On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
I have an asr based RAID controller (Adaptec 2400A), though it is an IDE
RAID controller, it uses the SCSI asr driver. My controller has
worked very well with FreeBSD 5.x, and the server is currently running
5.1-BETA. The only thing that doesn't
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:31:49PM +0300, Petri Helenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FreeBSD 5.x series is slowly progressing, but is nowhere near to
production quality. As the things are currently, you simply waste
your time.
This is only my opinion and I don't want to offend anyone.
catch it.
Pete
- Original Message -
From: Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Petri Helenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tim Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: raidframe
Petri Helenius wrote:
RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current
11:20 PM
Subject: Re: raidframe
Petri Helenius wrote:
RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be
unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation. Hopefully it
will be fixed before 5.2.
Makes one wonder how broken code ever got
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 08:09:17 +0300, Vallo Kallaste [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
FreeBSD 5.x series is slowly progressing, but is nowhere near to
production quality. As the things are currently, you simply waste
your time.
I'm running an old 5.1-current and a more recent 5.1-beta of about a
week ago
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 02:51:07PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind
of hardware?
RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be
unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation
: DAC1164PVX, 3 channels, firmware 5.08-0-87, 64MB RAM
mlxd0: Mylex System Drive on mlx0
mlxd0: 105009MB (215058432 sectors) RAID 5 (online)
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 02:51:07PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind
of hardware?
Same
RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be
unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation. Hopefully it
will be fixed before 5.2.
Makes one wonder how broken code ever got into the tree in the first place...
Pete
Petri Helenius wrote:
RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be
unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation. Hopefully it
will be fixed before 5.2.
Makes one wonder how broken code ever got into the tree in the first place...
Pete
Just
-
From: Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Petri Helenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tim Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: raidframe
Petri Helenius wrote:
RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would
If you rewind to last October, RAIDFrame worked well. Unfortunately,
some kernel interfaces changed in between now and then and RAIDFrame was
left behind. I am remis in not fixing it, but please understand that I
also have quite a few other responsibilities, and I get paid $0 to work
On 2003.06.02 11:18:34 +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
So far I´ve tried asr and aac, both cards end up in kernel panics and/or array
hang in a few minutes (multiple hardware platforms so I don´t think the motherboard
is to blame)
I have an asr based RAID controller (Adaptec 2400A), though it is
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 11:36:18AM +0300, Petri Helenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
left behind. I am remis in not fixing it, but please understand
that I also have quite a few other responsibilities, and I get
paid $0 to work on RAIDframe.
Not being a native english speaker I probably
FreeBSD 5.x series is slowly progressing, but is nowhere near to
production quality. As the things are currently, you simply waste
your time.
This is only my opinion and I don't want to offend anyone.
IMO, software does not magically get better but it must be actively
being used and
Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind
of hardware?
Same question goes for any recent SCSI RAID controllers supported
by FreeBSD.
I admit not having tried all combinations but it seems that using anything
else than simple ahc scsi stuff results in kernel panic
I'm using a Ami MegaRaid 1500 in 5.x without any issues.
-m
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Petri Helenius wrote:
Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind
of hardware?
Same question goes for any recent SCSI RAID controllers supported
by FreeBSD.
I admit
hi:
I figured since raidframe was in FreeBSD, it would be a good chance to
try it. I've already used vinum and ccd. I run it in Vmware. I
remember seeing that raidframe is still work in progress. Maybe
something is wrong with my setup. Or maybe it's broken ATM and I
should give it a shot later
! Aborting I/O operation.
Multiple disks failed in a single group! Aborting I/O operation.
[Failed to create a DAG]
panic: raidframe error at line 459 file
/usr/src/sys/dev/raidframe/rf_states.c
cpuid = 0; lapic.id =
boot() called on cpu#0
syncing disks, buffers remaining... panic: bdwrite
Hi, everybody,
I could not create the device name based on DEVFS.
I use devfs rule apply path raidctl unhide command, but in /dev/,
there is nothing about 'raidctl'. So I could not RAIDFrame.
Another, I can use the 'disklabel -e da2s2' command, but I could not
modify it.
I need your help
started getting a bunch of errors like this:
RAIDframe should be considered highly experimental. While it was
tested extensively under SMP in FreeBSD 4.x, it received very
little testing under SMP in -current. If you have more details
on this failure, I'd appreciate it.
Scott
---
Nov 16 00:04
, running a slightly modified GENERIC (added
SMP, raidframe and pcm), with INVARIANTS and WITNESS enabled (tried
without them too, no success).
So, any known issues with RAIDframe? I can supply more detailed info if
needed.
Cheers,
--
Miguel Mendez - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Public Key
21 matches
Mail list logo
