Re: Best way to get a system on current?

2001-10-13 Thread Trent Nelson
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 11:36:30AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 09:20:35AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > > Might help if you provided a pointer to the problems you had in the > > "upgrade from -STABLE" case. For that matter, a bit more detail on the > > "install failed to

Re: Best way to get a system on current?

2001-10-12 Thread Bob Willcox
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 11:16:18AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 11:15:34AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > I am interested in what is the best way to get a test system running > > current? I have tried both upgrading from 4.4-stable (ran into kernel > > build problems) > >

Re: Best way to get a system on current?

2001-10-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 11:15:34AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > I am interested in what is the best way to get a test system running > current? I have tried both upgrading from 4.4-stable (ran into kernel > build problems) It would be nice to see the problems you experienced. One is supose to be

Re: Best way to get a system on current?

2001-10-12 Thread Bob Willcox
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 09:20:35AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > Might help if you provided a pointer to the problems you had in the > "upgrade from -STABLE" case. For that matter, a bit more detail on the > "install failed to mount the filesystems" for the "install from -CURRENT > snapshot" ca

Best way to get a system on current?

2001-10-12 Thread Bob Willcox
Hi All, I am interested in what is the best way to get a test system running current? I have tried both upgrading from 4.4-stable (ran into kernel build problems) and installing from the 5.0-20011011-CURRENT snapshot (install failed to mount the filesystems). I decided that I would query the net-