On 5/11/2016 2:12 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
On 0510T1522, Matthew Grooms wrote:
The PR 204901 filed for this can be closed now that the author (ahem)
has committed support for the camcontrol reprobe command ...
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204901
https://docs.free
On 0510T1522, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> On 11/28/2015 10:03 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> > On 11/28/2015 6:10 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> >> On 11/27/2015 7:44 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> >>> I spent the day looking over the FreeBSD cam and scsi_da source code.
> >>> After sprinkling a bunch of printf
On 11/28/2015 10:03 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote:
On 11/28/2015 6:10 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote:
On 11/27/2015 7:44 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote:
I spent the day looking over the FreeBSD cam and scsi_da source code.
After sprinkling a bunch of printf's around to see what code paths
were being called, It'
On 11/28/2015 6:10 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote:
On 11/27/2015 7:44 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote:
I spent the day looking over the FreeBSD cam and scsi_da source code.
After sprinkling a bunch of printf's around to see what code paths
were being called, It's obvious that Edward was correct in assuming
On 11/27/2015 7:44 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote:
I spent the day looking over the FreeBSD cam and scsi_da source code.
After sprinkling a bunch of printf's around to see what code paths
were being called, It's obvious that Edward was correct in assuming
that ESXi doesn't return any 'Unit Attention'
On 11/27/2015 12:56 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote:
I thought it would be useful to get more output from the geom layer,
similar to the camcontrol debug output ...
[root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=0x81
When I resize the iSCSI LUN and run the 'camcontrol readcap da2 -h', I
s
On 11/27/2015 12:08 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote:
On 11/27/2015 3:16 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 27-11-2015 06:59, Matthew Grooms wrote:
All,
I know this is a very late follow up, but spent some more time looking
at this today and found some additional information that I found quite
interest
On 11/27/2015 3:16 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 27-11-2015 06:59, Matthew Grooms wrote:
On 10/16/2014 3:10 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
On 1010T1529, Matthew Grooms wrote:
All,
I am a long time user and advocate of FreeBSD and manage a several
deployments of FreeBSD in a few data c
On 27-11-2015 06:59, Matthew Grooms wrote:
On 10/16/2014 3:10 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
On 1010T1529, Matthew Grooms wrote:
All,
I am a long time user and advocate of FreeBSD and manage a several
deployments of FreeBSD in a few data centers. Now that these
environments are almost alwa
On 10/16/2014 3:10 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
On 1010T1529, Matthew Grooms wrote:
All,
I am a long time user and advocate of FreeBSD and manage a several
deployments of FreeBSD in a few data centers. Now that these
environments are almost always virtual, it would make sense that FreeBSD
On 10/16/2014 3:17 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Oct 16, 2014, at 1:10, Edward Tomasz Napierała
wrote:
"camcontrol rescan" does not force fetching the updated disk size.
AFAIK there is no way to do that. However, this should happen
automatically, if the "other side" properly sends proper Un
On 2014-10-16 04:17, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Oct 16, 2014, at 1:10, Edward Tomasz Napierała
wrote:
"camcontrol rescan" does not force fetching the updated disk size.
AFAIK there is no way to do that. However, this should happen
automatically, if the "other side" properly sends proper Unit
> On Oct 16, 2014, at 1:10, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> "camcontrol rescan" does not force fetching the updated disk size.
> AFAIK there is no way to do that. However, this should happen
> automatically, if the "other side" properly sends proper Unit Attention
> after resizing. No idea wh
On 1010T1529, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> All,
>
> I am a long time user and advocate of FreeBSD and manage a several
> deployments of FreeBSD in a few data centers. Now that these
> environments are almost always virtual, it would make sense that FreeBSD
> support for basic features such as dynami
All,
I am a long time user and advocate of FreeBSD and manage a several
deployments of FreeBSD in a few data centers. Now that these
environments are almost always virtual, it would make sense that FreeBSD
support for basic features such as dynamic disk resizing. It looks like
most of the par
15 matches
Mail list logo
