In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:26:16PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Luigi Rizzo writes:
: > : The attached portion of the 1.100 -> 1.101 patch to src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
: > ...
: > :
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 12:43:16AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:26:16PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Luigi Rizzo writes:
> > : The attached portion of the 1.100 -> 1.101 patch to src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
> > ...
> > : I wonder, how does a "m
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:13:46AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> The attached portion of the 1.100 -> 1.101 patch to src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
> (and a similar one in bsd.prog.mk 1.103 -> 1.104) broke cross builds
> of PicoBSD, specifically preventing the cross-environment header
> files to be found w
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:26:16PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Luigi Rizzo writes:
> : The attached portion of the 1.100 -> 1.101 patch to src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
> ...
> : I wonder, how does a "make world" get around this problem
> : (so i can try to reproduce the '
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Luigi Rizzo writes:
: The attached portion of the 1.100 -> 1.101 patch to src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
...
: I wonder, how does a "make world" get around this problem
: (so i can try to reproduce the 'fix' in the picobsd script) ?
Make world gets around this problem by d
The attached portion of the 1.100 -> 1.101 patch to src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
(and a similar one in bsd.prog.mk 1.103 -> 1.104) broke cross builds
of PicoBSD, specifically preventing the cross-environment header
files to be found when building libraries/programs. You can reproduce
this by doing
> Bruce Evans writes:
> The default of 4 for -mpreferred-stack-boundary perfectly preserves
> any initial misaligment of the stack. Under FreeBSD the stack is
> initially misaligned (for doubles) with a probability of 1/2. There
> was some discussion of fixing this when gcc-2.95 was imp
> Dan Nelson writes:
> In the last episode (May 05), Jean-Marc Zucconi said:
>> Here is something I don't understand:
>>
>> $ sh -c '/usr/bin/time ./a.out'
>> 2.40 real 2.38 user 0.01 sys
>> $ /usr/bin/time ./a.out
>> 7.19 real 7.19 user 0.00 sys
>>
On Sat, 6 May 2000, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (May 05), Jean-Marc Zucconi said:
> > Here is something I don't understand:
> >
> > $ sh -c '/usr/bin/time ./a.out'
> > 2.40 real 2.38 user 0.01 sys
> > $ /usr/bin/time ./a.out
> > 7.19 real 7.
In the last episode (May 05), Jean-Marc Zucconi said:
> Here is something I don't understand:
>
> $ sh -c '/usr/bin/time ./a.out'
> 2.40 real 2.38 user 0.01 sys
> $ /usr/bin/time ./a.out
> 7.19 real 7.19 user 0.00 sys
>
> The same program is 3 t
Here is something I don't understand:
$ sh -c '/usr/bin/time ./a.out'
2.40 real 2.38 user 0.01 sys
$ /usr/bin/time ./a.out
7.19 real 7.19 user 0.00 sys
The same program is 3 times slower in the second case. The effect is
systematic but depends o
11 matches
Mail list logo
