Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-10 Thread John Kennedy
On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 05:51:32PM -0500, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Please see/test: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15732 .

  Looks like that has landed in current:

commit f552d7adebb13e24f65276a6c4822bffeeac3993
Merge: 13720136fbf a382e21194c
Author: Martin Matuska 
Date:   Wed Jan 10 09:07:45 2024 +0100

zfs: merge openzfs/zfs@a382e2119

Notable upstream pull request merges:
 #15693 a382e2119 Add Gotify notification support to ZED
-->  #15732 e78aca3b3 Fix livelist assertions for dedup and cloning
 #15733 7ecaa0758 make zdb_decompress_block check decompression 
reliably
 #15735 255741fc9 Improve block sizes checks during cloning

Obtained from:  OpenZFS
OpenZFS commit: a382e21194c1690951d2eee8ebd98bc096f01c83



Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-04 Thread Alexander Motin

John,

On 04.01.2024 09:20, John Kennedy wrote:

On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 08:02:04PM -0800, John Kennedy wrote:

On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 05:51:32PM -0500, Alexander Motin wrote:

On 01.01.2024 08:59, John Kennedy wrote:

  ...
My poudriere build did eventually fail as well:
...
[05:40:24] [01] [00:17:20] Finished devel/gdb@py39 | gdb-13.2_1: Success
[05:40:24] Stopping 2 builders
panic: VERIFY(BP_GET_DEDUP(bp)) failed


Please see/test: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15732 .


   It came back today at the end of my poudriere build.  Your patch has fixed
it, so far at least.


   At the risk of conflating this with other ZFS issues, I beat on the VM a lot
more last night without triggering any panics.  My usual busy-workload is a
total kernel+world rebuild (with whatever pending patches might be out), then
a poudriere run (~230 or so packages).  It's weird that the first (much bigger)
run worked but later ones didn't (where maybe I had one port that failed to
build), triggering the panic.  Seemed repeatable, but don't have a feel for
the exact trigger like the sysctl issue.


What is the panic you see now?  It can not be the same, since the dedup 
assertion is no longer there.


--
Alexander Motin



Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-04 Thread John Kennedy
On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 08:02:04PM -0800, John Kennedy wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 05:51:32PM -0500, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > On 01.01.2024 08:59, John Kennedy wrote:
> > >  ...
> > >My poudriere build did eventually fail as well:
> > >   ...
> > >   [05:40:24] [01] [00:17:20] Finished devel/gdb@py39 | gdb-13.2_1: Success
> > >   [05:40:24] Stopping 2 builders
> > >   panic: VERIFY(BP_GET_DEDUP(bp)) failed
> > 
> > Please see/test: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15732 .
> 
>   It came back today at the end of my poudriere build.  Your patch has fixed
> it, so far at least.

  At the risk of conflating this with other ZFS issues, I beat on the VM a lot
more last night without triggering any panics.  My usual busy-workload is a
total kernel+world rebuild (with whatever pending patches might be out), then
a poudriere run (~230 or so packages).  It's weird that the first (much bigger)
run worked but later ones didn't (where maybe I had one port that failed to
build), triggering the panic.  Seemed repeatable, but don't have a feel for
the exact trigger like the sysctl issue.



Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-02 Thread John Kennedy
On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 05:51:32PM -0500, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 01.01.2024 08:59, John Kennedy wrote:
> >  ...
> >My poudriere build did eventually fail as well:
> > ...
> > [05:40:24] [01] [00:17:20] Finished devel/gdb@py39 | gdb-13.2_1: Success
> > [05:40:24] Stopping 2 builders
> > panic: VERIFY(BP_GET_DEDUP(bp)) failed
> 
> Please see/test: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15732 .

  It came back today at the end of my poudriere build.  Your patch has fixed
it, so far at least.




Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-02 Thread Alexander Motin

On 01.01.2024 08:59, John Kennedy wrote:

On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 06:43:58AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:

markj@ pointed me in
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276039
to
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15719

So it will probably be fixed sooner or later.

The other ZFS crashes I've seen are still an issue.


   My poudriere build did eventually fail as well:

...
[05:40:24] [01] [00:17:20] Finished devel/gdb@py39 | gdb-13.2_1: Success
[05:40:24] Stopping 2 builders
panic: VERIFY(BP_GET_DEDUP(bp)) failed


Please see/test: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15732 .

--
Alexander Motin



Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-02 Thread Alexander Leidinger

Am 2024-01-02 08:22, schrieb Kurt Jaeger:

Hi!


