Re: 5.0 boot beastie animation?

2003-12-03 Thread Olev
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Olev writes: Just do not make it the default or people installing on serial consoles will hate you more than you imagine... Ofcourse, just like you need to set loader_color="YES" in loader.conf for colors, off by default. Olev ___

Re: 5.0 boot beastie animation?

2003-12-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Olev writes: >Just discovered a nice added leetness feature that makes the boot >beastie be drawn in full color (loader_color="YES" in loader.conf) ... >ok seems leet ... but wouldn't it be even more leet when it would be >drawn with the fork moving? One second wi

5.0 boot beastie animation?

2003-12-03 Thread Olev
Just discovered a nice added leetness feature that makes the boot beastie be drawn in full color (loader_color="YES" in loader.conf) ... ok seems leet ... but wouldn't it be even more leet when it would be drawn with the fork moving? One second with the fork 1 char space to left and then after

DVD burning under 5.0

2003-11-05 Thread dave
Bill, I found your post online when I was doing a search for burning DVD's using FreeBSD. We are about to configure an Athlon 2500 box, to use FreeBSD to act as our web, client and FTP server. We are going to need the ability to burn DVD's and so I am doing research on the topic. Have you have

Re: 'Hard error reading fsbn' in 5.1 but not 5.0?

2003-07-16 Thread Doug White
Darren has dicovered the magic of automatic block remapping. On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Just now, my 120GB western digital, immediately upon the mounting of all > filesystems during startup, made a faint "click", then my screen filled with > errors of the form: > > ad6: hard err

Re: 'Hard error reading fsbn' in 5.1 but not 5.0?

2003-07-16 Thread Eric Anderson
slice. I booted back into 5.0, and am presently writing across the entire disk with this command: fdisk -I /dev/ad6 && dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad6s1 bs=1m At more than 33 minutes into it at 24+MB/sec, there have been no such errors and the portion of the disk that was being mounted has a

'Hard error reading fsbn' in 5.1 but not 5.0?

2003-07-16 Thread Darren Pilgrim
lled by so fast I couldn't actually read parts of them. Those # signs are in place of large numbers (most were 12-18 digits). This was in 5.1-R, fresh install, in the first 15G of the disk, just after having booted into DOS to create some DOS partitions after the FreeBSD slice. I booted b

Re: Wi driver has WEP issues on both 5.0 and 5.1

2003-06-21 Thread Robert Watson
Network Associates Laboratories On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, BSDVault wrote: > A head up about the wi driver in FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1. I have a netgear > MA-311 card that supports HostAP mode. The issue is that I get a busy bit > error. The exact error starts with the following.. THIS ONLY

Re: Wi driver has WEP issues on both 5.0 and 5.1

2003-06-20 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 00:32:45 -0400 > From: BSDVault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > A head up about the wi driver in FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1. I have a netgear > MA-311 card that supports HostAP mode. The issue is that I get a busy bit > error.

Wi driver has WEP issues on both 5.0 and 5.1

2003-06-20 Thread BSDVault
A head up about the wi driver in FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1. I have a netgear MA-311 card that supports HostAP mode. The issue is that I get a busy bit error. The exact error starts with the following.. THIS ONLY OCCURS WHEN WEP IS ENABLED: wi0: timeout in wi_seek to fc00/0; last status 800b We then

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-17 Thread Chris Shenton
Don Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for doing the testing. I just committed this patch. Seems fine here too -- many thanks. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Don Lewis
On 16 Jun, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 16 Jun, Bruce Evans wrote: >> > In my review of 1.87, I forgot to ask you how atomic the close is with part >> > of it moved out to fifo_inactive(). I think it's important that all >> > traces of the old open have gone

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Don Lewis
On 16 Jun, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > I run qmail on my 4.8 servers. > > For my sanity, is this a problem in 5.1-RELEASE, or in code after 5.1-RELEASE? > We haven't upgraded to 5.1 yet (and don't intend to for a while), but I thought > I'd ask since this bug would cripple our mail server. It was b

