Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 5/11/2016 2:12 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: On 0510T1522, Matthew Grooms wrote: The PR 204901 filed for this can be closed now that the author (ahem) has committed support for the camcontrol reprobe command ... https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204901 https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=866020+0+current/svn-src-head Ugh. I honestly have no idea how did I manage to miss your patch. I did remember the discussion, I remember asking mav@ about what's the best way to hook it up to CAM, but until yesterday I just didn't know the patch (and the PR) existed. Sorry for that. Guess that's what happens when I try to keep up with too many unrelated subprojects at the same time. No worries. Thanks for getting support for this in the tree. I look forward to not rebooting production VMs after a VMDK resize. And while on the subject of VMware+SCSI, it would be great if someone could get the VMware PVSCSI driver into the tree for the 11.0 release. It's sitting in phabricator in review and I'm sure it would be useful to a bunch of FreeBSD users ... https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4112 Thanks, -Matthew ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 0510T1522, Matthew Grooms wrote: > On 11/28/2015 10:03 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: > > On 11/28/2015 6:10 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: > >> On 11/27/2015 7:44 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: > >>> I spent the day looking over the FreeBSD cam and scsi_da source code. > >>> After sprinkling a bunch of printf's around to see what code paths > >>> were being called, It's obvious that Edward was correct in assuming > >>> that ESXi doesn't return any 'Unit Attention' sense information in > >>> response to a 'Read Capacity' request. This kinda makes sense as ESXi > >>> emulates SCSI-2 disk devices and, as far as I can tell, the 0x2A/0x09 > >>> ASC/ASCQ sense code that denotes 'Capacity Data Has Changed' wasn't > >>> defined until the SCSCI-3 spec. It's frustrating that the only way to > >>> get the scsci_da code to call reprobe() is by receiving a command > >>> from the device. Would something like this work? ... > >>> > >>> 1) Register a callback using xpt_register_async( daasync, > >>> AC_REPROBE_DEVICE, path ) that calls reprobe() > >>> 2) Implement a new IOCTL in cam_xpt that camcontrol can call with the > >>> bus:target:lun as the argument > >>> 3) have cam_xpt capture the IOCTL request and call xpt_async( > >>> AC_REPROBE_DEVICE, path ) as a result > >>> > >>> This way users would have the option of manually asking cam to > >>> communicate the new size to geom. The only option now is one or more > >>> reboots to gain access to the increased disk capacity. If this sounds > >>> like a reasonable approach, I'll take a stab at implementing it. > >>> > >> > >> Here is a proof of concept patch. I'm a complete noob when it comes to > >> cam, scsi or freebsd kernel development for that matter, so I'm sure > >> it could have been done a better way. In any case, I added a new > >> command to camcontrol that allows you to specify a bus, target and lun > >> as an argument. For example ... > >> > >> # camcontrol readcap da1 -h > >> Device Size: 32 G, Block Length: 512 bytes > >> > >> # gpart show da1 > >> => 40 58720176 da1 GPT (28G) > >> 40 587201761 freebsd-ufs (28G) > >> > >> Note, I resized the VMDK disk in ESXi. The camcontrol output shows the > >> size as 32G but geom thinks its 28G. > >> > >> # camcontrol devlist > >>at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass0) > >> at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,da0) > >> at scbus2 target 1 lun 0 (pass2,da1) > >> at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (da2,pass3) > >> > >> # camcontrol reprobe 2:1:0 > >> > >> This generates an event that is captured by the scsci da device to > >> forces a reprobe. The kernel output looks almost identical to when the > >> 'Unit Attention' sense data is received ... > >> > >> Nov 28 17:46:13 iscsi-i kernel: (da1:mpt0:0:1:0): Re-probe requested > >> Nov 28 17:46:13 iscsi-i kernel: GEOM_PART: da1 was automatically resized. > >> Nov 28 17:46:13 iscsi-i kernel: Use `gpart commit da1` to save changes > >> or `gpart undo da1` to revert them. > >> > >> Now that geom knows about the increased disk capacity, I can increase > >> the partition size and grow the fs ... > >> > >> [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da1 > >> => 40 67108784 da1 GPT (32G) > >> 40 587201761 freebsd-ufs (28G) > >> 58720216 8388608 - free - (4.0G) > >> > >> # gpart resize -i 1 da1 > >> da1p1 resized > >> > >> # growfs da1p1 > >> Device is mounted read-write; resizing will result in temporary write > >> suspension for /var/data1. > >> It's strongly recommended to make a backup before growing the file > >> system. > >> OK to grow filesystem on /dev/da1p1, mounted on /var/data1, from 28GB > >> to 32GB? [Yes/No] Yes > >> super-block backups (for fsck_ffs -b #) at: > >> 58983232, 60265472, 61547712, 62829952, 64112192, 65394432, 66676672 > >> > >> # df -h > >> FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on > >> /dev/da0p3 18G5.3G 12G31%/ > >> devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev > >> /dev/da1p1 31G 32M 28G 0%/var/data1 > >> /dev/da2p1 15G 32M 14G 0%/var/data2 > >> > >> Sure would be nice to have something like this in the tree. It's > >> really a drag to have to reboot production VMs to increase disk > >> capacity when it could be easily avoided. I'm not sure what the > >> correct IOCTL should look like. Maybe CAMIOCOMMAND is a better way to > >> go? If someone with some experience with the cam/scsi subsystems was > >> willing to give me some direction I'd be willing to try and rewrite > >> the patch in a way that would be commit worthy. I just need some > >> direction. > >> > > > > Ok, last post until I get some feedback. Here's a new version of the > > patch complete with man page updates. It communicates via CAMIOCOMMAND > > instead of introducing a new ioctl value. I tried to model it after the > > device reset option, hopefully with some degree of success. Functionally > > it should be the same as the first patch. > > > > The PR
