Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:18:10AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND > 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find > 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00% XFree86

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 David Wolfskill wrote: >>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:56:38 -0800 (PST) >>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> OK; that's a good & useful thing to keep in mind. And I did see some >>> IRQ-related entries in top's output. > >>Are they getting %CPU though. When running top -S,

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:56:38 -0800 (PST) >From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> OK; that's a good & useful thing to keep in mind. And I did see some >> IRQ-related entries in top's output. >Are they getting %CPU though. When running top -S, the CPU %'s should always >add up to about 10

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 David Wolfskill wrote: >>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:21:45 -0800 (PST) >>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Keep in mind that we no longer charge interrupt time to the process being >>interrupted, instead all that interrupt handling has been pushed off into >>ithreads. Same f

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
Also, I happened to note that as I'm doing a "make buildworld" (for today's -STABLE, running in yesterday's -STABLE), my "top -S" output shows a large number of "0.00" entries for CPU (on the same laptop as my previously-reported results). So it may be odd, but at least -- in my case -- it appear

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010327 08:33] wrote: > > On 27-Mar-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND > > 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find > > 385 root 40 32740K 31

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:21:46 -0800 (PST) >From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Hmm... mine loks like that (modulo #CPUs), except when I'm actually >> making it do some work (re-building the kernel, in this case). What I >> see ("top -S") looks like: >> last pid: 9546; load averages:

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 David Wolfskill wrote: >>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 03:18:10 -0800 >>From: Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND >> 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find >> 385 root

RE: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 David Wolfskill wrote: >>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:33:10 -0800 (PST) >>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Not one that I've seen: > >> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND >> 11 root -160 0K 0K CPU0 0 79.5H 49.37% 4

RE: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:33:10 -0800 (PST) >From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Not one that I've seen: > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND > 11 root -160 0K 0K CPU0 0 79.5H 49.37% 49.37% idle: cpu0 > 10 root -160

RE: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND > 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find > 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00% XFree86 > 836 root -80

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 03:18:10 -0800 >From: Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND > 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find > 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00%