On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote:
> Let me first ask ... do you use the "suspend/resume" option??
Yep.
> This caused the same "lockup" every few seconds on my machine too -
> a much slower 400 PII. As soon as I "shutdown" Win9X and rebooted
> it worked fine.
> Greg Lehey wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, I was never happy with the removal of block devices either. I
> > was shouted down with "can you point to any one use they are?", to
> > which I replied "just because I don't know of one doesn't mean there
> > isn't one, or that there will never be one in the fu
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> >
> > Doesn't Oracle run MUCH better when given raw block disk devices to store
> > data on?
>
> Oracle wants to cache it's own data, it doesn't want the buffer cache
> behind it.
Yes, now it's all coming back. It's amazing how much you can forget in
the space of a decad
Greg Lehey wrote:
>
> FWIW, I was never happy with the removal of block devices either. I
> was shouted down with "can you point to any one use they are?", to
> which I replied "just because I don't know of one doesn't mean there
> isn't one, or that there will never be one in the future". This
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:48:20AM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki - Stargate Industries, LLC
- NOC wrote:
> You're running vmware sucsessfully in --current?
Yes. -current from August 18th, and I'm running the vmware2-2.0.2.621 port.
Installing Win98 took about 4 hours though -- most of that was wh
T)
> From: Reinier Bezuidenhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Brian A. Seklecki - Stargate Industries, LLC - NOC"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: VMWare on -current, how fast should I expect it to be?
>
> Hi ..
>
> I d
You're running vmware sucsessfully in --current? I sync'd up the last
time I was in the office (last...Friday?) and the linux emulation package
refused to build in --current; complaining about an incopatible kernel
module. In fact, i had to comment out the linux proc file system (from
the linux
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 07:09:00AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > atapci0: port 0xfc90-0xfc9f at device 7.1 on
>pci0
> > ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
> > ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
> > ad0: 17301MB [35152/16/63] at ata0-master using UDMA33
> >
> > This is -current
On Tuesday, 12 September 2000 at 10:13:16 -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
>
> Julian Elischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>> Nik Clayton wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> For those of you running VMWare (2) on -current, how fast do you expect it to
>>> be?
>>>
>>> I'm running it quite successful
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:27:45PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
> For those of you running VMWare (2) on -current, how fast do you expect it to
> be?
I'm running it on my PIII 366 laptop. It's not great, but it's usable.
The biggest factors I've seen effecting performance are memory related.
Runnin
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:13:16 -0400 (EDT)
Thomas David Rivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Julian Elischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm confused...
'fraid so. It is raw devices (for discs) that linux doesn't have,
they are all block devices - although I may be out of date it's bee
I have seen this too ...
Let me first ask ... do you use the "suspend/resume" option??
If Yes then :)
This caused the same "lockup" every few seconds on my machine too -
a much slower 400 PII. As soon as I "shutdown" Win9X and rebooted
it worked fine.
I guess it is something in VMware that s
Julian Elischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Nik Clayton wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > For those of you running VMWare (2) on -current, how fast do you expect it to
> > be?
> >
> > I'm running it quite successfully on a 750MHz PIII w/ 128MB RAM, and the
> > following disk controller / dis
Nik Clayton wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> For those of you running VMWare (2) on -current, how fast do you expect it to
> be?
>
> I'm running it quite successfully on a 750MHz PIII w/ 128MB RAM, and the
> following disk controller / disk
>
> atapci0: port 0xfc90-0xfc9f at device 7.1 on pci0
>
Hi guys,
For those of you running VMWare (2) on -current, how fast do you expect it to
be?
I'm running it quite successfully on a 750MHz PIII w/ 128MB RAM, and the
following disk controller / disk
atapci0: port 0xfc90-0xfc9f at device 7.1 on pci0
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
a
15 matches
Mail list logo
