On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 16:07 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> [ ... reviving cvs rm'ed files ... ]
>
> As you've just shown, this can be a real PITA.
>
> > But I feel that David wants to know this, too.
>
> Huh? Do what?? I fully understand how to remove, add, and
> revive files in the repo.
On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:16 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote:
>> >
>> > Up to now I always thought "the Attic" is something CVS
>> > itself takes care of when "cvs rm"ing files. What's that
>> > special thing needing manu
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 10:32:11PM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> Backing out an rm'ed file should be as difficult as doing the sequence
> I just tested to make sure:
>
> F=toberemoved.txt
Coming up with the "F" list can be more than just ``ls -R
/home/ncvs/src/contrib/global'' as older versio
Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:16 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> > >
> > > Up to now I always thought "the Attic" is something CVS
> > > itself takes care of when "cvs rm"ing files. What's that
> > > special thing needing manual inter
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:16 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> >
> > Up to now I always thought "the Attic" is something CVS
> > itself takes care of when "cvs rm"ing files. What's that
> > special thing needing manual intervention or special
> > attention you
On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>>
>> I didn't put it in the Attic when I disconnected it from the
>> build in case someone came forward screaming about removing it.
>> I figured it was much easier to back out a Makefile commit than
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> I didn't put it in the Attic when I disconnected it from the
> build in case someone came forward screaming about removing it.
> I figured it was much easier to back out a Makefile commit than
> get things from the Attic back to being
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:01:59AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> In revision 1.148 of src/usr.bin/Makefile, the hook for building
> global was removed. This was 3.5 month ago. Is it time to move
> src/contrib/global and src/usr.bin/global into the attic?
Wow, that is still there. I forgot about
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In revision 1.148 of src/usr.bin/Makefile, the hook for building
> global was removed. This was 3.5 month ago. Is it time to move
> src/contrib/global and src/usr.bin/global into the attic?
Yes, it should have been done a
In revision 1.148 of src/usr.bin/Makefile, the hook for building
global was removed. This was 3.5 month ago. Is it time to move
src/contrib/global and src/usr.bin/global into the attic?
--
Steve
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
10 matches
Mail list logo
