On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:28:06PM +1030, Matthew Thyer wrote:
> Michael Class wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > i am seeing a problem with 5.0-current (from 14.12.00) and a 3COM
> > 3CCFE575CT Lancard (pc-cardbus) using the xl-driver.
>
> [snip]
>
> > Why behaves my FreeBSD-machines worse then th
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Michael Class wrote:
> It seems that NewReno is switched on by default in current.
> Unfortunately switching off NewReno does not change the problem. In
> times of very high network-traffic I am still unable to use the network.
> The system does not even respond to a ping wh
Matthew Thyer wrote:
>
> Michael Class wrote:
> > i am seeing a problem with 5.0-current (from 14.12.00) and a 3COM
> > 3CCFE575CT Lancard (pc-cardbus) using the xl-driver.
>
> > Why behaves my FreeBSD-machines worse then the other boxes? Any Ideas?
>
> Make sure you are running with the TCP/IP
Michael Class wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> i am seeing a problem with 5.0-current (from 14.12.00) and a 3COM
> 3CCFE575CT Lancard (pc-cardbus) using the xl-driver.
[snip]
> Why behaves my FreeBSD-machines worse then the other boxes? Any Ideas?
Make sure you are running with the TCP/IP NewReno optimi
Michael Class wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> i am seeing a problem with 5.0-current (from 14.12.00) and a 3COM
> 3CCFE575CT Lancard (pc-cardbus) using the xl-driver.
[snip]
> Why behaves my FreeBSD-machines worse then the other boxes? Any Ideas?
Make sure you are running with the TCP/IP NewReno optimi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Michael Class writes:
: xl0: no carrier - transceiver cable problem?
: Why behaves my FreeBSD-machines worse then the other boxes? Any Ideas?
My 3CCFE575CT doesn't have this problem, except when I'm using it with
a bad cable. Maybe that's the problem?
Warner
To
Hello,
i am seeing a problem with 5.0-current (from 14.12.00) and a 3COM
3CCFE575CT Lancard (pc-cardbus) using the xl-driver. It goes as follows:
I am using the 3COM-card in a 10MB-switched network. Occasionally
someone is doing big network installs via multicast IP-packets. This
is done with a