Re: LOR in VM (with backtrace)

2003-06-24 Thread Alan L. Cox
Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Alan L. Cox writes: > > Thanks for letting me know. This is another false positive: Witness > > can't distinguish the lock on the object being destroyed from the lock > > on the object used by UMA because their labels are the same. They will > > never, however, be

Re: LOR in VM (with backtrace)

2003-06-24 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Alan L. Cox writes: > Thanks for letting me know. This is another false positive: Witness > can't distinguish the lock on the object being destroyed from the lock > on the object used by UMA because their labels are the same. They will > never, however, be the same object. So, deadlock isn'

Re: LOR in VM (with backtrace)

2003-06-24 Thread Alan L. Cox
Kris Kennaway wrote: > > CURRENT dated June 19; > > lock order reversal > 1st 0xc45788ac vm object (vm object) @ > /a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_object.c:1506 > 2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ > /a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:328 > > Debugger(c03f

LOR in VM (with backtrace)

2003-06-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
CURRENT dated June 19; lock order reversal 1st 0xc45788ac vm object (vm object) @ /a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_object.c:1506 2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ /a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:328 Debugger(c03f450d,c082f110,c043190e,c043190e,c043178f)