On 1 Mar, Donn Miller wrote:
> It looks like SHMMAXPGS has to be a power of two + 1. (The original
No.
> config file says
>
> options SHMMAX="(SHMMAXPGS*PAGE_SIZE+1)"
> options SHMMAXPGS=1025
Thats from LINT.
> So, it looks like SHMMAXPGS has to be a power of two + 1. Tha
> Try increasing SHMSEG to 128.
Appears to be working fine with SHMAXPGS=4097 and SHMSEG=128 - fingers
crossed ;) Thanks for your help everyone...
Cliff Rowley
- while (!asleep) { code(); }
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Cliff Rowley wrote:
> > options SHMMAXPGS=4096
> > options SHMALL=16384
> > options SHMSEG=16
> > options SEMMNI=32
> > options SEMMNS=128
>
> Tried those, same error :(
>
> _XF86BigfontQueryFont: could not attach shm segment
Try incr
On 1 Mar 2000, Thomas Graichen wrote:
> > "XFree86-BigFont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24"
>
> with those options the error is gone for me - i think the relevant
> one is the SHMALL (the others are for postgres) - i found this out
> by simply reading the piece of source of XF
On 1 Mar 2000, Thomas Graichen wrote:
> > Basically, does your mouse work under syscons? That's the main thing.
>
> yes - "Auto" did it - looks like "SysMouse" as config entry in the
> XF86Config is broken - anyone here from the XFree86 devel people
> to take a look at this ?
$ grep -5 -in sys
> options SHMMAXPGS=4096
> options SHMALL=16384
> options SHMSEG=16
> options SEMMNI=32
> options SEMMNS=128
Tried those, same error :(
_XF86BigfontQueryFont: could not attach shm segment
Cliff Rowley
- while (!asleep) { code(); }
To Unsubscribe: send
Cliff Rowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings, I'm just wondering if anyone has encountered the following, and
> what solutions you may have come up with / ideas you may have.
> This may not be a FreeBSD problem, since I am using the latest XFree86
> pre-4.0 snapshot.
> First:
> Almost ev
Donn Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Graichen wrote:
>>
>> one other thing: does anyone have the XFree86 pre 4.0 snapshot running
>> with moused and SysMouse ? - it works fine for me without moused and the
>> moues directly under X - but with moused and "SysMouse" "/dev/sysmouse"
>> not
Your message dated: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 23:49:07 EST
>> Will Andrews wrote:
>One compatability problem would seem to be lack of support for the
>Number Nine I128 board, previously supported in 3.3.*.
Me too! :-)
> This is very
>disappointing, as I've got to use that board to drive my SGI
>1600
No problems here...
* Nawfal M. Rouyan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000229 20:44]:
> Same thing happened to me... :(
>
> > one other thing: does anyone have the XFree86 pre
> > 4.0 snapshot running
> > with moused and SysMouse ? - it works fine for me
> > without moused and the
> > moues directly under X
On 29 Feb, Donn Miller wrote:
> What was the previous default value of SHMMAXPGS? Why was it
> changed? (Just curious, not slamming anybody...)
1024.
I'm using 8k right now and I didn't encounter an error from imlib
anymore (depends on what's used/screen resolution/resolution of pictures
load
Same thing happened to me... :(
> one other thing: does anyone have the XFree86 pre
> 4.0 snapshot running
> with moused and SysMouse ? - it works fine for me
> without moused and the
> moues directly under X - but with moused and
> "SysMouse" "/dev/sysmouse"
> nothing happens when moving the mou
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 05:56:08PM +, Thomas Graichen wrote:
> one other thing: does anyone have the XFree86 pre 4.0 snapshot running
> with moused and SysMouse ? - it works fine for me without moused and the
> moues directly under X - but with moused and "SysMouse" "/dev/sysmouse"
> nothing h
Thomas Graichen wrote:
>
> one other thing: does anyone have the XFree86 pre 4.0 snapshot running
> with moused and SysMouse ? - it works fine for me without moused and the
> moues directly under X - but with moused and "SysMouse" "/dev/sysmouse"
> nothing happens when moving the mouse - any furth
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28 Feb, Cliff Rowley wrote:
>> to site.def... Since posting my last mail, I've also encountered a
>> similar message, thie time reported by Imlib. It's not the exact same
>> message, but it's the same meaning. They are both having trouble get
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
> On 28 Feb, Cliff Rowley wrote:
>
> > to site.def... Since posting my last mail, I've also encountered a
> > similar message, thie time reported by Imlib. It's not the exact same
> > message, but it's the same meaning. They are both having trouble getting
> > a h
On 28 Feb, Cliff Rowley wrote:
> to site.def... Since posting my last mail, I've also encountered a
> similar message, thie time reported by Imlib. It's not the exact same
> message, but it's the same meaning. They are both having trouble getting
> a handle on shared memory (at least, this is
I have a similar situation:
On one of my stations:
- xdm works
- kdm does now.
