Re: Attn: CI/Jenkins people; Run bhyve instance for testing pf

2017-07-21 Thread Kristof Provost
On 20 Jul 2017, at 18:24, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: It would be great if you use vnet jails for that. I am not sure regarding the per-vnet pf functionality but I have seen many bug fixes hitting the tree since last year. You can ask on freebsd-virtualizat...@freebsd.org or freebsd...@freebsd.org t

Re: Attn: CI/Jenkins people; Run bhyve instance for testing pf

2017-07-20 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On 07/18/2017 02:55 AM, Panagiotes Mousikides wrote: Den 2017-07-16 kl. 21:11, skrev Alan Somers: On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Panagiotes Mousikides wrote: Hello everybody! I am working on adding tests to the FreeBSD test suite for testing pf, the network packet filter. These tests ne

Re: Attn: CI/Jenkins people; Run bhyve instance for testing pf

2017-07-17 Thread Panagiotes Mousikides
Den 2017-07-16 kl. 21:11, skrev Alan Somers: On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Panagiotes Mousikides wrote: Hello everybody! I am working on adding tests to the FreeBSD test suite for testing pf, the network packet filter. These tests need at least two machines running and connected to each ot

Attn: CI/Jenkins people; Run bhyve instance for testing pf

2017-07-16 Thread Panagiotes Mousikides
Hello everybody! I am working on adding tests to the FreeBSD test suite for testing pf, the network packet filter. These tests need at least two machines running and connected to each other, with one machine generating network traffic and the other running pf and filtering the traffic. I am

Re: Attn: CI/Jenkins people; Run bhyve instance for testing pf

2017-07-16 Thread Alan Somers
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Panagiotes Mousikides wrote: > Hello everybody! > > I am working on adding tests to the FreeBSD test suite for testing pf, the > network packet filter. > > These tests need at least two machines running and connected to each other, > with one machine generating net