The sysctl for block cloning is vfs.zfs.bclone_enabled.
To check if a pool has made use of block cloning:
zpool get all poolname | grep bclone


One more thing:

I have two pools on that box, and one of them has some bclone files:

# zpool get all ref | grep bclone
ref   bcloneused 21.8M  -
ref   bclonesaved24.4M  -
ref   bcloneratio2.12x  -
# zpool get all pou | grep bclone
pou   bcloneused 0  -
pou   bclonesaved0  -
pou   bcloneratio1.00x  -

The ref pool contains the system and some files.
The pou pool is for poudriere only.

How do I find which files on ref are bcloned and how can I remove the
bcloning from them ?


No idea about the detection (I don't expect an easy way), but the answer 
to the second part is to copy the files after disabling block cloning. 
As this is system stuff, I would expect it is not much data, and you 
could copy everything and then move back to the original place. I would 
also assume original log files are not affected, and only files which 
were copied (installworld or installkernel or backup files or manual 
copies or port install (not sure about pkg install)) are possible 
targets.


Bye,
Alexander.

--
http://www.Leidinger.net alexan...@leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
http://www.FreeBSD.orgnetch...@freebsd.org  : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

> The sysctl for block cloning is vfs.zfs.bclone_enabled.
> To check if a pool has made use of block cloning:
> zpool get all poolname | grep bclone

One more thing:

I have two pools on that box, and one of them has some bclone files:

# zpool get all ref | grep bclone
ref   bcloneused 21.8M  -
ref   bclonesaved24.4M  -
ref   bcloneratio2.12x  -
# zpool get all pou | grep bclone
pou   bcloneused 0  -
pou   bclonesaved0  -
pou   bcloneratio1.00x  -

The ref pool contains the system and some files.
The pou pool is for poudriere only.

How do I find which files on ref are bcloned and how can I remove the
bcloning from them ?

-- 
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372  Now what ?



Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-01 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

> Am 2023-12-31 19:34, schrieb Kurt Jaeger:
> > I already have
> > 
> > vfs.zfs.dmu_offset_next_sync=0
> > 
> > which is supposed to disable block-cloning.
> 
> It isn't. This one is supposed to fix an issue which is unrelated to block
> cloning (but can be amplified by block cloning). This issue is fixed since
> some weeks, your Dec 23 build should not need it (when the issues happens,
> you have files with zero as parts of the data instead of the real data,
> and only if you copy files at the same time as those files are modified,
> and then only if you happen to get the timing right).
> 
> The sysctl for block cloning is vfs.zfs.bclone_enabled.
> To check if a pool has made use of block cloning:
> zpool get all poolname | grep bclone

Thanks. I now used that sysctl and my testcase (testbuild of shells/bash)
and it did not crash.

-- 
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372  Now what ?



Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-01 Thread Alexander Leidinger

Am 2023-12-31 19:34, schrieb Kurt Jaeger:

I already have

vfs.zfs.dmu_offset_next_sync=0

which is supposed to disable block-cloning.


It isn't. This one is supposed to fix an issue which is unrelated to 
block cloning (but can be amplified by block cloning). This issue is 
fixed since some weeks, your Dec 23 build should not need it (when the 
issues happens, you have files with zero as parts of the data instead of 
the real data, and only if you copy files at the same time as those 
files are modified, and then only if you happen to get the timing 
right).


The sysctl for block cloning is vfs.zfs.bclone_enabled.
To check if a pool has made use of block cloning:
zpool get all poolname | grep bclone

Bye,
Alexander.

--
http://www.Leidinger.net alexan...@leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
http://www.FreeBSD.orgnetch...@freebsd.org  : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-01 Thread John Kennedy
On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 02:27:17PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 06:43:58AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> > > markj@ pointed me in
> > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276039
> > > to
> > > https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15719 
> > > 
> > > So it will probably be fixed sooner or later.
> > > 
> > > The other ZFS crashes I've seen are still an issue.
> > 
> >   My poudriere build did eventually fail as well:
> > ...
> > [05:40:24] [01] [00:17:20] Finished devel/gdb@py39 | gdb-13.2_1: Success
> > [05:40:24] Stopping 2 builders
> > panic: VERIFY(BP_GET_DEDUP(bp)) failed
> 
> That's one of the panic messages I had as well.
> 
> See
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276051
> 
> for additional crashes and dumps.
> 
> >   I didn't tweak this system off defaults for block-cloning.  I haven't 
> > been following
> > that issue 100%.
> 
> Do you have
>   vfs.zfs.dmu_offset_next_sync=0
> ?