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 11/28/2015 10:03 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: On 11/28/2015 6:10 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: On 11/27/2015 7:44 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: I spent the day looking over the FreeBSD cam and scsi_da source code. After sprinkling a bunch of printf's around to see what code paths were being called, It's obvious that Edward was correct in assuming that ESXi doesn't return any 'Unit Attention' sense information in response to a 'Read Capacity' request. This kinda makes sense as ESXi emulates SCSI-2 disk devices and, as far as I can tell, the 0x2A/0x09 ASC/ASCQ sense code that denotes 'Capacity Data Has Changed' wasn't defined until the SCSCI-3 spec. It's frustrating that the only way to get the scsci_da code to call reprobe() is by receiving a command from the device. Would something like this work? ... 1) Register a callback using xpt_register_async( daasync, AC_REPROBE_DEVICE, path ) that calls reprobe() 2) Implement a new IOCTL in cam_xpt that camcontrol can call with the bus:target:lun as the argument 3) have cam_xpt capture the IOCTL request and call xpt_async( AC_REPROBE_DEVICE, path ) as a result This way users would have the option of manually asking cam to communicate the new size to geom. The only option now is one or more reboots to gain access to the increased disk capacity. If this sounds like a reasonable approach, I'll take a stab at implementing it. Here is a proof of concept patch. I'm a complete noob when it comes to cam, scsi or freebsd kernel development for that matter, so I'm sure it could have been done a better way. In any case, I added a new command to camcontrol that allows you to specify a bus, target and lun as an argument. For example ... # camcontrol readcap da1 -h Device Size: 32 G, Block Length: 512 bytes # gpart show da1 => 40 58720176 da1 GPT (28G) 40 587201761 freebsd-ufs (28G) Note, I resized the VMDK disk in ESXi. The camcontrol output shows the size as 32G but geom thinks its 28G. # camcontrol devlist at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass0) at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,da0) at scbus2 target 1 lun 0 (pass2,da1) at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (da2,pass3) # camcontrol reprobe 2:1:0 This generates an event that is captured by the scsci da device to forces a reprobe. The kernel output looks almost identical to when the 'Unit Attention' sense data is received ... Nov 28 17:46:13 iscsi-i kernel: (da1:mpt0:0:1:0): Re-probe requested Nov 28 17:46:13 iscsi-i kernel: GEOM_PART: da1 was automatically resized. Nov 28 17:46:13 iscsi-i kernel: Use `gpart commit da1` to save changes or `gpart undo da1` to revert them. Now that geom knows about the increased disk capacity, I can increase the partition size and grow the fs ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da1 => 40 67108784 da1 GPT (32G) 40 587201761 freebsd-ufs (28G) 58720216 8388608 - free - (4.0G) # gpart resize -i 1 da1 da1p1 resized # growfs da1p1 Device is mounted read-write; resizing will result in temporary write suspension for /var/data1. It's strongly recommended to make a backup before growing the file system. OK to grow filesystem on /dev/da1p1, mounted on /var/data1, from 28GB to 32GB? [Yes/No] Yes super-block backups (for fsck_ffs -b #) at: 58983232, 60265472, 61547712, 62829952, 64112192, 65394432, 66676672 # df -h FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0p3 18G5.3G 12G31%/ devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev /dev/da1p1 31G 32M 28G 0%/var/data1 /dev/da2p1 15G 32M 14G 0%/var/data2 Sure would be nice to have something like this in the tree. It's really a drag to have to reboot production VMs to increase disk capacity when it could be easily avoided. I'm not sure what the correct IOCTL should look like. Maybe CAMIOCOMMAND is a better way to go? If someone with some experience with the cam/scsi subsystems was willing to give me some direction I'd be willing to try and rewrite the patch in a way that would be commit worthy. I just need some direction. Ok, last post until I get some feedback. Here's a new version of the patch complete with man page updates. It communicates via CAMIOCOMMAND instead of introducing a new ioctl value. I tried to model it after the device reset option, hopefully with some degree of success. Functionally it should be the same as the first patch. The PR 204901 filed for this can be closed now that the author (ahem) has committed support for the camcontrol reprobe command ... https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204901 https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=866020+0+current/svn-src-head -Matthew ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 11/27/2015 7:44 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: I spent the day looking over the FreeBSD cam and scsi_da source code. After sprinkling a bunch of printf's around to see what code paths were being called, It's obvious that Edward was correct in assuming that ESXi doesn't return any 'Unit Attention' sense information in response to a 'Read Capacity' request. This kinda makes sense as ESXi emulates SCSI-2 disk devices and, as far as I can tell, the 0x2A/0x09 ASC/ASCQ sense code that denotes 'Capacity Data Has Changed' wasn't defined until the SCSCI-3 spec. It's frustrating that the only way to get the scsci_da code to call reprobe() is by receiving a command from the device. Would something like this work? ... 1) Register a callback using xpt_register_async( daasync, AC_REPROBE_DEVICE, path ) that calls reprobe() 2) Implement a new IOCTL in cam_xpt that camcontrol can call with the bus:target:lun as the argument 3) have cam_xpt capture the IOCTL request and call xpt_async( AC_REPROBE_DEVICE, path ) as a result This way users would have the option of manually asking cam to communicate the new size to geom. The only option now is one or more reboots to gain access to the increased disk capacity. If this sounds like a reasonable approach, I'll take a stab at implementing it. Here is a proof of concept patch. I'm a complete noob when it comes to cam, scsi or freebsd kernel development for that matter, so I'm sure it could have been done a better way. In any case, I added a new command to camcontrol that allows you to specify a bus, target and lun as an argument. For example ... # camcontrol readcap da1 -h Device Size: 32 G, Block Length: 512 bytes # gpart show da1 => 40 58720176 da1 GPT (28G) 40 587201761 freebsd-ufs (28G) Note, I resized the VMDK disk in ESXi. The camcontrol output shows the size as 32G but geom thinks its 28G. # camcontrol devlist at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass0) at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,da0) at scbus2 target 1 lun 0 (pass2,da1) at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (da2,pass3) # camcontrol reprobe 2:1:0 This generates an event that is captured by the scsci da device to forces a reprobe. The kernel output looks almost identical to when the 'Unit Attention' sense data is received ... Nov 28 