> >> Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline now, but as far as I know none of these
> >> fixes have been applied to -STABLE. Any chances to do it yet? As far as I
> >> know, the "oce" driver is currently unusable in -STABLE. I managed to
> >> cause a panic reliably within 30 seconds.
> >
> > Was there a
On 05/12/2014 13:07, Borja Marcos wrote:
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote:
On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has worked with
folks at Emulex to maintain thi
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote:
>> On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>> I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has worked
>>> with
>>> folks at Emulex to maintain this driver. He is proba
On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote:
On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has worked with
folks at Emulex to maintain this driver. He is probably the best person to
review this.
Hi,
Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline n
On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has worked with
> folks at Emulex to maintain this driver. He is probably the best person to
> review this.
Hi,
Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline now, but as far as I know none of th
On Jul 15, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> So, asking for spiritual counsel now. Would you use this driver in a
> production environment instead of the 747 version downloaded from Emulex? I
> think the latter is giving slightly better performance but, anyway, I disable
> LRO and
2014-07-15 12:00 GMT+02:00 Borja Marcos :
>
> On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> > I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to
> > work.
> > Do you have a panic?
>
> So far, so good. I've ran a couple of iperf3 tests (60 seconds, trying
> both
On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to
> work.
> Do you have a panic?
So far, so good. I've ran a couple of iperf3 tests (60 seconds, trying both
directions) and it doesn't crash.
Without the fixes I ob
2014-07-15 11:46 GMT+02:00 Borja Marcos :
>
> On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> > I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to
> work.
> > Do you have a panic?
>
> Still compiling :) Anyway, you didn't suffer panics before, right?
Right, I di
On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to work.
> Do you have a panic?
Still compiling :) Anyway, you didn't suffer panics before, right?
Borja.
___
freebsd-c
I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to
work.
Do you have a panic?
Cheers,
Stefano
2014-07-15 11:19 GMT+02:00 Stefano Garzarella :
> I think there is some problem with the email formatting.
> I send you a file with both patches.
>
> Cheers,
> Stefano
>
>
> 2014-
I think there is some problem with the email formatting.
I send you a file with both patches.
Cheers,
Stefano
2014-07-15 11:12 GMT+02:00 Borja Marcos :
>
> On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> > I used the "oce" driver in CURRENT.
> > I think that this patch in combinatio
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> I used the "oce" driver in CURRENT.
> I think that this patch in combination with the previous one should work in
> 10-STABLE.
>
> I have only tested if it works with CURRENT, but now I try if it works with
> 10-STABLE and I'll send you s
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> I used the "oce" driver in CURRENT.
> I think that this patch in combination with the previous one should work in
> 10-STABLE.
>
> I have only tested if it works with CURRENT, but now I try if it works with
> 10-STABLE and I'll send yo
I used the "oce" driver in CURRENT.
I think that this patch in combination with the previous one should work in
10-STABLE.
I have only tested if it works with CURRENT, but now I try if it works with
10-STABLE and I'll send you some feedback.
Cheers,
Stefano
2014-07-15 10:28 GMT+02:00 Borja Marc
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Hi,
> I found other problems in the "oce" driver during some experiments with
> netmap in emulation mode.
What about driver version 10.0.747.0? At least in my configuration it works
perfectly, no crashes despite keeping it running for s
Hi,
I found other problems in the "oce" driver during some experiments with
netmap in emulation mode.
In details:
- missing locking:
- in some functions there are write accesses on the wq struct (tx queue
descriptor)
without acquire LOCK on the queue, particularly in oce_wq_handler() that is
invok
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Borja Marcos wrote:
...
> The environment details are here:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
>
> The way I produce an instant panic is:
>
> 1) Connect to another machine (cross connect cable)
>
> 2) iperf3 -s on the other machine
> (The
On Jul 7, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Borja Marcos wrote:
> we'll try to investigate, can you tell us more about the environment you use ?
> (FreeBSD version, card model (PCI id perhaps), iperf3 invocation line,
> interface configuration etc.)
>
> The
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Borja Marcos wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:58 PM, wrote:
>> El 30.06.2014 18:36, Stefano Garzarella escribió:
>>
>> Hello,
>> I had problems during some experiments with Emulex and "oce" driver in
On Jul 1, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:58 PM, wrote:
> El 30.06.2014 18:36, Stefano Garzarella escribió:
>
> Hello,
> I had problems during some experiments with Emulex and "oce" driver in
> CURRENT.
> I found several bugs in the "oce" driver and thi
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:58 PM, wrote:
> El 30.06.2014 18:36, Stefano Garzarella escribió:
>
> Hello,
>> I had problems during some experiments with Emulex and "oce" driver in
>> CURRENT.
>> I found several bugs in the "oce" driver and this patch fixes them.
>>
>
> At least with some cards, the
El 30.06.2014 18:36, Stefano Garzarella escribió:
Hello,
I had problems during some experiments with Emulex and "oce" driver in
CURRENT.
I found several bugs in the "oce" driver and this patch fixes them.
At least with some cards, the driver simply does not work. It causes a
panic when there i
On Monday, June 30, 2014 12:36:22 pm Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Hello,
> I had problems during some experiments with Emulex and "oce" driver in
> CURRENT.
> I found several bugs in the "oce" driver and this patch fixes them.
>
> - oce_multiq_start(): if the link is down returns ENXIO without cons
Hello,
I had problems during some experiments with Emulex and "oce" driver in
CURRENT.
I found several bugs in the "oce" driver and this patch fixes them.
- oce_multiq_start(): if the link is down returns ENXIO without consuming
the mbuf.
A trivial fix is to remove the initial error check, since
25 matches
Mail list logo
