Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Alan L. Cox writes:
> > Thanks for letting me know. This is another false positive: Witness
> > can't distinguish the lock on the object being destroyed from the lock
> > on the object used by UMA because their labels are the same. They will
> > never, however, be
Alan L. Cox writes:
> Thanks for letting me know. This is another false positive: Witness
> can't distinguish the lock on the object being destroyed from the lock
> on the object used by UMA because their labels are the same. They will
> never, however, be the same object. So, deadlock isn'
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> CURRENT dated June 19;
>
> lock order reversal
> 1st 0xc45788ac vm object (vm object) @
> /a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_object.c:1506
> 2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @
> /a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:328
>
> Debugger(c03f
CURRENT dated June 19;
lock order reversal
1st 0xc45788ac vm object (vm object) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_object.c:1506
2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @
/a/asami/portbuild/i386/src-client/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:328
Debugger(c03f450d,c082f110,c043190e,c043190e,c043178f)