  I reverted everything and reinstalled.  The VERIFY(BP_GET_DEDUP(bp)) panic
hasn't reoccurred (tended to happen on poudriere-build cleanup), which may
lean it more towards corruption, or maybe I just haven't been "lucky" with my
small random chance of corruption.

  I did set vfs.zfs.dmu_offset_next_sync=0 after the bsdinstall was complete
(maybe I could have loaded the zfs kernel module from the shell and set it
before things kicked off).




Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-01 Thread John Kennedy
On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 08:42:26AM -0800, John Kennedy wrote:
>   Applying the two ZFS kernel patches fixes that issue:

commit 09af4bf2c987f6f57804162cef8aeee05575ad1d (zfs: Fix SPA sysctl handlers) 
landed too.

root@bsd15:~ # sysctl -a | grep vfs.zfs.zio
vfs.zfs.zio.deadman_log_all: 0
vfs.zfs.zio.dva_throttle_enabled: 1
vfs.zfs.zio.requeue_io_start_cut_in_line: 1
vfs.zfs.zio.slow_io_ms: 3
vfs.zfs.zio.taskq_wr_iss_ncpus: 0
vfs.zfs.zio.taskq_write: sync fixed,1,5 scale fixed,1,5
vfs.zfs.zio.taskq_read: fixed,1,8 null scale null
vfs.zfs.zio.taskq_batch_tpq: 0
vfs.zfs.zio.taskq_batch_pct: 80
vfs.zfs.zio.exclude_metadata: 0

root@bsd15:~ # uname -aUK
FreeBSD bsd15 15.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #1 
main-n267336-09af4bf2c98: Mon Jan  1 12:04:15 PST 2024 
warlock@bsd15:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC amd64 158 158




Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-01 Thread John Kennedy
On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 06:43:58AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> > >   I can crash mine with "sysctl -a" as well.
> 
> markj@ pointed me in
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276039
> to
> https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15719 
> 
> So it will probably be fixed sooner or later.
> 
> The other ZFS crashes I've seen are still an issue.

  Applying the two ZFS kernel patches fixes that issue:

root@bsd15:~ # sysctl -a | grep vfs.zfs.zio
vfs.zfs.zio.deadman_log_all: 0
vfs.zfs.zio.dva_throttle_enabled: 1
vfs.zfs.zio.requeue_io_start_cut_in_line: 1
vfs.zfs.zio.slow_io_ms: 3
vfs.zfs.zio.taskq_wr_iss_ncpus: 0
vfs.zfs.zio.taskq_write: sync fixed,1,5 scale fixed,1,5
vfs.zfs.zio.taskq_read: fixed,1,8 null scale null
vfs.zfs.zio.taskq_batch_tpq: 0
vfs.zfs.zio.taskq_batch_pct: 80
vfs.zfs.zio.exclude_metadata: 0

root@bsd15:~ # uname -aUK
FreeBSD bsd15 15.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #2 
main-n267335-499e84e16f5-dirty: Mon Jan  1 08:04:59 PST 2024 
warlock@bsd15:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC amd64 158 158




Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-01 Thread John Kennedy
On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 02:27:17PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Do you have
>vfs.zfs.dmu_offset_next_sync=0

  I didn't initially, I do now.  Like I said, I haven't been following that one
100%.  I know it isn't block-clone per say, so much as some underlying problem
it pokes with a pointy stick.  Small chance multiplied by a bunch of ZFS IOPS.

  Seems like I'd have to revert it all the way back to fresh install if I want
to get rid of all potential corruption unrelated to sysctl panic.

  But I'll do myh busy-work cycle (*) with that one and maybe another with it
off and see what happens.


  * full kernel+world, plus my local poudriere package build, currenly wedged
a bit with the heimdall build issue.



Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-01 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

> On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 06:43:58AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> > markj@ pointed me in
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276039
> > to
> > https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15719 
> > 
> > So it will probably be fixed sooner or later.
> > 
> > The other ZFS crashes I've seen are still an issue.
> 
>   My poudriere build did eventually fail as well:
>   ...
>   [05:40:24] [01] [00:17:20] Finished devel/gdb@py39 | gdb-13.2_1: Success
>   [05:40:24] Stopping 2 builders
>   panic: VERIFY(BP_GET_DEDUP(bp)) failed

That's one of the panic messages I had as well.

See

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276051

for additional crashes and dumps.

>   I didn't tweak this system off defaults for block-cloning.  I haven't been 
> following
> that issue 100%.

