Re: sendmail: no local mailer

2003-04-03 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-04-03 22:05, "Oleg V. Nauman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 03:18:18PM -0700, Nate Williams wrote: This happened on one of my -stable boxes lately when doing a upgrade using buildworld. For some (unknown) reason m4 bombed out and created an empty .cf fi

Re: sendmail: no local mailer

2003-04-03 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 03:18:18PM -0700, Nate Williams wrote: > > > > evantd> Sendmail has not been working on my system for some time now. I > > > > evantd> can't say exactly how long, but my guess is that it broke when I > > > > evantd> upgraded to RELENG_5_0. This is how sendmail is invoked (by

Re: sendmail: no local mailer

2003-04-02 Thread Evan Dower
rt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Evan Dower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: sendmail: no local mailer Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 13:59:28 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.188]) by mc10-f32.bay6.hotmail.com with Microsoft

Re: sendmail: no local mailer

2003-04-02 Thread John Baldwin
On 02-Apr-2003 Terry Lambert wrote: > Note: This should have been posted to -questions, not -current. Please read the other replies before sending your own. His sendmail.cf was empty and the problem was quickly diagnosed and fixed a while ago. -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://

Re: sendmail: no local mailer

2003-04-02 Thread Nate Williams
> > > evantd> Sendmail has not been working on my system for some time now. I > > > evantd> can't say exactly how long, but my guess is that it broke when I > > > evantd> upgraded to RELENG_5_0. This is how sendmail is invoked (by > > > evantd> default) and it's output. > > > > > > evantd> # sendm

Re: sendmail: no local mailer

2003-04-02 Thread Terry Lambert
Note: This should have been posted to -questions, not -current. Evan Dower wrote: > Sendmail has not been working on my system for some time now. I can't say > exactly how long, but my guess is that it broke when I upgraded to > RELENG_5_0. This is how sendmail is invoked (by default) and it's ou

Re: sendmail: no local mailer

2003-04-02 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:26:03AM -0700, Nate Williams wrote: > > evantd> Sendmail has not been working on my system for some time now. I > > evantd> can't say exactly how long, but my guess is that it broke when I > > evantd> upgraded to RELENG_5_0. This is how sendmail is invoked (by > > evantd>

Re: sendmail: no local mailer

2003-04-02 Thread Nate Williams
> evantd> Sendmail has not been working on my system for some time now. I > evantd> can't say exactly how long, but my guess is that it broke when I > evantd> upgraded to RELENG_5_0. This is how sendmail is invoked (by > evantd> default) and it's output. > > evantd> # sendmail -L sm-mta -bd -q30m

Re: sendmail: no local mailer

2003-04-02 Thread Evan Dower
TECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: sendmail: no local mailer Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:37:13 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net ([64.105.95.154]) by mc4-f22.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:37:14 -0800 Received: fr

Re: sendmail: no local mailer

2003-04-02 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
evantd> Sendmail has not been working on my system for some time now. I evantd> can't say exactly how long, but my guess is that it broke when I evantd> upgraded to RELENG_5_0. This is how sendmail is invoked (by evantd> default) and it's output. evantd> # sendmail -L sm-mta -bd -q30m -ODaemonPort

sendmail: no local mailer

2003-04-02 Thread Evan Dower
Sendmail has not been working on my system for some time now. I can't say exactly how long, but my guess is that it broke when I upgraded to RELENG_5_0. This is how sendmail is invoked (by default) and it's output. # sendmail -L sm-mta -bd -q30m -ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=localhost 451 4.0.0 No local