17:46:13 iscsi-i kernel: (da1:mpt0:0:1:0): Re-probe requested Nov 28 17:46:13 iscsi-i kernel: GEOM_PART: da1 was automatically resized. Nov 28 17:46:13 iscsi-i kernel: Use `gpart commit da1` to save changes or `gpart undo da1` to revert them. Now that geom knows about the increased disk capacity, I can increase the partition size and grow the fs ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da1 => 40 67108784 da1 GPT (32G) 40 587201761 freebsd-ufs (28G) 58720216 8388608 - free - (4.0G) # gpart resize -i 1 da1 da1p1 resized # growfs da1p1 Device is mounted read-write; resizing will result in temporary write suspension for /var/data1. It's strongly recommended to make a backup before growing the file system. OK to grow filesystem on /dev/da1p1, mounted on /var/data1, from 28GB to 32GB? [Yes/No] Yes super-block backups (for fsck_ffs -b #) at: 58983232, 60265472, 61547712, 62829952, 64112192, 65394432, 66676672 # df -h FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0p3 18G5.3G 12G31%/ devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev /dev/da1p1 31G 32M 28G 0%/var/data1 /dev/da2p1 15G 32M 14G 0%/var/data2 Sure would be nice to have something like this in the tree. It's really a drag to have to reboot production VMs to increase disk capacity when it could be easily avoided. I'm not sure what the correct IOCTL should look like. Maybe CAMIOCOMMAND is a better way to go? If someone with some experience with the cam/scsi subsystems was willing to give me some direction I'd be willing to try and rewrite the patch in a way that would be commit worthy. I just need some direction. Thanks, -Matthew Index: lib/libcam/camlib.c === --- lib/libcam/camlib.c (revision 291390) +++ lib/libcam/camlib.c (working copy) @@ -752,3 +752,41 @@ bcopy(src, dst, sizeof(struct cam_device)); } + +/* + * Send a reprobe unit request for a given bus, target and lun + */ +int +cam_reprobe_btl(path_id_t path_id, target_id_t target_id, lun_id_t target_lun) +{ + int fd; + char *func_name = "cam_reprobe_btl"; + union ccb ccb; + + if ((fd = open(XPT_DEVICE, O_RDWR)) < 0) { + snprintf(cam_errbuf, CAM_ERRBUF_SIZE, +"%s: couldn't open %s\n%s: %s", func_name, XPT_DEVICE, +func_name, strerror(errno)); + return(-1); + } + + /* Setup our request ccb */ + bzero(_h, sizeof(struct ccb_hdr)); + ccb.ccb_h.path_id = path_id; +
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 11/28/2015 6:10 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: On 11/27/2015 7:44 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: I spent the day looking over the FreeBSD cam and scsi_da source code. After sprinkling a bunch of printf's around to see what code paths were being called, It's obvious that Edward was correct in assuming that ESXi doesn't return any 'Unit Attention' sense information in response to a 'Read Capacity' request. This kinda makes sense as ESXi emulates SCSI-2 disk devices and, as far as I can tell, the 0x2A/0x09 ASC/ASCQ sense code that denotes 'Capacity Data Has Changed' wasn't defined until the SCSCI-3 spec. It's frustrating that the only way to get the scsci_da code to call reprobe() is by receiving a command from the device. Would something like this work? ... 1) Register a callback using xpt_register_async( daasync, AC_REPROBE_DEVICE, path ) that calls reprobe() 2) Implement a new IOCTL in cam_xpt that camcontrol can call with the bus:target:lun as the argument 3) have cam_xpt capture the IOCTL request and call xpt_async( AC_REPROBE_DEVICE, path ) as a result This way users would have the option of manually asking cam to communicate the new size to geom. The only option now is one or more reboots to gain access to the increased disk capacity. If this sounds like a reasonable approach, I'll take a stab at implementing it. Here is a proof of concept patch. I'm a complete noob when it comes to cam, scsi or freebsd kernel development for that matter, so I'm sure it could have been done a better way. In any case, I added a new command to camcontrol that allows you to specify a bus, target and lun as an argument. For example ... # camcontrol readcap da1 -h Device Size: 32 G, Block Length: 512 bytes # gpart show da1 => 40 58720176 da1 GPT (28G) 40 587201761 freebsd-ufs (28G) Note, I resized the VMDK disk in ESXi. The camcontrol output shows the size as 32G but geom thinks its 28G. # camcontrol devlist at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass0) at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,da0) at scbus2 target 1 lun 0 (pass2,da1) at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (da2,pass3) # camcontrol reprobe 2:1:0 This generates an event that is captured by the scsci da device to forces a reprobe. The kernel output looks almost identical to when the 'Unit Attention' sense data is received ... Nov 28 17:46:13 iscsi-i kernel: (da1:mpt0:0:1:0): Re-probe requested Nov 28 17:46:13 iscsi-i kernel: GEOM_PART: da1 was automatically resized. Nov 28 17:46:13 iscsi-i kernel: Use `gpart commit da1` to save changes or `gpart undo da1` to revert them. Now that geom knows about the increased disk capacity, I can increase the partition size and grow the fs ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da1 => 40 67108784 da1 GPT (32G) 40 587201761 freebsd-ufs (28G) 58720216 8388608 - free - (4.0G) # gpart resize -i 1 da1 da1p1 resized # growfs da1p1 Device is mounted read-write; resizing will result in temporary write suspension for /var/data1. It's strongly recommended to make a backup before growing the file system. OK to grow filesystem on /dev/da1p1, mounted on /var/data1, from 28GB to 32GB? [Yes/No] Yes super-block backups (for fsck_ffs -b #) at: 58983232, 60265472, 61547712, 62829952, 64112192, 65394432, 66676672 # df -h FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0p3 18G5.3G 12G31%/ devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev /dev/da1p1 31G 32M 28G 0%/var/data1 /dev/da2p1 15G 32M 14G 0%/var/data2 Sure would be nice to have something like this in the tree. It's really a drag to have to reboot production VMs to increase disk capacity when it could be easily avoided. I'm not sure what the correct IOCTL should look like. Maybe CAMIOCOMMAND is a better way to go? If someone with some experience with the cam/scsi subsystems was willing to give me some direction I'd be willing to try and rewrite the patch in a way that would be commit worthy. I just need some direction. Ok, last post until I get some feedback. Here's a new version of the patch complete with man page updates. It communicates via CAMIOCOMMAND instead of introducing a new ioctl value. I tried to model it after the device reset option, hopefully with some degree of success. Functionally it should be the same as the first patch. Thanks, -Matthew Index: sbin/camcontrol/camcontrol.8 === --- sbin/camcontrol/camcontrol.8(revision 291390) +++ sbin/camcontrol/camcontrol.8(working copy) @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ .Ic reset .Aq all | bus Ns Op :target:lun .Nm +.Ic reprobe +.Aq bus:target:lun +.Nm .Ic defects .Op device id .Op generic args @@ -548,6 +551,9 @@ connecting to that device. Note that this can have a destructive impact on the system. +.It Ic reprobe +Tell the kernel to re-probe the given
