On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 22:24 +0200, Marek Salwerowicz wrote:
> W dniu 2012-10-04 20:51, Lev Serebryakov pisze:
> > Hello, Marek.
> > You wrote 3 октября 2012 г., 23:17:35:
> >
> >>> atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 on acpi0
> > MS> still the same in my environment, running FreeBSD 9.1 under ESXi5.1 host
> >
W dniu 2012-10-04 20:51, Lev Serebryakov pisze:
Hello, Marek.
You wrote 3 октября 2012 г., 23:17:35:
atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 on acpi0
MS> still the same in my environment, running FreeBSD 9.1 under ESXi5.1 host
MS> Do you have any solution?
In my case it was local patch for exotic embedded c
Hello, Marek.
You wrote 3 октября 2012 г., 23:17:35:
>> atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 on acpi0
MS> still the same in my environment, running FreeBSD 9.1 under ESXi5.1 host
MS> Do you have any solution?
In my case it was local patch for exotic embedded chipset...
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
W dniu 2012-09-19 22:22, Lev Serebryakov pisze:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to
build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4)
revision. Unfortunately, I cannot provide exact version, as sources
are in this unb
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:57:30 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore
wrote:
...
Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to
learn enough about installing/configuring vi
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 15:10 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 19 September 2012 14:57, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore
> > wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
> >> committed because it locks up virtualbox
On 19 September 2012 14:57, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore
> wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
>> committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to
>> learn enough about installing/configu
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore
wrote:
...
> Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
> committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to
> learn enough about installing/configuring virtualbox to figure out what
> the problem is (offhand,I
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:30 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 19 September 2012 14:12, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
> >> Right. Being totally clueless, is atrc_start() called just at
> >> probe/attach, or during normal operation?
> >>
> >
> > It's called just once, from the attach() routine for the rtc devi
On 19 September 2012 14:12, Ian Lepore wrote:
>> Right. Being totally clueless, is atrc_start() called just at
>> probe/attach, or during normal operation?
>>
>
> It's called just once, from the attach() routine for the rtc device.
Right. Just have it loop over say 100 times, with a 10us sleep b
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:08 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 19 September 2012 14:05, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
> >> Add something to atrtc_start() to only loop over that loop say, 64k
> >> times before dropping out; and print an error if it hits that
> >> condition.
> >>
> >> Also, what's that RTCSA_81
On 19 September 2012 14:05, Ian Lepore wrote:
>> Add something to atrtc_start() to only loop over that loop say, 64k
>> times before dropping out; and print an error if it hits that
>> condition.
>>
>> Also, what's that RTCSA_8192 bit do?
>
> That should set the interrupt rate really high, to min
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:00 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 19 September 2012 13:54, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > Hello, Ian.
> > You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:46:24:
> >
> > IL> Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
> > IL> committed because it locks up virtualbox. I
On 19 September 2012 13:54, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Ian.
> You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:46:24:
>
> IL> Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
> IL> committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to
> IL> learn enough about installing/confi
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:46:24:
IL> Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
IL> committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to
IL> learn enough about installing/configuring virtualbox to figure out what
IL> the problem is (offhan
Ah, what's the patch?
adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 00:37 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-current.
> You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:22:00:
>
> LS> I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to
> LS> build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4)
> LS> revision. Unfort
Hello, Adrian.
You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:41:20:
>> It looks like patch to RTC which is useful on Geode LX causes this
>> hang.
AC> 240689 is a doc commit. Which commit is it really? :)
I'm testing theory (build kernel from fresh sources), that it is
caused by local RTC patch, which he
240689 is a doc commit. Which commit is it really? :)
Adrian
On 19 September 2012 13:37, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-current.
> You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:22:00:
>
> LS> I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to
> LS> build router's NanoBSD image, t
Hello, Freebsd-current.
You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:22:00:
LS> I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to
LS> build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4)
LS> revision. Unfortunately, I cannot provide exact version, as sources
LS> are in this u
Hello, Freebsd-current.
I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to
build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4)
revision. Unfortunately, I cannot provide exact version, as sources
are in this unbootable VM too :)
Kernel is GENERIC.
VBox config
21 matches
Mail list logo