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Don Lewis
On 16 Jun, Thorsten Schroeder wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > >> > FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Thu Jun 5 19:29:29 CEST 2003 >> > >> > fifo_vnops.c: >> > >> > $FreeBSD: src/sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c,v 1.87 2003/06/01 06:24:32 truckman Exp $ > >> Try upgrading to 1.88 and ap

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Thorsten Schroeder wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > >> > FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Thu Jun 5 19:29:29 CEST 2003 >> > >> > fifo_vnops.c: >> > >> > $FreeBSD: src/sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c,v 1.87 2003/06/01 06:24:32 >> > truckman Exp $ > >> Try upgrading to 1.88 and applyin

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Thorsten Schroeder
Hi, On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > > FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Thu Jun 5 19:29:29 CEST 2003 > > > > fifo_vnops.c: > > > > $FreeBSD: src/sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c,v 1.87 2003/06/01 06:24:32 truckman Exp $ > Try upgrading to 1.88 and applying this patch: > > Index: sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnop

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > On 16 Jun, Bruce Evans wrote: > > In my review of 1.87, I forgot to ask you how atomic the close is with part > > of it moved out to fifo_inactive(). I think it's important that all > > traces of the old open have gone away (as far as applications can tell)

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Terry Lambert
Don Lewis wrote: > Actually, something seems broken. I modified my little test program to > actually read the data, which works just fine, but select() still blocks > when the writer closes the fifo, so there doesn't seem to be a way to > detect the EOF. I think this should be covered under the "

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Don Lewis
On 16 Jun, Thorsten Schroeder wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > >> > I don't know what it could be - perhaps a problem with named pipes >> > ("lock/trigger")? >> > >> > You can find my ktrace output here: http://cs.so36.net/~ths/kdump.txt > >> Which version of fifo_vnops.c

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Don Lewis
On 16 Jun, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 16 Jun, I wrote: >> > On 16 Jun, Tim Robbins wrote: >> >> >>> This looks like a bug in the named pipe code. Reverting >> >>> sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c to the RELENG_5_0 version makes the problem go >> >>> away. I haven'

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > On 16 Jun, I wrote: > > On 16 Jun, Tim Robbins wrote: > > >>> This looks like a bug in the named pipe code. Reverting > >>> sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c to the RELENG_5_0 version makes the problem go > >>> away. I haven't tracked down exactly what change betwe

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Don Lewis
On 16 Jun, I wrote: > On 16 Jun, Tim Robbins wrote: >>> This looks like a bug in the named pipe code. Reverting >>> sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c to the RELENG_5_0 version makes the problem go >>> away. I haven't tracked down exactly what change between RELENG_5_0 and >>> RELENG_5_1 caused the proble

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Don Lewis
ww.LifeWithQmail.org. My main system was running FreeBSD >> > 5.0-RELEASE and -CURRENT and qmail was fine. When I just upgraded to >> > 5.1-CURRENT a couple days back, the qmail-send process started using >> > all CPU. >> >> This looks like a bug in the named pi

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-16 Thread Thorsten Schroeder
Hi, On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > > I don't know what it could be - perhaps a problem with named pipes > > ("lock/trigger")? > > > > You can find my ktrace output here: http://cs.so36.net/~ths/kdump.txt > Which version of fifo_vnops.c? If the problem is present in > 5.1-RELEASE, then

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-15 Thread Tim Robbins
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:09:51PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 08:43:15PM -0400, Chris Shenton wrote: > > > I've been running qmail for years and like it, installed pretty much > > per www.LifeWithQmail.org. My main system was running FreeBSD >

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-15 Thread Don Lewis
On 16 Jun, Thorsten Schroeder wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2003, Chris Shenton wrote: > >> [...] qmail is run under daemontools and all work fine (the configuration >> is 2 years old!), but when I delivery the first mail (localy or remote) >> the qmail-send process fire up to 100%

