Hi crowd,
I have seen this problems several months ago and posted on -current, but
noone seemed to care. Was really disappointed then. I assume there's not
many people in the world running both -current and -stable on the same
box...
My symptoms were thus: newfs (-st) and fill filesystem works no
Bruce Evans wrote:
-current doesn't write extended attributes unless you enabled them.
OK. I'm wrong. Really I don't understand a problem. Superblock was
corrupted. I've fix it with fsck (from other sector). But I decided
remake the FS and run newfs from -stable again. Now I write on it buth
-s
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Doug White wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> >
> > > I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I
> > > plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there).
> > > I newfs'ed
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Doug White wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
>
> > I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I
> > plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there).
> > I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I bo
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I
> plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there).
> I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I booted
> with -stable I've found the partition FS was
Hello!
I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I
plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there).
I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I booted
with -stable I've found the partition FS was broken.
I think it's because of extended atr
