Vallo Kallaste wrote:
Strange, I always thought the -current list is for general issues
related to -current branch and for true kernel hackers exist -hackers.
Ok, now you know differently. No problem. :)
--
"Welcome to the desert of the real."
- Laurence Fishburne as
Hello
Just did switchover to 5.0-current and noticed that building jpeg shared
library doesn't work. Lots of X apps depend on jpeg shared library. The
fix is very small, just edit patch-ac to include freebsd5* as well.
Just FYI.
--
Vallo Kallaste
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:30:32PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
Just did switchover to 5.0-current and noticed that building jpeg shared
This belongs in [EMAIL PROTECTED] *NOT* the freebsd-current list!!!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 08:19:24AM -0800, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:30:32PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
Just did switchover to 5.0-current and noticed that building jpeg shared
This belongs in [EMAIL PROTECTED] *NOT* the freebsd-current list!!!
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 06:26:37PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
This belongs in [EMAIL PROTECTED] *NOT* the freebsd-current list!!!
Yes, I did bounce the mail to freebsd-ports as well.
It's current thing also, no?
Not in the least. Specialized mailing lists exist to take the
specialized
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:31:39PM -0800, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's current thing also, no?
Not in the least. Specialized mailing lists exist to take the
specialized traffic off the more general lists.
Plus, the fix to your problem is to fix the port. The Ports team
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
Strange, I always thought the -current list is for general issues
related to -current branch ...
We really should have a new mailing list since we have an additional branch.
I'll again voice the opinion that the naming of the lists is sub-optimal.