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-15 Thread Thorsten Schroeder
Hi, On Mon, 15 Jun 2003, Chris Shenton wrote: > [...] qmail is run under daemontools and all work fine (the configuration > is 2 years old!), but when I delivery the first mail (localy or remote) > the qmail-send process fire up to 100% of CPU infinitely > > All other mail are rig

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-15 Thread Tim Robbins
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 08:43:15PM -0400, Chris Shenton wrote: > I've been running qmail for years and like it, installed pretty much > per www.LifeWithQmail.org. My main system was running FreeBSD > 5.0-RELEASE and -CURRENT and qmail was fine. When I just upgraded to > 5.1

Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-15 Thread Fred Souza
> I've been running qmail for years and like it, installed pretty much > per www.LifeWithQmail.org. My main system was running FreeBSD > 5.0-RELEASE and -CURRENT and qmail was fine. When I just upgraded to > 5.1-CURRENT a couple days back, the qmail-send process started using &g

qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade

2003-06-15 Thread Chris Shenton
I've been running qmail for years and like it, installed pretty much per www.LifeWithQmail.org. My main system was running FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE and -CURRENT and qmail was fine. When I just upgraded to 5.1-CURRENT a couple days back, the qmail-send process started using all CPU. last pid:

Re: 5.0/5.1: Installer does not find CD-ROM drive - even thoughit's booted off it

2003-06-12 Thread Per von Zweigbergk
onsdagen den 11 juni 2003 kl 08.04 skrev Vitaly Markitantov: On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:19:08PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW - I have a Samsung SM-348 48x CD/DVD combo unit that works just fine under 5.1 (and 4.8): acd0: CD-RW at ata0-master PIO4 Yes, i have 48X SAMSUNG CD-ROM SC-148T, a

Re: 5.0/5.1: Installer does not find CD-ROM drive - even thoughit's booted off it

2003-06-10 Thread Vitaly Markitantov
ybe only 52X Samsung SC-152 is broken for FreeBSD. > > On 10 Jun, Vitaly Markitantov wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:20:03PM +0200, Per von Zweigbergk wrote: > >> Hello. > >> > >> I'm having difficulty with the ISO image of FreeBSD 5.1. The same &

Re: 5.0/5.1: Installer does not find CD-ROM drive - even thoughit's booted off it

2003-06-10 Thread none_NOSPAM
ulty with the ISO image of FreeBSD 5.1. The same >> problem also appeared in 5.0, but since 5.1 had come out, I decided to >> try that before reporting this bug. >> >> When booting the installer off the CD-ROM and doing a Standard install, >> you first get to the st

Re: 5.0/5.1: Installer does not find CD-ROM drive - even thoughit's booted off it

2003-06-09 Thread Vitaly Markitantov
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:20:03PM +0200, Per von Zweigbergk wrote: > Hello. > > I'm having difficulty with the ISO image of FreeBSD 5.1. The same > problem also appeared in 5.0, but since 5.1 had come out, I decided to > try that before reporting this bug. > > When

5.0/5.1: Installer does not find CD-ROM drive - even though it'sbooted off it

2003-06-09 Thread Per von Zweigbergk
Hello. I'm having difficulty with the ISO image of FreeBSD 5.1. The same problem also appeared in 5.0, but since 5.1 had come out, I decided to try that before reporting this bug. When booting the installer off the CD-ROM and doing a Standard install, you first get to the sta

Re: 4.8 -> 5.0-CURRENT build error

2003-06-07 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Evan S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : # make : building shared library libkse.so.1 : thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': : thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' : thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here : thr_libc.So: In

4.8 -> 5.0-CURRENT build error

2003-06-07 Thread Evan S.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm attempting to do a 'make buildworld' for FreeeBSD 5.0-CURRENT on a FreeBSD 4.8 box # uname -a FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #0: Thu Apr 3 10:53:38 GMT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC

Critical problems with md on 5.0-RC1

2003-06-05 Thread Jacques Garrigue
There is a very serious problem in the md filesystem, since at least 5.0-RELEASE, and it is not yet fixed. You can see details of the problem at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=47538 Since this problem may result in data corruption, I believe that at least there should be a