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 11/27/2015 12:08 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: On 11/27/2015 3:16 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 27-11-2015 06:59, Matthew Grooms wrote: All, I know this is a very late follow up, but spent some more time looking at this today and found some additional information that I found quite interesting. I setup two VMs, one that acts as an iSCSI initiator ( CURRENT ) and another that acts as a target ( 10.2-RELEASE ). Both are running under ESXi v5.5. There are two block devices on the initiator, da1 and da2, that I used for resize testing ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol devlist at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass0) at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,da0) at scbus2 target 1 lun 0 (pass2,da1) at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (da2,pass3) The da1 device is a virtual disk hanging off of a VMware virtual SAS controller ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# pciconf ... mpt0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x010700 card=0x197615ad chip=0x00541000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'LSI Logic / Symbios Logic' device = 'SAS1068 PCI-X Fusion-MPT SAS' class = mass storage subclass = SAS [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol readcap da1 -h Device Size: 10 G, Block Length: 512 bytes [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da1 => 40 20971440 da1 GPT (10G) 40 209714401 freebsd-ufs (10G) The da2 device is an iSCSI LUN mounted from my FreeBSD 10.2 VM running ctld ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# iscsictl Target name Target portalState iqn.2015-01.lab.shrew:target0iscsi-t.shrew.lab Connected: da2 [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol readcap da2 -h Device Size: 10 G, Block Length: 512 bytes [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da2 => 40 20971440 da2 GPT (10G) 4024 - free - (12K) 64 209713921 freebsd-ufs (10G) 2097145624 - free - (12K) When I increased the size of da1 ( the VMDK ) and then re-ran 'camcontrol readcap' without a reboot, it clearly showed that the disk size had increased. However, geom failed to recognize the additional capacity ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol readcap da1 -h Device Size: 16 G, Block Length: 512 bytes [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da1 => 40 20971440 da1 GPT (10G) 40 209714401 freebsd-ufs (10G) Here is the interesting bit. I increased the size of da2 by modifying the lun size in ctld.conf on the target and then issued a /etc/rd.d/ctld reload. When I re-ran 'camcontrol readcap' on the initiator without a reboot, it also showed that the disk size had increased, but this time geom recognized the additional capacity as well ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol readcap da2 -h Device Size: 16 G, Block Length: 512 bytes [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da2 => 40 33554352 da2 GPT (16G) 4024 - free - (12K) 64 209713921 freebsd-ufs (10G) 20971456 12582936 - free - (6.0G) I was then able to resize the partition and then grow the UFS filesystem, all without rebooting the VM ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart resize -i 1 da2 da2p1 resized [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da2 => 40 33554352 da2 GPT (16G) 4024 - free - (12K) 64 335543041 freebsd-ufs (16G) 3355436824 - free - (12K) [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# growfs da2p1 Device is mounted read-write; resizing will result in temporary write suspension for /var/data2. It's strongly recommended to make a backup before growing the file system. OK to grow filesystem on /dev/da2p1, mounted on /var/data2, from 10GB to 16GB? [Yes/No] Yes super-block backups (for fsck_ffs -b #) at: 21798272, 23080512, 24362752, 25644992, 26927232, 28209472, 29491712, 30773952, 32056192, 8432 [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# df -h FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0p3 15G1.2G 12G 9%/ devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev /dev/da1p19.7G 32M8.9G 0%/var/data1 /dev/da2p1 15G 32M 14G 0%/var/data2 It's also worth noting that the additional space was not recognized by gpart/geom on the initiator until after the 'camcontrol readcap da2' command was run. In other words, I'm skeptical that it was a Unit Attention notification that made the right thing happen since it still took manual prodding of cam to get the new disk geometry up into the geom layer. I remember doing this for a bhyve VM, and had the type same problem. Getting gpart in the VM to actually pickup the new size required some extra prodding (I like that word) or rebooting the VM. I can remember reporting this: tpoic: "resampeling of a ZVOL that has been resized" and getting a fix from Andrey V. Elsukov... Index: head/sys/geom/part/g_part_gpt.c
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 11/27/2015 3:16 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 27-11-2015 06:59, Matthew Grooms wrote: On 10/16/2014 3:10 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: On 1010T1529, Matthew Grooms wrote: All, I am a long time user and advocate of FreeBSD and manage a several deployments of FreeBSD in a few data centers. Now that these environments are almost always virtual, it would make sense that FreeBSD support for basic features such as dynamic disk resizing. It looks like most of the parts are intended to work. Kudos to the FreeBSD foundation for seeing the need and sponsoring dynamic increase of online UFS filesystems via growfs. Unfortunately, it would appear that there are still problems in this area, such as ... a) cam/geom recognizing when a drive's size has increased b) zpool recognizing when a gpt partition size has increased For example, if I do an install of FreeBSD 10 on VMware using ZFS, I see the following ... root@zpool-test:~ # gpart show => 34 16777149 da0 GPT (8.0G) 34 10241 freebsd-boot (512K) 1058 41943042 freebsd-swap (2.0G) 4195362 125818213 freebsd-zfs (6.0G) If I increase the VM disk size using VMware to 16G and rescan using camcontrol, this is what I see ... "camcontrol rescan" does not force fetching