02, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >>>
On 02.10.2013 20:30, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, September 07, 2013 2:32:45 am Alexander Motin wrote:
On 07.09.2013 02:02, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 06.09.2013 11:06, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:46:27AM
On Saturday, September 07, 2013 2:32:45 am Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 07.09.2013 02:02, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >> On 06.09.2013 11:06, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:46:27AM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé w
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:48:38PM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
> > Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
> > theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to
> > help further it
Alexander Motin wrote:
> I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
> improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
> see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch
> against present head (r255131) can be found here:
>
On 07.09.2013 02:02, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 06.09.2013 11:06, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:46:27AM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
I've found and
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 06.09.2013 11:06, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:46:27AM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >>> I've found and fixed possible double request c
On 06.09.2013 11:06, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:46:27AM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
I've found and fixed possible double request completion, that could cause
such symptoms if happened. Updated patch located a
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:46:27AM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > I've found and fixed possible double request completion, that could cause
> > such symptoms if happened. Updated patch located as usual:
> > http://people.freebsd.or
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> I've found and fixed possible double request completion, that could cause
> such symptoms if happened. Updated patch located as usual:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/camlock_patches/camlock_20130905.patch
>
Good catch!
this new patch (ap
On 04.09.2013 19:31, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
- HP EliteBook 8460p (amd64: r255188) with DVD replaced by a second
hardrive (where fbsd is installed): It crash just after the message
"GEOM: new disk ada1" during boot
screenshot of the
On 09/04/13 11:00, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:11:28 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do
the
porting work?
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
>
>> - HP EliteBook 8460p (amd64: r255188) with DVD replaced by a second
>> hardrive (where fbsd is installed): It crash just after the message
>> "GEOM: new disk ada1" during boot
>>
>> screenshot of the crash screen:
>> http://goo.gl/tW1VIx
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:11:28 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
> >> Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do
the
> >> porting work?
> >> -Nathan
> > #define GET_
On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do the
porting work?
-Nathan
#define GET_STACK_USAGE(total, used)
GET_STACK_USAGE sets the variable passed in total to the total amo
On 04.09.2013 15:45, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 09/04/13 02:01, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 04.09.2013 00:48, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo
wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres positive input i have a z
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do the
> porting work?
> -Nathan
#define GET_STACK_USAGE(total, used)
GET_STACK_USAGE sets the variable passed in total to the total amount
of stack space available to th
On 09/04/13 02:01, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 04.09.2013 00:48, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo
wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it
on, to
he
On 04.09.2013 11:20, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Alexander Motin wrote:
I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch
against present hea
Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch
against present head (r255131) can be found here:
http
On 04.09.2013 00:48, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to
help further it.
Just checking to see how widel
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:24:26PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:10:32PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > I would
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo
> wrote:
> > Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
> > theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to
> > help further it.
> > J
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
> Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
> theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to
> help further it.
> Just checking to see how widely its been tested,
I've installed this patch
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:10:32PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
> > > improving
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
> > improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
> > see developi
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
> improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
> see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch
> aga
Hi.
I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch
against present head (r255131) can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~m
29 matches
Mail list logo