DVD burning under 5.0

2003-04-03 Thread Bill Moran
I'm looking at creating a machine for backing up/archiving other FreeBSD servers. One of the requirements will be burning DVDs (as some archives are 2-3g directories - difficult to break up) So the question I'm asking is: Is anyone actually using DVD burning under FreeBSD 5? If so, what make/mod

Re: Fw: problem updating from 4.7 Stable do 5.0 Current

2003-04-01 Thread Terry Lambert
Ventsislav Velkov wrote: > > Does anybody have an idea ? option DISABLE_PSE option DISABLE_PG_G -- Terry ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Fw: problem updating from 4.7 Stable do 5.0 Current

2003-04-01 Thread Ventsislav Velkov
Does anybody have an idea ? - Original Message - From: Ventsislav Velkov To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 2:15 PM Subject: problem updating from 4.7 Stable do 5.0 Current Hello all, I have a problem updating one of our servers from 4.7Stable to 5.0Current. It is a

Upgrading from 5.0-RELEASE to -CURRENT on sparc64 (me too)

2003-03-31 Thread jason
Im getting the same thing as http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+attempt+to+use+poisoned+%22malloc%22+cc1plus&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030212144405.82101A-10%40fledge.watson.org.lucky.freebsd.current&rnum=3 when doing a make buildworld.. after cvsupping C

Re: problem updating from 4.7 Stable do 5.0 Current

2003-03-31 Thread Ventsislav Velkov
I am on the same opinion also, but only the maintainer of the driver could confirm. From: Maxim M. Kazachek To: Ventsislav Velkov Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 5:22 PM Subject: Re: problem updating from 4.7 Stable do 5.0 Current Seems that the problem is in ida driver which runs

Re: problem updating from 4.7 Stable do 5.0 Current

2003-03-31 Thread CARTER Anthony
ode with the 5.0 kernel because it > brokes. > Do you mean I should boot in single user with the 4.7 kernel in there > installworld and to mergemaster ? > > regards, > Veno > > - Original Message - > From: CARTER <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Anthony > To: [EM

Re: problem updating from 4.7 Stable do 5.0 Current

2003-03-31 Thread Maxim M. Kazachek
What your server do when it panics? It tries to detect disks? Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Ventsislav Velkov wrote: >I could not boot in single user mode with the 5.0 kernel because it brokes. >Do yo

Re: problem updating from 4.7 Stable do 5.0 Current

2003-03-31 Thread Ventsislav Velkov
I could not boot in single user mode with the 5.0 kernel because it brokes. Do you mean I should boot in single user with the 4.7 kernel in there installworld and to mergemaster ? regards, Veno - Original Message - From: CARTER Anthony To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March

Re: isnan() with gcc 3.2.2 on FreeBSD 5.0-C

2003-03-31 Thread David Leimbach
On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 02:49 AM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: The isnan() macro is a new feature of C99 and thus not (yet) part of C++. Nevertheless you can use -D_GLIBCPP_USE_C99 to include this and There may be no guarantee that any new parts of C99 ever make it into the C++ language. C++

Re: problem updating from 4.7 Stable do 5.0 Current

2003-03-31 Thread CARTER Anthony
Have you installed the world? I don't know if just rebuilding it is sufficient To install the world you have to go to single user mode and run mergemaster to update any changes in configuration files (take a backup of your current files as it overwrites them). Anthony On Monday 31 March 2

problem updating from 4.7 Stable do 5.0 Current

2003-03-31 Thread Ventsislav Velkov
Hello all, I have a problem updating one of our servers from 4.7Stable to 5.0Current. It is a Compaq Proliant 7000 Server with 4 Xeons @500Mhz with 2MB L2 cache each. I has a 4200 Compaq Smart Raid Controler with attached 3 U1 Storages. I update the src rebuild the world from updated src to 5.0Cu