the updated disk size. AFAIK there is no way to do that. However, this should happen automatically, if the "other side" properly sends proper Unit Attention after resizing. No idea why this doesn't happen with VMWare. Reboot obviously clears things up. [..] Now I want the claim the additional 14 gigs of space for my zpool ... root@zpool-test:~ # zpool status pool: zroot state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 ONLINE 0 0 0 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool set autoexpand=on zroot root@zpool-test:~ # zpool online -e zroot gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zroot 5.97G 876M 5.11G14% 1.00x ONLINE - The zpool appears to still only have 5.11G free. Lets reboot and try again ... Interesting. This used to work; actually either of those (autoexpand or online -e) should do the trick. root@zpool-test:~ # zpool set autoexpand=on zroot root@zpool-test:~ # zpool online -e zroot gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zroot 14.0G 876M 13.1G 6% 1.00x ONLINE - Now I have 13.1G free. I can add this space to any of my zfs volumes and it picks the change up immediately. So the question remains, why do I need to reboot the OS twice to allocate new disk space to a volume? FreeBSD is first and foremost a server operating system. Servers are commonly deployed in data centers. Virtual environments are now commonplace in data centers, not the exception to the rule. VMware still has the vast majority of the private virutal environment market. I assume that most would expect things like this to work out of the box. Did I miss a required step or is this fixed in CURRENT? Looks like genuine bugs (or rather, one missing feature and one bug). Filling PRs for those might be a good idea. All, I know this is a very late follow up, but spent some more time looking at this today and found some additional information that I found quite interesting. I setup two VMs, one that acts as an iSCSI initiator ( CURRENT ) and another that acts as a target ( 10.2-RELEASE ). Both are running under ESXi v5.5. There are two block devices on the initiator, da1 and da2, that I used for resize testing ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol devlist at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass0) at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,da0) at scbus2 target 1 lun 0 (pass2,da1) at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (da2,pass3) The da1 device is a virtual disk hanging off of a VMware virtual SAS controller ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# pciconf ... mpt0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x010700 card=0x197615ad chip=0x00541000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'LSI Logic / Symbios Logic' device = 'SAS1068 PCI-X Fusion-MPT SAS' class = mass storage subclass = SAS [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol readcap da1 -h Device Size: 10 G, Block Length: 512 bytes [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da1 => 40 20971440 da1 GPT (10G) 40 209714401 freebsd-ufs (10G) The da2 device is an iSCSI LUN mounted from my FreeBSD 10.2 VM running ctld ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# iscsictl Target name Target portalState iqn.2015-01.lab.shrew:target0iscsi-t.shrew.lab Connected: da2 [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol readcap da2 -h Device Size: 10 G, Block Length: 512 bytes [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da2 =>
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 11/27/2015 12:56 PM, Matthew Grooms wrote: I thought it would be useful to get more output from the geom layer, similar to the camcontrol debug output ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=0x81 When I resize the iSCSI LUN and run the 'camcontrol readcap da2 -h', I see this in the log output ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# tail -f /var/log/messages ... Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: (pass3:iscsi1:0:0:0): Capacity data has changed Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: g_post_event_x(0x80973850, 0xf80003f4e000, 1, 0) Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: g_post_event_x(0x8097a6b0, 0xf80003f42b60, 2, 0) Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: g_resize_provider_event(0xf800038c6700) Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: g_part_resize(da2) Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: GEOM_PART: da2 was automatically resized. Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: Use `gpart commit da2` to save changes or `gpart undo da2` to revert them. Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: g_raid_taste(RAID, da2) Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: g_attach(0xf80003e64780, 0xf800038c6700) Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: g_detach(0xf80003e64780) Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: g_destroy_consumer(0xf80003e64780) Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: g_destroy_geom(0xf800038c9c00(raid:taste)) Nov 27 12:20:07 iscsi-i kernel: g_label_taste(LABEL, da2) However, when I resize the VMDK disk and run the 'camcontrol readcap da1 -h' command, I see nothing in the log output. So it would appear that even though cam is reporting the new capacity in the command line output, the this info is not being forwarded to geom in this case. Maybe the VMware virtual SAS device ( mpt0 ) isn't reporting some special capability bit to cam which causes it to squelch the info? I'm not sure if this is useful but here is what the device info looks like at boot time ... mpt0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xfd4ec000-0xfd4e,0xfd4f-0xfd4f irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci3 mpt0: MPI Version=1.5.0.0 ... da0 at mpt0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 300.000MB/s transfers da0: Command Queueing enabled da0: 20480MB (41943040 512 byte sectors) da0: quirks=0x40 da1 at mpt0 bus 0 scbus2 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 300.000MB/s transfers da1: Command Queueing enabled da1: 20480MB (41943040 512 byte sectors) da1: quirks=0x40 ... da2 at iscsi1 bus 0 scbus3 target 0 lun 0 da2: Fixed Direct Access SPC-4 SCSI device da2: Serial Number MYSERIAL 0 da2: 150.000MB/s transfers da2: Command Queueing enabled da2: 16384MB (33554432 512 byte sectors) I spent the day looking over the FreeBSD cam and scsi_da source code. After sprinkling a bunch of printf's around to see what code paths were being called, It's obvious that Edward was correct in assuming that ESXi doesn't return any 'Unit Attention' sense information in response to a 'Read Capacity' request. This kinda makes sense as ESXi emulates SCSI-2 disk devices and, as far as I can tell, the 0x2A/0x09 ASC/ASCQ sense code that denotes 'Capacity Data Has Changed' wasn't defined until the SCSCI-3 spec. It's frustrating that the only way to get the scsci_da code to call reprobe() is by receiving a command from the device. Would something like this work? ... 