Do you have

vfs.zfs.dmu_offset_next_sync=0

?

-- 
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372  Now what ?



Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2024-01-01 Thread John Kennedy
On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 06:43:58AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> markj@ pointed me in
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276039
> to
> https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15719 
> 
> So it will probably be fixed sooner or later.
> 
> The other ZFS crashes I've seen are still an issue.

  My poudriere build did eventually fail as well:

...
[05:40:24] [01] [00:17:20] Finished devel/gdb@py39 | gdb-13.2_1: Success
[05:40:24] Stopping 2 builders
panic: VERIFY(BP_GET_DEDUP(bp)) failed

cpuid = 2
time = 1704091946
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 
0xfe00f62898c0
vpanic() at vpanic+0x131/frame 0xfe00f62899f0
spl_panic() at spl_panic+0x3a/frame 0xfe00f6289a50
dsl_livelist_iterate() at dsl_livelist_iterate+0x2de/frame 
0xfe00f6289b30
bpobj_iterate_blkptrs() at bpobj_iterate_blkptrs+0x235/frame 
0xfe00f6289bf0
bpobj_iterate_impl() at bpobj_iterate_impl+0x16e/frame 
0xfe00f6289c80
dsl_process_sub_livelist() at dsl_process_sub_livelist+0x5c/frame 
0xfe00f6289d00
spa_livelist_delete_cb() at spa_livelist_delete_cb+0xf6/frame 
0xfe00f6289ea0
zthr_procedure() at zthr_procedure+0xa5/frame 0xfe00f6289ef0
fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x82/frame 0xfe00f6289f30
fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfe00f6289f30
--- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0, rbp = 0 ---
KDB: enter: panic
[ thread pid 9 tid 100223 ]
Stopped at  kdb_enter+0x33: movq$0,0xe3a582(%rip)
db>

  Trying to do another poudriere build fails almost immediatly with that verify 
error.

  Your verify errors don't match up exactly.  I've got snapshots from before I 
started
freaking it out with the sysctl calls and possibly inducing corruption.

  I didn't tweak this system off defaults for block-cloning.  I haven't been 
following
that issue 100%.



Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2023-12-31 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

> >   I can crash mine with "sysctl -a" as well.

markj@ pointed me in
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276039
to
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15719 

So it will probably be fixed sooner or later.

The other ZFS crashes I've seen are still an issue.

-- 
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372  Now what ?



Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2023-12-31 Thread John Kennedy
>   I can crash mine with "sysctl -a" as well.

  Smaller test, this is sufficient to crash things:

root@bsd15:~ # sysctl vfs.zfs.zio
vfs.zfs.zio.deadman_log_all: 0
vfs.zfs.zio.dva_throttle_enabled: 1
vfs.zfs.ziopanic: sbuf_clear makes no sense on sbuf 0xf8002c8dc300 
with drain
cpuid = 3
time = 1704069514
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 
0xfe00fa502960
vpanic() at vpanic+0x131/frame 0xfe00fa502a90
panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfe00fa502af0
sbuf_clear() at sbuf_clear+0xa8/frame 0xfe00fa502b00
sbuf_cpy() at sbuf_cpy+0x56/frame 0xfe00fa502b20
spa_taskq_write_param() at spa_taskq_write_param+0x85/frame 
0xfe00fa502bd0
sysctl_root_handler_locked() at sysctl_root_handler_locked+0x9c/frame 
0xfe00fa502c20
sysctl_root() at sysctl_root+0x21e/frame 0xfe00fa502ca0
userland_sysctl() at userland_sysctl+0x184/frame 0xfe00fa502d50
sys___sysctl() at sys___sysctl+0x60/frame 0xfe00fa502e00
amd64_syscall() at amd64_syscall+0x153/frame 0xfe00fa502f30
fast_syscall_common() at fast_syscall_common+0xf8/frame 
0xfe00fa502f30
--- syscall (202, FreeBSD ELF64, __sysctl), rip = 0x3733c1e5619a, rsp = 
0x3733bf494538, rbp = 0x3733bf494570 ---
KDB: enter: panic
[ thread pid 780 tid 100237 ]
Stopped at  kdb_enter+0x33: movq$0,0xe3a582(%rip)
db> 



Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

2023-12-31 Thread John Kennedy
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Short overview:
> - Had CURRENT system from around September
> - Upgrade on the 23th of December
> - crashes in ZFS, see
>   https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
>   for details
> - Reinstalled from scratch with new SSDs drives from
> https://download.freebsd.org/snapshots/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/15.0/
> freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081900-memstick.img.xz
> - Had one crash with
>   sysctl -a
>   https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276039
> - Still see crashes with ZFS (and other) when using poudriere to
>   build ports.
> 
> Problem:
> 
> I happen to run in several cases of crashes in ZFS, some of
> them fatal (zpool non-recoverable).

