Re: [acpi-jp 1931] Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Michael Smith wrote: On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 04:12 AM, Terry Lambert wrote: Repeat: #1 is power profiles I don't see why this requires an 'acpid'. You want a control tool, sure, but power policy is not something that needs a daemon. The tool has to change the settings based on

Re: [acpi-jp 1931] Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-10 Thread Michael Smith
On Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 12:19 AM, Terry Lambert wrote: Michael Smith wrote: On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 04:12 AM, Terry Lambert wrote: Repeat: #1 is power profiles I don't see why this requires an 'acpid'. You want a control tool, sure, but power policy is not something that

Re: [acpi-jp 1931] Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-09 Thread Michael Smith
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 04:12 AM, Terry Lambert wrote: Repeat: #1 is power profiles I don't see why this requires an 'acpid'. You want a control tool, sure, but power policy is not something that needs a daemon. o replacing devices in a multipurpose bay, which may take one of a