1) Register a callback using xpt_register_async( daasync, AC_REPROBE_DEVICE, path ) that calls reprobe() 2) Implement a new IOCTL in cam_xpt that camcontrol can call with the bus:target:lun as the argument 3) have cam_xpt capture the IOCTL request and call xpt_async( AC_REPROBE_DEVICE, path ) as a result This way users would have the option of manually asking cam to communicate the new size to geom. The only option now is one or more reboots to gain access to the increased disk capacity. If this sounds like a reasonable approach, I'll take a stab at implementing it. Thanks, -Matthew ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 27-11-2015 06:59, Matthew Grooms wrote: On 10/16/2014 3:10 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: On 1010T1529, Matthew Grooms wrote: All, I am a long time user and advocate of FreeBSD and manage a several deployments of FreeBSD in a few data centers. Now that these environments are almost always virtual, it would make sense that FreeBSD support for basic features such as dynamic disk resizing. It looks like most of the parts are intended to work. Kudos to the FreeBSD foundation for seeing the need and sponsoring dynamic increase of online UFS filesystems via growfs. Unfortunately, it would appear that there are still problems in this area, such as ... a) cam/geom recognizing when a drive's size has increased b) zpool recognizing when a gpt partition size has increased For example, if I do an install of FreeBSD 10 on VMware using ZFS, I see the following ... root@zpool-test:~ # gpart show => 34 16777149 da0 GPT (8.0G) 34 10241 freebsd-boot (512K) 1058 41943042 freebsd-swap (2.0G) 4195362 125818213 freebsd-zfs (6.0G) If I increase the VM disk size using VMware to 16G and rescan using camcontrol, this is what I see ... "camcontrol rescan" does not force fetching the updated disk size. AFAIK there is no way to do that. However, this should happen automatically, if the "other side" properly sends proper Unit Attention after resizing. No idea why this doesn't happen with VMWare. Reboot obviously clears things up. [..] Now I want the claim the additional 14 gigs of space for my zpool ... root@zpool-test:~ # zpool status pool: zroot state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 ONLINE 0 0 0 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool set autoexpand=on zroot root@zpool-test:~ # zpool online -e zroot gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zroot 5.97G 876M 5.11G14% 1.00x ONLINE - The zpool appears to still only have 5.11G free. Lets reboot and try again ... Interesting. This used to work; actually either of those (autoexpand or online -e) should do the trick. root@zpool-test:~ # zpool set autoexpand=on zroot root@zpool-test:~ # zpool online -e zroot gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zroot 14.0G 876M 13.1G 6% 1.00x ONLINE - Now I have 13.1G free. I can add this space to any of my zfs volumes and it picks the change up immediately. So the question remains, why do I need to reboot the OS twice to allocate new disk space to a volume? FreeBSD is first and foremost a server operating system. Servers are commonly deployed in data centers. Virtual environments are now commonplace in data centers, not the exception to the rule. VMware still has the vast majority of the private virutal environment market. I assume that most would expect things like this to work out of the box. Did I miss a required step or is this fixed in CURRENT? Looks like genuine bugs (or rather, one missing feature and one bug). Filling PRs for those might be a good idea. All, I know this is a very late follow up, but spent some more time looking at this today and found some additional information that I found quite interesting. I setup two VMs, one that acts as an iSCSI initiator ( CURRENT ) and another that acts as a target ( 10.2-RELEASE ). Both are running under ESXi v5.5. There are two block devices on the initiator, da1 and da2, that I used for resize testing ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol devlist at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass0) at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,da0) at scbus2 target 1 lun 0 (pass2,da1) at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (da2,pass3) The da1 device is a virtual disk hanging off of a VMware virtual SAS controller ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# pciconf ... mpt0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x010700 card=0x197615ad chip=0x00541000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'LSI Logic / Symbios Logic' device = 'SAS1068 PCI-X Fusion-MPT SAS' class = mass storage subclass = SAS [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol readcap da1 -h Device Size: 10 G, Block Length: 512 bytes [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da1 => 40 20971440 da1 GPT (10G) 40 209714401 freebsd-ufs (10G) The da2 device is an iSCSI LUN mounted from my FreeBSD 10.2 VM running ctld ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# iscsictl Target name Target portalState iqn.2015-01.lab.shrew:target0iscsi-t.shrew.lab Connected: da2 [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol readcap da2 -h Device Size: 10 G, Block Length: 512 bytes [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]#
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 10/16/2014 3:10 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: On 1010T1529, Matthew Grooms wrote: All, I am a long time user and advocate of FreeBSD and manage a several deployments of FreeBSD in a few data centers. Now that these environments are almost always virtual, it would make sense that FreeBSD support for basic features such as dynamic disk resizing. It looks like most of the parts are intended to work. Kudos to the FreeBSD foundation for seeing the need and sponsoring dynamic increase of online UFS filesystems via growfs. Unfortunately, it would appear that there are still problems in this area, such as ... a) cam/geom recognizing when a drive's size has increased b) zpool recognizing when a gpt partition size has increased For example, if I do an install of FreeBSD 10 on VMware using ZFS, I see the following ... root@zpool-test:~ # gpart show => 34 16777149 da0 GPT (8.0G) 34 10241 freebsd-boot (512K) 1058 41943042 freebsd-swap (2.0G) 4195362 125818213 freebsd-zfs (6.0G) If I increase the VM disk size using VMware to 16G and rescan