Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:43:53 +1100 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kirk McKusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Trashed Disk Labels
In-Reply-To: <[
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> I have had a report of a disk label getting trashed after booting
> up to a kernel with the new UFS2 superblock format. I have just
> checked in an update to ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c (version 1.198) that
> explicitly checks to make sure that it will not tras
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:53:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kirk McKusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Trashed Disk Labels
X-ASK-Info: Confirmed by User
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, K
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:53:06 -0500 (EST)
Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:
>
> > I have had a report of a disk label getting trashed after booting
> > up to a kernel with the new UFS2 superblock format. I have just
> > checked in an update to ufs
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> I have had a report of a disk label getting trashed after booting
> up to a kernel with the new UFS2 superblock format. I have just
> checked in an update to ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c (version 1.198) that
> explicitly checks to make sure that it will not tras
If you have updated your kernel sources on or after Nov 27th,
and are running with ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c version 1.197, this
message applies to you.
I have had a report of a disk label getting trashed after booting
up to a kernel with the new UFS2 superblock format. I have just
checked in an update
