On 16 Dec 2013, at 21:35, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
In any case, if anything like this is implemented, I would really prefer
something like CMake does, e.g. give you a percentage counter that
provides some information about how 'far' the build is progressing.
I haven't seen this
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:18 AM, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 16 Dec 2013, at 21:35, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
In any case, if anything like this is implemented, I would really prefer
something like CMake does, e.g. give you a percentage counter that
provides
On 19 Dec 2013, at 09:40, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
If a command produces warning output but exits with success, then that
command's output is dumped to stdout (explicitly serialised by Ninja so that
it's never interleaved with another command's output).
If a command exits
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:57:38AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
On 19 Dec 2013, at 09:40, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
...
Oh, and when I do a build of LLVM/Clang on my laptop using Ninja, it takes
about 3-5 minutes, whereas when I do it with our build system it takes
about 15.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16 Dec 2013, at 19:46, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
The following is a proof-of-concept patch to make system builds
less chatty.
It also has the nice side effect of showing more clearly
which rules are
The following is a proof-of-concept patch to make system builds
less chatty.
It also has the nice side effect of showing more clearly
which rules are used during the build and possibly help
debugging the share/mk files and the individual Makefiles.
The logic is the following:
the
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
The following is a proof-of-concept patch to make system builds
less chatty.
It also has the nice side effect of showing more clearly
which rules are used during the build and possibly help
debugging the share/mk files
On 16 Dec 2013, at 19:46, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
The following is a proof-of-concept patch to make system builds
less chatty.
It also has the nice side effect of showing more clearly
which rules are used during the build and possibly help
debugging the share/mk files and the