using camcontrol, this is what I see ... "camcontrol rescan" does not force fetching the updated disk size. AFAIK there is no way to do that. However, this should happen automatically, if the "other side" properly sends proper Unit Attention after resizing. No idea why this doesn't happen with VMWare. Reboot obviously clears things up. [..] Now I want the claim the additional 14 gigs of space for my zpool ... root@zpool-test:~ # zpool status pool: zroot state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 ONLINE 0 0 0 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool set autoexpand=on zroot root@zpool-test:~ # zpool online -e zroot gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zroot 5.97G 876M 5.11G14% 1.00x ONLINE - The zpool appears to still only have 5.11G free. Lets reboot and try again ... Interesting. This used to work; actually either of those (autoexpand or online -e) should do the trick. root@zpool-test:~ # zpool set autoexpand=on zroot root@zpool-test:~ # zpool online -e zroot gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zroot 14.0G 876M 13.1G 6% 1.00x ONLINE - Now I have 13.1G free. I can add this space to any of my zfs volumes and it picks the change up immediately. So the question remains, why do I need to reboot the OS twice to allocate new disk space to a volume? FreeBSD is first and foremost a server operating system. Servers are commonly deployed in data centers. Virtual environments are now commonplace in data centers, not the exception to the rule. VMware still has the vast majority of the private virutal environment market. I assume that most would expect things like this to work out of the box. Did I miss a required step or is this fixed in CURRENT? Looks like genuine bugs (or rather, one missing feature and one bug). Filling PRs for those might be a good idea. All, I know this is a very late follow up, but spent some more time looking at this today and found some additional information that I found quite interesting. I setup two VMs, one that acts as an iSCSI initiator ( CURRENT ) and another that acts as a target ( 10.2-RELEASE ). Both are running under ESXi v5.5. There are two block devices on the initiator, da1 and da2, that I used for resize testing ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol devlist at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass0) at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,da0) at scbus2 target 1 lun 0 (pass2,da1) at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (da2,pass3) The da1 device is a virtual disk hanging off of a VMware virtual SAS controller ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# pciconf ... mpt0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x010700 card=0x197615ad chip=0x00541000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'LSI Logic / Symbios Logic' device = 'SAS1068 PCI-X Fusion-MPT SAS' class = mass storage subclass = SAS [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol readcap da1 -h Device Size: 10 G, Block Length: 512 bytes [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da1 => 40 20971440 da1 GPT (10G) 40 209714401 freebsd-ufs (10G) The da2 device is an iSCSI LUN mounted from my FreeBSD 10.2 VM running ctld ... [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# iscsictl Target name Target portalState iqn.2015-01.lab.shrew:target0iscsi-t.shrew.lab Connected: da2 [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# camcontrol readcap da2 -h Device Size: 10 G, Block Length: 512 bytes [root@iscsi-i /home/mgrooms]# gpart show da2 => 40
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 10/16/2014 3:17 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Oct 16, 2014, at 1:10, Edward Tomasz Napierała tr...@freebsd.org wrote: camcontrol rescan does not force fetching the updated disk size. AFAIK there is no way to do that. However, this should happen automatically, if the other side properly sends proper Unit Attention after resizing. No idea why this doesn't happen with VMWare. Reboot obviously clears things up. [..] Is open-vm-tools installed? I ask because if I don't have it installed and the kernel modules loaded, VMware doesn't notify the guest OS of disks being added/removed. VMware tools were not installed at the time. I'll try that, but I doubt it will make a difference for resizing. Also, what disk controller are you using? The ESXi 5.5 default controller for FreeBSD, LSI Logic Parallel ... mpt0@pci0:0:16:0: class=0x01 card=0x197615ad chip=0x00301000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'LSI Logic / Symbios Logic' device = '53c1030 PCI-X Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI' class = mass storage subclass = SCSI I'll try it with the LSI Logic SAS controller as well to see if that makes a difference. -Matthew ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 1010T1529, Matthew Grooms wrote: All, I am a long time user and advocate of FreeBSD and manage a several deployments of FreeBSD in a few data centers. Now that these environments are almost always virtual, it would make sense that FreeBSD support for basic features such as dynamic disk resizing. It looks like most of the parts are intended to work. Kudos to the FreeBSD foundation for seeing the need and sponsoring dynamic increase of online UFS filesystems via growfs. Unfortunately, it would appear that there are still problems in this area, such as ... a) cam/geom recognizing when a drive's size has increased b) zpool recognizing when a gpt partition size has increased For example, if I do an install of FreeBSD 10 on VMware using ZFS, I see the following ... root@zpool-test:~ # gpart show = 34 16777149 da0 GPT (8.0G) 34 10241 freebsd-boot (512K) 1058 41943042 freebsd-swap (2.0G) 4195362 125818213 freebsd-zfs (6.0G) If I increase the VM disk size using VMware to 16G and rescan using camcontrol, this is what I see ... camcontrol rescan does not force fetching the updated disk size. AFAIK there is no way to do that. However, this should happen automatically, if the other side properly sends proper Unit Attention after resizing. No idea why this doesn't happen with VMWare. Reboot obviously clears things up. [..] Now I want the claim the additional 14 gigs of space for my zpool ... root@zpool-test:~ # zpool status pool: zroot state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 ONLINE 0 0 0 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool set autoexpand=on zroot root@zpool-test:~ # zpool online -e zroot gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zroot 5.97G 876M 5.11G14% 1.00x ONLINE - The zpool appears to still only have 5.11G free. Lets reboot and try again ... Interesting. This used to work; actually either of those (autoexpand or online -e) should do the trick. root@zpool-test:~ # zpool set autoexpand=on zroot root@zpool-test:~ # zpool online -e zroot gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zroot 14.0G 876M 13.1G 6% 1.00x ONLINE - Now I have 13.1G free. I can add this space to any of my zfs volumes and it picks the change up immediately. So the question remains, why do I need to reboot the OS twice to allocate new disk space to a volume? FreeBSD is first and foremost a server operating system. Servers are commonly deployed in data centers. Virtual environments are now commonplace in data centers, not the exception to the rule. VMware still has the vast majority of the private virutal environment market. I assume that most would expect things like this to work out of the box. Did I miss a required step or is this fixed in CURRENT? Looks like genuine bugs (or rather, one missing feature and one bug). Filling PRs for those might be a good idea. