Re: Atomic install(1) by default (was: Re: groff breaks make -j N buildworld)

2001-04-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:39:30AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 05:53:53PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:12:24PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: atomic installation. Atomic installation (but not -C)

Re: Atomic install(1) by default (was: Re: groff breaks make -j N buildworld)

2001-04-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Hello Bruce! Forget all of this. I started incorporating OpenBSD fixes to install(1). They seem to cover all the cases you have mentioned. I will send a CFR when I finish. They used your revision 1.4 as the base, and implemented all of the todos, and even more. Thanks, -- Ruslan Ermilov

Atomic install(1) by default (was: Re: groff breaks make -j N buildworld)

2001-04-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 05:53:53PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:12:24PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: [...] IIRC, it is assumed that "make -jX install (where X 1)" _doesn't_ work. I've heard why, but I've forgotten :-) Right. One case where it doesn't work is