On Wednesday, 8 October 2003 at 2:08:55 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Sam Leffler wrote:
>
>> It reliably locks up for me when you break into a running system; set a
>> breakpoint; and then continue. Machine is UP+HTT. Haven't tried other
>> machines.
>
> This seems to be bec
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Sam Leffler wrote:
> It reliably locks up for me when you break into a running system; set a
> breakpoint; and then continue. Machine is UP+HTT. Haven't tried other
> machines.
This seems to be because rev.1.75 of db_interface.c disturbed some much
larger bugs related to th
On Tuesday, 30 September 2003 at 16:13:09 -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Sam Leffler writes:
>> It reliably locks up for me when you break into a running system; set a
>> breakpoint; and then continue. Machine is UP+HTT. Haven't tried other
>> machines.
>
> Perhaps related, perhaps a red-herri
Sam Leffler writes:
> It reliably locks up for me when you break into a running system; set a
> breakpoint; and then continue. Machine is UP+HTT. Haven't tried other
> machines.
Perhaps related, perhaps a red-herring: With a single P4 + HTT, +
SMP kernel, if I break into the ddb debugger
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 04:01 am, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 30 September 2003 at 16:23:35 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > >> After building a new kernel, remote serial gdb no longer w
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 September 2003 at 16:23:35 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> >
> >> After building a new kernel, remote serial gdb no longer works. When
> >> I issue a 'continue' command, I lose control
On Tuesday, 30 September 2003 at 16:23:35 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> After building a new kernel, remote serial gdb no longer works. When
>> I issue a 'continue' command, I lose control of the system, but it
>> doesn't continue running. Has an
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> After building a new kernel, remote serial gdb no longer works. When
> I issue a 'continue' command, I lose control of the system, but it
> doesn't continue running. Has anybody else seen this?
It works as well as it did a few months ago here.
On Monday 29 September 2003 01:30 am, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> After building a new kernel, remote serial gdb no longer works. When
> I issue a 'continue' command, I lose control of the system, but it
> doesn't continue running. Has anybody else seen this?
Yes, I noticed this late last week.
After building a new kernel, remote serial gdb no longer works. When
I issue a 'continue' command, I lose control of the system, but it
doesn't continue running. Has anybody else seen this?
Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
NOTE: Due to the currently active Microsoft-ba
10 matches
Mail list logo