Re: Proposed patch for "/bin/sh: Argument list too long" when compiling LINT ...

2002-02-22 Thread Terry Lambert
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020221 16:19] wrote: > > Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > i think Al's solution (make -V ... | xargs .. ) > > > wins both in terms of simplicity and efficiency > > > > Ah, of course! now why didn't I think of that?

Re: Proposed patch for "/bin/sh: Argument list too long" when compiling LINT ...

2002-02-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020221 16:19] wrote: > > Ah, of course! now why didn't I think of that? :) > My first thought was: > "If make(1) doesn't have that functionality I will beat it into it >with a lead pipe..." Heh :) He

Re: Proposed patch for "/bin/sh: Argument list too long" when compiling LINT ...

2002-02-21 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020221 16:19] wrote: > Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > i think Al's solution (make -V ... | xargs .. ) > > wins both in terms of simplicity and efficiency > > Ah, of course! now why didn't I think of that? :) My first thought was: "If mak

Re: Proposed patch for "/bin/sh: Argument list too long" when compiling LINT ...

2002-02-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i think Al's solution (make -V ... | xargs .. ) > wins both in terms of simplicity and efficiency Ah, of course! now why didn't I think of that? :) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "uns

Re: Proposed patch for "/bin/sh: Argument list too long" when compiling LINT ...

2002-02-21 Thread Luigi Rizzo
> Not particularly efficient... oh yes... i think Al's solution (make -V ... | xargs .. ) wins both in terms of simplicity and efficiency cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Proposed patch for "/bin/sh: Argument list too long" when compiling LINT ...

2002-02-21 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020221 15:47] wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 03:41:46PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020221 15:14] wrote: > > > So, in this thread a few days ago i reported that the > > > list of arguments passed to mkdep can become qui

Re: Proposed patch for "/bin/sh: Argument list too long" when compiling LINT ...

2002-02-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any better ideas ? You could just chicken out and do Index: kern.post.mk === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/conf/kern.post.mk,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.7 kern.post.mk --- kern.post

Re: Proposed patch for "/bin/sh: Argument list too long" when compiling LINT ...

2002-02-21 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 03:41:46PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020221 15:14] wrote: > > So, in this thread a few days ago i reported that the > > list of arguments passed to mkdep can become quite large > > and exceed kern.argmax, especially if your sources

Re: Proposed patch for "/bin/sh: Argument list too long" when compiling LINT ...

2002-02-21 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020221 15:14] wrote: > So, in this thread a few days ago i reported that the > list of arguments passed to mkdep can become quite large > and exceed kern.argmax, especially if your sources are not in the > default place and you are compiling a file with lots of o

Proposed patch for "/bin/sh: Argument list too long" when compiling LINT ...

2002-02-21 Thread Luigi Rizzo
So, in this thread a few days ago i reported that the list of arguments passed to mkdep can become quite large and exceed kern.argmax, especially if your sources are not in the default place and you are compiling a file with lots of options such as LINT. The place to fix (for -current) is sys/con