Hi:
I made the jump to CURRENT this morning (via a fresh -RC1 install) and
made the following observations.
1. Thought I toggled newfs off on the partition where /home was mounted.
It went ahead and zapped it anyway. Good thing for backups..
2. USB doesn't work with my chipset. I have an
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:59:04AM -0800, Marcus Reid wrote:
Hi:
I made the jump to CURRENT this morning (via a fresh -RC1 install) and
made the following observations.
1. Thought I toggled newfs off on the partition where /home was mounted.
It went ahead and zapped it anyway. Good
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:59:04AM -0800, Marcus Reid wrote:
Hi:
2. USB doesn't work with my chipset. I have an Asus A7V with VIA chipset.
Kernel messages follow. Please contact me if I can assist in debugging.
Looks like I spoke too soon. It doesn't work with the RC1 GENERIC kernel,
but
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:25:22PM -0500, Chris Faulhaber wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:59:04AM -0800, Marcus Reid wrote:
Hi:
I made the jump to CURRENT this morning (via a fresh -RC1 install) and
made the following observations.
1. Thought I toggled newfs off on the partition
I'm trying to thrash 5.0 a bit but I've run into some rather more
basic issues right off.
1) I think I'm suffering from the 1GB memory hang problem. I'm
definitely getting the hangs :-) I'll leave this for now since I'll
do some more testing tonight and it's already been raised by someone
else
Mark Murray wrote:
I'm trying to thrash 5.0 a bit but I've run into some rather more
basic issues right off.
1) I think I'm suffering from the 1GB memory hang problem. I'm
definitely getting the hangs :-) I'll leave this for now since I'll
do some more testing tonight and it's already been
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:37:20AM -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote:
Mark Murray wrote:
I'm trying to thrash 5.0 a bit but I've run into some rather more
basic issues right off.
1) I think I'm suffering from the 1GB memory hang problem. I'm
definitely getting the hangs :-) I'll leave this for
Scott Long wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:37:20AM -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote:
Mark Murray wrote:
I'm trying to thrash 5.0 a bit but I've run into some rather more
basic issues right off.
1) I think I'm suffering from the 1GB memory hang problem. I'm
definitely getting the hangs :-)
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:01:08PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
3) The compiler won't build some C++ packages, evolution being the
particular one bothering me at the moment. Is this a known issues
that the 5.0 compiler won't build all packages?
Yes.
Kris
msg48472/pgp0.pgp
Description:
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 15:48, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:01:08PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
3) The compiler won't build some C++ packages, evolution being the
particular one bothering me at the moment. Is this a known issues
that the 5.0 compiler won't build all
On 10 Dec 2002 16:02:14 -0500
Joe Marcus Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Evo isn't a C++ application. I haven't seen any build logs for it,
either. I'm doing a build on my i386 machine now just to be sure.
I built it a couple of days ago on my 5.0-RC system, works okay.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:02:14PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 15:48, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:01:08PM +, Paul Richards wrote:
3) The compiler won't build some C++ packages, evolution being the
particular one bothering me at the
I have 2 issues with 4.0-CURRENT. The first is the plethora of
"microuptime() went backwards..." errors that scroll on my console.
The second is that I have DDB compiled into my kernel (and a USB keyboard)
either on vga or serial console, if I trip DDB (control-shift-esc), I will
either get
13 matches
Mail list logo