Re: isnan() with gcc 3.2.2 on FreeBSD 5.0-C

2003-03-31 Thread Stefan Farfeleder
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 02:46:05PM +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: > the following code snippet works fine with gcc 2.95.4 on RELENG_4 > but failed on my -current > > > #include > #include > > using namespace std; > > int main(void) > { > cout << isnan(1.0) << endl; > return 0; > } > >

Re: isnan() with gcc 3.2.2 on FreeBSD 5.0-C

2003-03-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 02:46:05PM +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: > what's wrong with my system ? or what can I do for it ? See Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

isnan() with gcc 3.2.2 on FreeBSD 5.0-C

2003-03-30 Thread Ying-Chieh Liao
the following code snippet works fine with gcc 2.95.4 on RELENG_4 but failed on my -current #include #include using namespace std; int main(void) { cout << isnan(1.0) << endl; return 0; } test.cpp: In function `int main()': test.cpp:8: `isnan' undeclared (first use this function) t

Re: freebsd 5.0 on hp netserver lf

2003-03-21 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Brian J. Kirk wrote: > but the dmesg and installer still don't list the scsi controller, and > hence no drives. set hw.eisa_slots="12" from the loader. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 2 x '84 Volvo 245

Re: freebsd 5.0 on hp netserver lf

2003-03-21 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:00:29PM -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > > > > I posted a question earlier on freebsd-questions concerning this, and have > > since discovered a bit more. Sorry about the cross posting. > > > > > > I'm trying to get 5.0 running o

Re: freebsd 5.0 on hp netserver lf

2003-03-21 Thread Brian J. Kirk
an J. Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 5:45 PM > Subject: freebsd 5.0 on hp netserver lf > > > > Folks, > > > > I posted a question earlier on freebsd-questions concerning this, and have > since disc

Re: freebsd 5.0 on hp netserver lf

2003-03-21 Thread Matthew Emmerton
- Original Message - From: "Brian J. Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 5:45 PM Subject: freebsd 5.0 on hp netserver lf > Folks, > > I posted a question earlier on freebsd-questions concerning this, and have sinc

freebsd 5.0 on hp netserver lf

2003-03-21 Thread Brian J. Kirk
Folks, I posted a question earlier on freebsd-questions concerning this, and have since discovered a bit more. Sorry about the cross posting. I'm trying to get 5.0 running on an old hp netserver lf. quoting some random website: "How come FreeBSD does not detect my HP Netser

Can't boot from hard drive (5.0)

2003-03-20 Thread BelletJr
Hello! Here is a summary of a thread I started on comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc to no avail. I hope someone will be able to give me some advice here I've installed FreeBSD 5.0 on the second disk of my PC where I had an old 4.5 working. Unfortunately the install process failed to write th

Re: OSS SBLive driver causes kernel panic with 5.0 current

2003-03-20 Thread Jody Franklin
David Schultz wrote: Thus spake Andre Guibert de Bruet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Jody Franklin wrote: I'd been keeping up with current (world/kernel) every other week or so, and until this week I had no real problems. But after the build I did on March 3rd my soundcard driver (4Fr

XServer Problem with FreeBSD 5.0-p4 i386

2003-03-20 Thread Gerald Mixa
Hi, I have just done a portupgrade and upgraded the XServer to 4.3.0,1 on my PC and do have the following Font problems with KDE3.1 a terminal window just shows little empty square boxes, this can be changed by alternating the font settings. (so far no major problem) but with konqueror I do

Re: pptp mpd under 5.0

2003-03-19 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Aaron Wohl writes: | Im trying to run pptp under 5.0 -current. (first time with mpd so | probably some config issue) | | I get these errors: | mpd: pid 1102, version 3.13 ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 09:35 | 17-Mar-2003) | [pptp0] can't create socket node: No such file or directory | mpd: local IP ad

Re: 5.0 - CURRENT - KERNEL COMPILE - HELP

2003-03-18 Thread Richard Arends
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, CARTER Anthony wrote: > udbp.o: In function `udbp_attach': > udbp.o(.text+0x40d): undefined reference to `ng_newtype' > udbp.o(.text+0x43b): undefined reference to `ng_make_node_common' > udbp.o(.text+0x482): undefined reference to `ng_name_node' > udbp.o(.text+0x4c1): undefin