  I can crash mine with "sysctl -a" as well.

  I seeded my bhyve with:
FreeBSD-15.0-CURRENT-amd64-20231228-fb03f7f8e30d-267242-disc1.iso

  Rebuilt the kernel (so now at main-n267320-4d08b569a01) and started
crunching through poudriere package builds.  Sorta stock install of encrypted
ZFS.  I didn't get it to crash with poudriere (yet).  Mine lives in bhyve,
so maybe less possible destruction via crashes.

KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 
0xfe00fa5f3960
vpanic() at vpanic+0x131/frame 0xfe00fa5f3a90
panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfe00fa5f3af0
sbuf_clear() at sbuf_clear+0xa8/frame 0xfe00fa5f3b00
sbuf_cpy() at sbuf_cpy+0x56/frame 0xfe00fa5f3b20
spa_taskq_write_param() at spa_taskq_write_param+0x85/frame 
0xfe00fa5f3bd0
sysctl_root_handler_locked() at sysctl_root_handler_locked+0x9c/frame 
0xfe00fa5f3c20
sysctl_root() at sysctl_root+0x21e/frame 0xfe00fa5f3ca0
userland_sysctl() at userland_sysctl+0x184/frame 0xfe00fa5f3d50
sys___sysctl() at sys___sysctl+0x60/frame 0xfe00fa5f3e00
amd64_syscall() at amd64_syscall+0x153/frame 0xfe00fa5f3f30
fast_syscall_common() at fast_syscall_common+0xf8/frame 
0xfe00fa5f3f30
--- syscall (202, FreeBSD ELF64, __sysctl), rip = 0x22e42167019a, rsp = 
0x22e41ee72518, rbp = 0x22e41ee72550 ---
KDB: enter: panic

  The sysctl died at this point, but who knows if it had pending buffered 
output or anything...

...
vfs.zfs.zio.deadman_log_all: 0
vfs.zfs.zio.dva_throttle_enabled: 1
vfs.zfs.zio.requeue_io_start_cut_in_line: 1
vfs.zfs.zio.slow_io_ms: 3
vfs.zfs.zio.taskq_wr_iss_ncpus: 0




ZFS problems since recently ?

2023-12-31 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

Short overview:
- Had CURRENT system from around September
- Upgrade on the 23th of December
- crashes in ZFS, see
  https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
  for details
- Reinstalled from scratch with new SSDs drives from
https://download.freebsd.org/snapshots/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/15.0/
freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081900-memstick.img.xz
- Had one crash with
  sysctl -a
  https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276039
- Still see crashes with ZFS (and other) when using poudriere to
  build ports.

Problem:

I happen to run in several cases of crashes in ZFS, some of
them fatal (zpool non-recoverable).

The latest was:

panic: VERIFY(BP_GET_DEDUP(bp)) failed

cpuid = 29
time = 1704050745
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfe02def538c0
vpanic() at vpanic+0x131/frame 0xfe02def539f0
spl_panic() at spl_panic+0x3a/frame 0xfe02def53a50
dsl_livelist_iterate() at dsl_livelist_iterate+0x2de/frame 0xfe02def53b30
bpobj_iterate_blkptrs() at bpobj_iterate_blkptrs+0x235/frame 0xfe02def53bf0
bpobj_iterate_impl() at bpobj_iterate_impl+0x16e/frame 0xfe02def53c80
dsl_process_sub_livelist() at dsl_process_sub_livelist+0x5c/frame 
0xfe02def53d00
spa_livelist_delete_cb() at spa_livelist_delete_cb+0xf6/frame 0xfe02def53ea0
zthr_procedure() at zthr_procedure+0xa5/frame 0xfe02def53ef0
fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x82/frame 0xfe02def53f30
fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfe02def53f30
--- trap 0x85baac33, rip = 0xdfda59b01bda59f, rsp = 0xaaca3ed7a68a3ed3, rbp = 
0x16f512f91ab512fd ---

before I had to nuke that pool and restart...

I already have

vfs.zfs.dmu_offset_next_sync=0

which is supposed to disable block-cloning.

Does anyone else see this with recent versions or is it just me ?

-- 
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372  Now what ?