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On Oct 16, 2014, at 1:10, Edward Tomasz Napierała tr...@freebsd.org wrote: camcontrol rescan does not force fetching the updated disk size. AFAIK there is no way to do that. However, this should happen automatically, if the other side properly sends proper Unit Attention after resizing. No idea why this doesn't happen with VMWare. Reboot obviously clears things up. [..] Is open-vm-tools installed? I ask because if I don't have it installed and the kernel modules loaded, VMware doesn't notify the guest OS of disks being added/removed. Also, what disk controller are you using? Cheers. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
On 2014-10-16 04:17, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Oct 16, 2014, at 1:10, Edward Tomasz Napierała tr...@freebsd.org wrote: camcontrol rescan does not force fetching the updated disk size. AFAIK there is no way to do that. However, this should happen automatically, if the other side properly sends proper Unit Attention after resizing. No idea why this doesn't happen with VMWare. Reboot obviously clears things up. [..] Is open-vm-tools installed? I ask because if I don't have it installed and the kernel modules loaded, VMware doesn't notify the guest OS of disks being added/removed. Also, what disk controller are you using? Cheers. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I duplicated this behavior. According to gpart The virtual disk does not grow until the freebsd guest is rebooted. FreeBSD freebsd10 10.0-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p6 #0: Tue Jun 24 07:47:37 UTC 2014 r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC pkg info -- amd64 open-vm-tools-nox11-1280544_8,1 Open VMware tools for FreeBSD VMware guests ESXi reported -- Running, version:2147483647 (3rd-party/Independent) ESXi-5.5-1331820(A00) Guest Hardware version 10 789 - S 0:00.54 /usr/local/bin/vmtoolsd -c /usr/local/share/vmware-tools/ Id Refs AddressSize Name 1 12 0x8020 15f03b0 kernel 21 0x81a12000 5209 fdescfs.ko 31 0x81a18000 2198 vmmemctl.ko 41 0x81a1b000 23d8 vmxnet.ko 51 0x81a1e000 2bf0 vmblock.ko 61 0x81a21000 81b4 vmhgfs.ko --mikej ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Resizing a zpool as a VMware ESXi guest ...
All, I am a long time user and advocate of FreeBSD and manage a several deployments of FreeBSD in a few data centers. Now that these environments are almost always virtual, it would make sense that FreeBSD support for basic features such as dynamic disk resizing. It looks like most of the parts are intended to work. Kudos to the FreeBSD foundation for seeing the need and sponsoring dynamic increase of online UFS filesystems via growfs. Unfortunately, it would appear that there are still problems in this area, such as ... a) cam/geom recognizing when a drive's size has increased b) zpool recognizing when a gpt partition size has increased For example, if I do an install of FreeBSD 10 on VMware using ZFS, I see the following ... root@zpool-test:~ # gpart show = 34 16777149 da0 GPT (8.0G) 34 10241 freebsd-boot (512K) 1058 41943042 freebsd-swap (2.0G) 4195362 125818213 freebsd-zfs (6.0G) If I increase the VM disk size using VMware to 16G and rescan using camcontrol, this is what I see ... root@zpool-test:~ # camcontrol rescan all Re-scan of bus 0 was successful Re-scan of bus 1 was successful Re-scan of bus 2 was successful root@zpool-test:~ # gpart show = 34 16777149 da0 GPT (8.0G) 34 10241 freebsd-boot (512K) 1058 41943042 freebsd-swap (2.0G) 4195362 125818213 freebsd-zfs (6.0G) The GPT label still appears to be 8G. If I reboot the VM, it picks up the correct size ... root@zpool-test:~ # gpart show = 34 16777149 da0 GPT (16G) [CORRUPT] 34 10241 freebsd-boot (512K) 1058 41943042 freebsd-swap (2.0G) 4195362 125818213 freebsd-zfs (6.0G) Now I have 16G to play with. I'll expand the freebsd-zfs partition to claim the additional space ... root@zpool-test:~ # gpart recover da0 da0 recovered root@zpool-test:~ # gpart show = 34 33554365 da0 GPT (16G) 34 10241 freebsd-boot (512K) 1058 41943042 freebsd-swap (2.0G) 4195362 125818213 freebsd-zfs (6.0G) 16777183 16777216 - free - (8.0G) root@zpool-test:~ # gpart resize -i 3 da0 root@zpool-test:~ # gpart show = 34 33554365 da0 GPT (16G) 34 10241 freebsd-boot (512K) 1058 41943042 freebsd-swap (2.0G) 4195362 293590373 freebsd-zfs (14G) Now I want the claim the additional 14 gigs of space for my zpool ... root@zpool-test:~ # zpool status pool: zroot state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 ONLINE 0 0 0 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool set autoexpand=on zroot root@zpool-test:~ # zpool online -e zroot gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zroot 5.97G 876M 5.11G14% 1.00x ONLINE - The zpool appears to still only have 5.11G free. Lets reboot and try again ... root@zpool-test:~ # zpool set autoexpand=on zroot root@zpool-test:~ # zpool online -e zroot gptid/352086bd-50b5-11e4-95b8-0050569b2a04 root@zpool-test:~ # zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT zroot 14.0G 876M 13.1G 6% 1.00x ONLINE - Now I have 13.1G free. I can add this space to any of my zfs volumes and it picks the change up immediately. So the question remains, why do I need to reboot the OS twice to allocate new disk space to a volume? FreeBSD is first and foremost a server operating system. Servers are commonly deployed in data centers. Virtual environments are now commonplace in data centers, not the exception to the rule. VMware still has the vast majority of the private virutal environment market. I assume that most would expect things like this to work out of the box. Did I miss a required step or is this fixed in CURRENT? Thanks, -Matthew ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org