5.0 - CURRENT - KERNEL COMPILE - HELP

2003-03-18 Thread CARTER Anthony
OK OK, I know this is cause I am missing (or added that I should not have) something in my Kernel, but I have been re-compiling kernels for about a week now with no clue as to what is doing this (see below). I can compile the GENERIC kernel, so I am sure that it is my kernel configuration files fau

Re: ports problem with 5.0-RELEASE -> CURRENT

2003-03-18 Thread Juriy Goloveshkin
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 04:07:32AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: Oh, I've found out occasionally what it was. I thought that /usr/obj is a good place for WRKDIRPREFIX. It looks good, but ... WRONG :) It this case current folder for make target(like that vvv) is not a /usr/ports/bla/bla, but /

Re: ports problem with 5.0-RELEASE -> CURRENT

2003-03-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 11:17:04AM +0300, Juriy Goloveshkin wrote: > What can be wrong??? Perhaps you didn't upgrade your ports collection completely. A common mistake is to forget to cvsup the ports-base collection. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

ports problem with 5.0-RELEASE -> CURRENT

2003-03-18 Thread Juriy Goloveshkin
Hello, I have a strange problem with ports in 5.0-RELEASE system with cvsup to CURRENT. make cannot find some targets while building any package. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/russian/d1489# make package ===> Extracting for ru-d1489-1.5 >> Checksum OK for d1489-1.5.tgz. ===> Pat

Re: pptp mpd under 5.0

2003-03-17 Thread Scot Hetzel
From: "Aaron Wohl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > replacement for MAKDEV to mkae them? ... and I cant seem to get truss to > run at all on any program... > bash-2.05b# truss mpd > truss: cannot open /proc/curproc/mem: No such file or directory > truss: cannot open /proc/1107/mem: No such file or directory >

pptp mpd under 5.0

2003-03-17 Thread Aaron Wohl
Im trying to run pptp under 5.0 -current. (first time with mpd so probably some config issue) I get these errors: mpd: pid 1102, version 3.13 ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 09:35 17-Mar-2003) [pptp0] can't create socket node: No such file or directory mpd: local IP address for PPTP is 10.23.0.3 [

Re: OSS SBLive driver causes kernel panic with 5.0 current

2003-03-15 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Andre Guibert de Bruet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Jody Franklin wrote: > > > I'd been keeping up with current (world/kernel) every other week or so, > > and until this week I had no real problems. But after the build I did on > > March 3rd my soundcard driver (4Front'

Re: OSS SBLive driver causes kernel panic with 5.0 current

2003-03-15 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Jody Franklin wrote: > I'd been keeping up with current (world/kernel) every other week or so, > and until this week I had no real problems. But after the build I did on > March 3rd my soundcard driver (4Front's SBLive/Audigy driver) causes a > kernel panic on load. If I don't

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Andy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:47:50PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: [...] > You can mount devfs into any places. For example a jail. > BTW, take extreme care, when doing this, because if you don't set up > devfs rules, anybody, who can become root in any jails can do things, > which will irreversibly chan

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Andy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:45:24PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy writes: > >On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:18:08PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote: [...] > >On 5.0-RELEASE-p4 I have > >/usr/src/etc/MAKEDEV > >and i use it for making

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > Hint: cp /dev/null /dev/[what is your root device outside the jail] I meant /dev/zero of course ;) (or /dev/random for the patient one) --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fre

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > On 5.0-RELEASE-p4 I have /usr/src/etc/MAKEDEV and i use it for making > the devices in jails. Is there a jail devfs or is the way described in > the jail(8) man page still the right(tm) one? You can mount devfs into any places. For example a jail. BTW, take extreme care, when d

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy writes: >On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:18:08PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote: >> Hartmann, O. (Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:59:52PM +0100) wrote: >> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: >[...] >> > All right, a new 'th

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Andy
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:18:08PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote: > Hartmann, O. (Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:59:52PM +0100) wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: [...] > > All right, a new 'think another way when going to FreeBSD 5.0 ...'. > > It also h

5.0 Install Kernel

2003-03-12 Thread Lucas Reddinger
I hope this is okay.. I needed to cross post this for more exposure. Apparently, I need to disable eisa support to successfully boot a kernel on my Dell Inspiron 2650. In 4.x, I would do a `boot -c` followed by `eisa 0`. What about FreeBSD 5.0? I tried `set hint.eisa.0.disabled=1` at the stage

Re: FBSD 5.0 diskless environment does not work!

