On 2002-11-04 20:25, Kelly Yancey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me know if this fixes things for you. Thanks,
Yes, the patch fixed things for me.
Thanks :)))
%%%
Index: kern/uipc_socket.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/
Kelly Yancey wrote:
> Thanks for the great trace and your patience. I believe I found the root of
> the problem. Could you please try the attached patch?
Works for me, thanks.
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
At 08:25 PM 11/4/2002 -0800, Kelly Yancey wrote:
>On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
>> On 2002-11-04 18:38, Kelly Yancey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Thanks for the info. Are you sure that you only reverted the one delta?
>>
>> Yes. I just recompiled the kernel from -rHEAD and sta
At Tue, 5 Nov 2002 03:12:05 +0200,
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> The curious thing is that Sendmail or ssh fail to look up hostnames,
> while running host(1) works. I don't know if this is of any help, but
> if you need more data about the local setup let me know.
host(or dig, nslookup) doesn't use
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2002-11-04 18:38, Kelly Yancey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the info. Are you sure that you only reverted the one delta?
>
> Yes. I just recompiled the kernel from -rHEAD and started logging
> things while I connected to my dialup pr
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 05:47:39PM -0800, Kelly Yancey wrote:
> > > A better question is why you are fixing a non-critical, over-1-year-old
> > > bug in networking code this close to the release??? Networking is our
> > > bread and butter, and changes to
On 2002-11-04 18:38, Kelly Yancey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Are you sure that you only reverted the one delta?
Yes. I just recompiled the kernel from -rHEAD and started logging
things while I connected to my dialup provider. Apparently lo0 does
have the 127.0.0.1 address
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 05:47:39PM -0800, Kelly Yancey wrote:
> > A better question is why you are fixing a non-critical, over-1-year-old
> > bug in networking code this close to the release??? Networking is our
> > bread and butter, and changes to it can be tricky. A known non-critical
> > bug t
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2002-11-04 10:45, Kelly Yancey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > > True. I had been seeing problems with network connections the last
> > > days, and was already in the process of backing out changes o
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:45:42AM -0800, Kelly Yancey wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >
> > > On 2002-11-04 01:16, Hidetoshi Shimokawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I have the same problem and reverting rev. 1.134 of
> > >
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Kelly Yancey wrote:
> > It doesn't matter. It isn't just DNS lookups, mountd fails to run too
> > because it cannot connect to portmap via localhost. Oddly, in both cases
> > sendto() is returning with errno = 49 (EADDRNOTAVAIL). I've tracked it down
On 2002-11-04 10:45, Kelly Yancey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > True. I had been seeing problems with network connections the last
> > days, and was already in the process of backing out changes one by one
> > when I saw this. Reverting 1.134 fixes
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:45:42AM -0800, Kelly Yancey wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
> > On 2002-11-04 01:16, Hidetoshi Shimokawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have the same problem and reverting rev. 1.134 of
> > > /sys/kern/uipc_socket.c fixes the problem.
> > > Th
Kelly Yancey wrote:
> It doesn't matter. It isn't just DNS lookups, mountd fails to run too
> because it cannot connect to portmap via localhost. Oddly, in both cases
> sendto() is returning with errno = 49 (EADDRNOTAVAIL). I've tracked it down
> to this code in sys/netinet/ip_output.c:
>
>
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Kelly Yancey wrote:
> > I suspect something in lib/libc/net/res_send.c is using special knowledge of
> > the contents of the socket buffer so calculate the real amount of data that
> > can be read (which this patch does automatically). I'm looking into
Kelly Yancey wrote:
> I suspect something in lib/libc/net/res_send.c is using special knowledge of
> the contents of the socket buffer so calculate the real amount of data that
> can be read (which this patch does automatically). I'm looking into it.
...To ensure that the read does not block, a
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote:
>
> > I have the same problem and reverting rev. 1.134 of
> > /sys/kern/uipc_socket.c fixes the problem.
>
> Confirmed here too, thanks for the tip. I had looked over the recent
> commits to /etc/lib/*, but non
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote:
> I have the same problem and reverting rev. 1.134 of
> /sys/kern/uipc_socket.c fixes the problem.
> The change might have something wrong with a loopback interface.
>
> /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa
> \/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PGP public key: http://www.sat.t
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2002-11-04 01:16, Hidetoshi Shimokawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have the same problem and reverting rev. 1.134 of
> > /sys/kern/uipc_socket.c fixes the problem.
> > The change might have something wrong with a loopback interface.
>
> True.
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote:
> I have the same problem and reverting rev. 1.134 of
> /sys/kern/uipc_socket.c fixes the problem.
Confirmed here too, thanks for the tip. I had looked over the recent
commits to /etc/lib/*, but none of them looked guilty.
Doug
To Unsubscribe: sen
On 2002-11-04 01:16, Hidetoshi Shimokawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the same problem and reverting rev. 1.134 of
> /sys/kern/uipc_socket.c fixes the problem.
> The change might have something wrong with a loopback interface.
True. I had been seeing problems with network connections the l
Doug Barton wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> With -current built from sources updated at around 8pm PST, I can't
> resolve hosts on the command line if /etc/resolv.conf points to a name
> server running on the local host. The local name server itself is
> working fine, and I can reach any host in /etc/hosts as
I have the same problem and reverting rev. 1.134 of
/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c fixes the problem.
The change might have something wrong with a loopback interface.
/\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa
\/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP public key: http://www.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~simokawa/pgp.html
Index: uipc_socket.c
=
Howdy,
With -current built from sources updated at around 8pm PST, I can't
resolve hosts on the command line if /etc/resolv.conf points to a name
server running on the local host. The local name server itself is
working fine, and I can reach any host in /etc/hosts as well.
ktrace /sbin/ping hub.f
24 matches
Mail list logo