On the other, both work.
Running 'FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #2: Thu Feb 24 15:08:07 CST 2000' on both
boxes, reinstalled XFree and KDE from ports last week.
The only difference I can find: one system runs XFree_S3V, the br
> I've got the same problem also, and can confirm it is a
> -current/XFree86-3.9.18 problem. (Probabably mainly an XFree86
> problem, I presume.) Apparently, the XFree86 build process isn't
> perfect either, since certain options in xc/config/cf/host.def can
> cause the "make install" to fail.
> > Thanks for pointing. What is your opinion about it (stability, compatability,
> > performance etc)?
>
> Haven't had time to screw with it any more than just a basic twm setup. I'd
> have to reinstall most of my X apps to use it (and I already have a nice
> 3.3.6 setup right now).
>
> I made
> Do you have any plans to make XFree86-devel port of it? This let us to test
> it and refine before XF-4.0 will be released.
I had no plans, personally, but then I'm not a ports
maintainer. Compiling the snapshot is pretty simple anyway.
Cliff Rowley
- while (!asleep) { code(); }
To Unsubs
Cliff Rowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Second:
> Using KDM in place of XDM, XFree86 just dies immediately, resulting in
> several attempts at launching, and then a 30 second pause. XFree86 works
> perfectly otherwise.
i see the same problem here (with an kde build outside of the ports
but w
> Will Andrews wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 10:42:22PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > Do you have any plans to make XFree86-devel port of it? This let us to test
> > > it and refine before XF-4.0 will be released.
> >
> > I already made one. However, since XFree86 4.0's release is impe
Will Andrews wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 10:42:22PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Do you have any plans to make XFree86-devel port of it? This let us to test
> > it and refine before XF-4.0 will be released.
>
> I already made one. However, since XFree86 4.0's release is impending
> within
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 11:11:27PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Thanks for pointing. What is your opinion about it (stability, compatability,
> performance etc)?
Haven't had time to screw with it any more than just a basic twm setup. I'd
have to reinstall most of my X apps to use it (and I alrea
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 10:42:22PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Do you have any plans to make XFree86-devel port of it? This let us to test
> it and refine before XF-4.0 will be released.
I already made one. However, since XFree86 4.0's release is impending
within the next three or four weeks (a
Donn Miller wrote:
> Cliff Rowley wrote:
>
> > This may not be a FreeBSD problem, since I am using the latest XFree86
> > pre-4.0 snapshot.
>
> > "XFree86-BigFont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24"
>
> I've got the same problem also, and can confirm it is a
> -current/XFree86-3.9
Cliff Rowley wrote:
> This may not be a FreeBSD problem, since I am using the latest XFree86
> pre-4.0 snapshot.
> "XFree86-BigFont extension: shmat() failed, size = 4096, errno = 24"
I've got the same problem also, and can confirm it is a
-current/XFree86-3.9.18 problem. (Probabably mainly an
Greetings, I'm just wondering if anyone has encountered the following, and
what solutions you may have come up with / ideas you may have.
This may not be a FreeBSD problem, since I am using the latest XFree86
pre-4.0 snapshot.
First:
Almost every time I load a page in Netscape (latest port), I
29 matches
Mail list logo