2003-03-12 Thread Hartmann, O.
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: :>On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 03:43:52PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote: :> :>> Possibly I should repeat in short terms what I did when 'migrating' :>> from the working 4.X diskless system to the 5.0 system. :> :>I think some

Re: FBSD 5.0 diskless environment does not work!

2003-03-12 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:56:47 +0100 (CET) "Hartmann, O." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I nice feature would be to have some 'knob' switching on/off debugging, maybe > this is possible or already realized in the shell? How to do the verbosity > task? > rc_debug=yes -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: ht

Re: FBSD 5.0 diskless environment does not work!

2003-03-12 Thread Hartmann, O.
ce md0c, which means to me: no RAM disk. And therefore all subsequent errors are relying on this because the copy actions fail. Bytheway, I do not know how to do a fast and 'out of the long bug report way' bug report: while the newest 5.0-CURRENT stuff got rid of Kerberos IV, thenaming of

Re: FBSD 5.0 diskless environment does not work!

2003-03-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 03:43:52PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote: > Possibly I should repeat in short terms what I did when 'migrating' > from the working 4.X diskless system to the 5.0 system. I think some of the directory layout needed for diskless nfs booting was frobbed by dil

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-12 Thread Hiten Pandya
Hartmann, O. (Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:59:52PM +0100) wrote: > On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > :>On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote: > :>> Where are the MAKEDEV and MAKEDEV.local scripts in 5.0-CURRENT? > :>> I cvsupdate

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-12 Thread Hartmann, O.
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: :>On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote: :>> Where are the MAKEDEV and MAKEDEV.local scripts in 5.0-CURRENT? :>> I cvsupdate today last time and did a find through /usr/src, :>> but I can not find both scrip

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-12 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote: > Where are the MAKEDEV and MAKEDEV.local scripts in 5.0-CURRENT? > I cvsupdate today last time and did a find through /usr/src, > but I can not find both script ... MAKEDEV is dead, baby. MAKEDEV is dead (c) paraphrase f

MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-12 Thread Hartmann, O.
Where are the MAKEDEV and MAKEDEV.local scripts in 5.0-CURRENT? I cvsupdate today last time and did a find through /usr/src, but I can not find both script ... -- MfG O. Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Systemadministration des

Re: FBSD 5.0 diskless environment does not work!

2003-03-12 Thread Hartmann, O.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: :>In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :>"Hartmann, O." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: :>: Can anyone help? Has someone a runnng diskless FBSD 5.0-R/5-CURRENT :>: environment? :> :>I fixed a couple of bugs in

Re: FBSD 5.0 diskless environment does not work!

2003-03-11 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Hartmann, O." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Can anyone help? Has someone a runnng diskless FBSD 5.0-R/5-CURRENT : environment? I fixed a couple of bugs in the /etc/rc.d files that broke diskless boots about a month or two so

Re: 5.0-CURRENT diskless boot recognition

2003-03-11 Thread Hartmann, O.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, John Hay wrote: :>> :>> As I posted prior to this question, I have problems in getting diskless :>> started with 5.0-Current as cvsupdated today. The problem is still the same :>> and after a night of hairloosing work I think I got closer to the proble

Re: 5.0-CURRENT diskless boot recognition

2003-03-11 Thread John Hay
> > As I posted prior to this question, I have problems in getting diskless > started with 5.0-Current as cvsupdated today. The problem is still the same > and after a night of hairloosing work I think I got closer to the problem. > > We use PXE as bootstrap environment, isc-dh

5.0-CURRENT diskless boot recognition

2003-03-11 Thread Hartmann, O.
Hello. As I posted prior to this question, I have problems in getting diskless started with 5.0-Current as cvsupdated today. The problem is still the same and after a night of hairloosing work I think I got closer to the problem. We use PXE as bootstrap environment, isc-dhcp and a read-only disk

FBSD 5.0 diskless environment does not work!

