In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, walt writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Julian Elischer writes:
>>
>>>I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
>>>disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
>>>relative offsets...
>
>> Better plan: Abandon BS
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, walt wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Julian Elischer writes:
> > >
> > >>I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
> > >>disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
> > >>relative
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, walt wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Julian Elischer writes:
> >
> >>I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
> >>disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
> >>relative offsets...
>
> > Better plan: Abandon BSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
relative offsets...
Better plan: Abandon BSD labels before disks outgrow them.
To be replaced bywh
I agree with that too.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
> lian Elischer writes:
> >
> >I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
> >disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
> >relative offset
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
lian Elischer writes:
>
>I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
>disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
>relative offsets. if the flag is not set then absolute offsets are
>expected.. That would give a w
I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
relative offsets. if the flag is not set then absolute offsets are
expected.. That would give a way for us to move forward while still
allowing partitions to c