2003-03-10 Thread Hartmann, O.
Hello. For a long time with FreeBSD 4.X we ran and still run a bunch of diskless stations, X11 Terminals, some special workstations and now a growing system with several nodes for usage as PVM. Now I want to switch to FreeBSD 5.0 and run into massive problems. I searched for similar problems in

ffs changes 4.8-PR2 -> 5.0?

2003-03-08 Thread Thomas Stratmann
t from the -current system and run the old fsck binary) However, for the 5.0 fsck the filesystem is completely ok (I did boot -s and fsck on the ro-mounted filesystem). Did some minor changes happen on UFS1 in the meantime or did we break something? Cheers Thomas Stratmann To Unsubscribe: send mail

OSS SBLive driver causes kernel panic with 5.0 current

2003-03-07 Thread Jody Franklin
I'd been keeping up with current (world/kernel) every other week or so, and until this week I had no real problems. But after the build I did on March 3rd my soundcard driver (4Front's SBLive/Audigy driver) causes a kernel panic on load. If I don't load the driver the system boots fine, and runs wi

Re: A few 5.0-Release questions...

2003-03-05 Thread John Wilson
--- Chris Shenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, I had absolutely no trouble booting and > installing 5.0-R on my 600SC, with the DELL-supplied CERC > RAID card (amr device recognized it, but it drives 4x > ATA disks rather than SCSI), and an Intel gigabit > ether card.

Re: A few 5.0-Release questions...

2003-03-05 Thread Chris Shenton
John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Dell PowerEdge] > > What model? There are quite a few PowerEdges out > > It's a 600SC - P4 1.8 - Perc3/SC FWIW, I had absolutely no trouble booting and installing 5.0-R

Re: A few 5.0-Release questions...

2003-03-04 Thread John Wilson
the problem with the NMI. The only thing that cleared it up was adding 'hw.pci.enable_io_modes=0' in /boot/device.hints. This was the case, at least, with 5.0-RELEASE. I've yet to see what happens with -CURRENT. Perhaps I'll try and cvsup -CURRENT, remove 'hw.pci.enab

Oops, never mind (was Re: 5.0 Release: `npx_driver',`npx_devclass'defined but not used, breaks kernel build

2003-03-04 Thread Geoffrey
ing the same tag yesterday > morning and rebuilt on a clean /obj with the same result. > 5.0 Release appears to be broken. > > On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Geoffrey wrote: > > > > Ladies and Gentlemen > > > > From a fresh cvsup of RELENG_5_0 this afternoon, make

Re: A few 5.0-Release questions...

2003-03-04 Thread Scott Long
John Wilson wrote: Good day, After spending quite some time trying to get 5.0-RELEASE installed on a Dell PowerEdge machine, it seems that all is now working quite well. Being that these machines are somewhat common, I'll share what was halting my installation. What model? There are quite

A few 5.0-Release questions...

2003-03-04 Thread John Wilson
Good day, After spending quite some time trying to get 5.0-RELEASE installed on a Dell PowerEdge machine, it seems that all is now working quite well. Being that these machines are somewhat common, I'll share what was halting my installation. These machines come with integrated video, a

GEOM problems when installing 5.0-RELEASE

2003-03-04 Thread Stijn Hoop
Hi all, please point me to the right list if this isn't the right one, but I'm running into what appears to be GEOM trouble when installing 5.0-RELEASE. [btw, the below uses MSDOS terminology for partitions, sorry] The setup is a fairly straight athlon 700 with IDE 2 harddisks, a prim

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >