Tentitive fix for vn device

1999-01-30 Thread Matthew Dillon
This is a tentitive fix for the vn device problems reported earlier. It has not been well tested. Basically, the vn device tries to do something different for B_PAGING bp's to get around potential low-memory deadlocks. Previously this only applied to paging/swapping, and the

Re: Reading a text file with BTX

1999-01-30 Thread Robert Nordier
Daniel C. Sobral wrote: Robert Nordier wrote: The boot manager menu, for example F1 FreeBSD F2 UNIX F5 Drive 1 Default: F1 Y'know, in my computer that F5 is Drive 0, and the system will not boot unless I select it first. Selecting it, makes the OSes

Re: Ne2000 PCI Card

1999-01-30 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 10:33:20PM -0600, Bruce Albrecht br...@zuhause.mn.org wrote: performance at 10 Mbps, but it's a real dog at 100 Mbps. I'm only able to achieve 45-50 Mbps throughput with a dual P6-200 machine, and it uses nearly 30% of the CPU to do it. Hmm.. We tried the cards here

Re: Ne2000 PCI Card

1999-01-30 Thread Tim Preece
In message pine.bsf.4.05.9901281704550.81323-100...@bright.fx.genx.net , Alfred Perlstein bri...@hotjobs.com writes On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Rod Taylor wrote: I have 2 cheap 100mbit nics (rj45 only). Both use the ReaTek 8139 chipset (from the best that I can tell). Both are PCI. ...snip

Re: btokup().. patch to STYLE(9) (fwd)

1999-01-30 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 04:26:53PM +1100, John Birrell j...@cimlogic.com.au wrote: I can image a new subscriber to this list reading a few of these messages and thinking: why would I want to use an OS developed by these people?. We spend so much of our time looking up our own collective

Re: btokup().. patch to STYLE(9) (fwd)

1999-01-30 Thread Brian Feldman
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Greg Lehey wrote: On Friday, 29 January 1999 at 11:02:48 -0700, Warner Losh wrote: If I were working on this code written by someone else it'd leave my editor looking like the top example, that's for sure. I think that How easy is it to edit a piece of code and still

Re: Tentitive fix for vn device

1999-01-30 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: This is a tentitive fix for the vn device problems reported earlier. This fixes the problems I was having with vn devices - at least, I can once again cvsup on a vn device, which was guaranteed to fail instantly before. THanks! Kris - (ASP)

Even more interesting NFS problems..

1999-01-30 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Scenario: Two machines, releng3.freebsd.org (running 3.0-stable) and current.freebsd.org (running 4.0-current). releng3 has all the disk space and is the NFS server. current is an NFS client and uses releng3 for its CVS repository, FTP snapshot stashing area, etc. As of the day before

Re: Reading a text file with BTX

1999-01-30 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Robert Nordier wrote: Daniel C. Sobral wrote: Y'know, in my computer that F5 is Drive 0, and the system will not boot unless I select it first. Selecting it, makes the OSes boot and F5 disappear. Try the following patch. You can use the utility [...] Right on the mark. BTW, my BIOS

lkm not working

1999-01-30 Thread Daren Sefcik
I am now up to 4.0 and lkm is not working... rover# modstat modstat: /dev/lkm: Device not configured I have not used it much but I know it worked with my 3.0 system...any pointers would be great. thanks, Daren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current

Re: lkm not working

1999-01-30 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Daren Sefcik wrote: I am now up to 4.0 and lkm is not working... rover# modstat modstat: /dev/lkm: Device not configured I have not used it much but I know it worked with my 3.0 system...any pointers would be great. My guess: add option lkm to your kernel configuration file. -- Daniel

*1 routines in /sys/kern

1999-01-30 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 18:00:15 +1030 (CST), Mark Newton new...@atdot.dotat.org said: If I split sigaction(), sigsuspend(), sigpending(), sigprocmask() and sigaltstack() into front-end and back-end pieces a-la NetBSD so that emulator-specific signal semantics can be imposed without totally

Re: Reading a text file with BTX

1999-01-30 Thread Robert Nordier
Daniel C. Sobral wrote: Robert Nordier wrote: Daniel C. Sobral wrote: Y'know, in my computer that F5 is Drive 0, and the system will not boot unless I select it first. Selecting it, makes the OSes boot and F5 disappear. Try the following patch. You can use the utility

Re: lkm not working

1999-01-30 Thread Doug Rabson
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Daren Sefcik wrote: I am now up to 4.0 and lkm is not working... rover# modstat modstat: /dev/lkm: Device not configured I have not used it much but I know it worked with my 3.0 system...any pointers would be great. The lkm system has been superceded by a new kernel

Re: nuts'n'bolts in vfs_bio

1999-01-30 Thread Bjoern Fischer
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 01:23:05AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: [...] Please try this diff ( against RELENG_3 kern/vfs_bio.c ) and tell me if it works. This is for STABLE only. Current already has this patch. Hello Matthew, thank you for reviewing vfs_bio.c. Your patch seems

sigpending with pthreads - bug or feature?

1999-01-30 Thread Anton Berezin
I don't know whether I should file a bug report on this issue. Consider the following little program: /* t.c */ #include stdio.h #include signal.h int main( void) { sigset_t set; sigpending( set); return 0;

LINUX clone? sched_yield?

1999-01-30 Thread Paulo Fragoso
Hi, I'm trying to install StarOffice 5.0 in my FBSD-3.0-STABLE (26Jan1999). When setup is running the kernel reports: linux_clone(303): Not enabled Jan 30 15:05:39 foker /kernel: cmd setup.bin pid 303 tried to use non-present sched_yield Jan 30 15:05:53 foker last message repeated 892 times

Re: *1 routines in /sys/kern

1999-01-30 Thread Mike Smith
If I split sigaction(), sigsuspend(), sigpending(), sigprocmask() and sigaltstack() into front-end and back-end pieces a-la NetBSD so that emulator-specific signal semantics can be imposed without totally duplicating those routines inside the emulator (like I did with sendit() and recvit()

Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?

1999-01-30 Thread Brian Feldman
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Paulo Fragoso wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install StarOffice 5.0 in my FBSD-3.0-STABLE (26Jan1999). When setup is running the kernel reports: linux_clone(303): Not enabled Jan 30 15:05:39 foker /kernel: cmd setup.bin pid 303 tried to use non-present sched_yield Jan 30

Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?

1999-01-30 Thread Richard Seaman, Jr.
On Sat, Jan 30, 1999 at 03:33:26PM -0300, Paulo Fragoso wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install StarOffice 5.0 in my FBSD-3.0-STABLE (26Jan1999). When setup is running the kernel reports: linux_clone(303): Not enabled Jan 30 15:05:39 foker /kernel: cmd setup.bin pid 303 tried to use non-present

Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?

1999-01-30 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 13:54:36 -0500 (EST), Brian Feldman gr...@unixhelp.org said: sched_yield() is a stub that informs you nicely that it doesn't exist :) Use the options: options P1003_1B options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options _KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L Peter: is

Re: c_caddr_t

1999-01-30 Thread Nate Williams
Matt, get over it. bde didn't slam *YOU* in the commit messages. You were never mentioned personally. Also, taking your complaint to -current is not proper proceedure for handling grievances. While this is true, I think the overall point he made was reasonable considering how often

Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?

1999-01-30 Thread Peter Dufault
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 13:54:36 -0500 (EST), Brian Feldman gr...@unixhelp.org said: sched_yield() is a stub that informs you nicely that it doesn't exist :) Use the options: options P1003_1B options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options _KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L

[no subject]

1999-01-30 Thread andre
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: PPP (userland) troubles ?

1999-01-30 Thread Leif Neland
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Brian Somers wrote: Would it be possible to add an exponential delay when connecting fails for either reason? I just received my specified phone-bill. It filled 42 pages, with hundreds of calls with a duration of 17 seconds. (Because my modem needs to be

CAP port and non-IP multicast

1999-01-30 Thread Bill Paul
Somebody wrote me recently to tell me they were having trouble getting the Columbia Appletalk package to work with a PCI ethernet card. Looking through both the Columbia Appletalk code and the kernel, I think the problem is a general one not necessarily related to a given ethernet driver. I'm not

file: table is full ?

1999-01-30 Thread Mike Tancsa
I have a 3.0 STABLE box that under heavy smtp activity is getting Jan 29 21:37:05 ns3 /kernel: file: table is f Jan 29 21:37:05 ns3 /kernel: ull Jan 29 21:37:05 ns3 /kernel: file: table is full I have maxusers set to 128 ns3# sysctl -a | grep -i files kern.maxfiles: 4136 kern.maxfilesperproc:

Re: Why doesn't Vinum start automatically?

1999-01-30 Thread Greg Lehey
On Friday, 29 January 1999 at 22:41:52 -0800, Chris Knight wrote: There have been changes to rc and rc.conf lately to autostart Vinum. But on my system it does not auto load at start and I wind up manually loading the module, reading the config and mounting the volume. Any help if figuring

Re: Tentitive fix for vn device

1999-01-30 Thread John Polstra
In article pine.osf.4.05.9901302311150.18962-100...@bragg, Kris Kennaway kkenn...@physics.adelaide.edu.au wrote: This fixes the problems I was having with vn devices - at least, I can once again cvsup on a vn device, which was guaranteed to fail instantly before. That's my baby, the ultimate

Re: Even more interesting NFS problems..

1999-01-30 Thread John Polstra
In article 91639.917702...@zippy.cdrom.com, Jordan K. Hubbard j...@zippy.cdrom.com wrote: As of the day before yesterday, I started getting all manner of NFS errors on current and checked the amd.conf file it was using. Version 3 of NFS seemed to be the default (!) for amd so I changed it to

Re: file: table is full ?

1999-01-30 Thread N
Quoth Mike Tancsa: Jan 29 21:37:05 ns3 /kernel: file: table is full I have maxusers set to 128 ns3# sysctl -a | grep -i files kern.maxfiles: 4136 kern.maxfilesperproc: 4136 Try running `pstat -T' and see what number of file descriptors is generally in use. FYI, I've had to bump it up to

Re: Why doesn't Vinum start automatically?

1999-01-30 Thread Jake
In -CURRENT it is now: if [ X$skip_diskconf != XYES -a -n $vinum_slices ]; then vinum read $vinum_slices fi Has this been fixed in -stable? There was the problem of $vinum_slices not being initialized because it was being used before rc.conf had been sourced. Any ideas why

Re: Why doesn't Vinum start automatically?

1999-01-30 Thread Greg Lehey
On Saturday, 30 January 1999 at 16:03:48 -0800, Jake wrote: In -CURRENT it is now: if [ X$skip_diskconf != XYES -a -n $vinum_slices ]; then vinum read $vinum_slices fi Has this been fixed in -stable? No. There was the problem of $vinum_slices not being initialized because it was

Re: Why doesn't Vinum start automatically?

1999-01-30 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
I can't see any way that this could compromise the stability of -STABLE, so I agree. Peter committed the change to -CURRENT, so I'll leave it to him. I'd prefer it if you did it - Peter is probably too busy to even notice this request. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: Even more interesting NFS problems..

1999-01-30 Thread David O'Brien
errors on current and checked the amd.conf file it was using. Version 3 of NFS seemed to be the default (!) for amd Yes, to be consistent with the state of world WRT NFS. Or at least with the leader -- Solaris. This has been the default in 3.0-C since the am-utils import. it to version 2

Re: LINUX clone? sched_yield?

1999-01-30 Thread Bruce Evans
sched_yield() is a stub that informs you nicely that it doesn't exist :) Use the options: options P1003_1B options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options _KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L Peter: is there any harm in enabling these features permanently? There's a yield()

Re: Why doesn't Vinum start automatically?

1999-01-30 Thread Chris Knight
At 04:03 PM 1/30/99 -0800, you wrote: Any ideas why this isn't working? Is it working in -current but not -stable? This led me to believe that he was running -stable and simply posted to the wrong group. I am running -stable. I didn't 'exactly' post to the wrong group. I posted to

Re: Even more interesting NFS problems..

1999-01-30 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Yes, to be consistent with the state of world WRT NFS. Or at least with the leader -- Solaris. This has been the default in 3.0-C since the am-utils import. Yeah, well, amd is a whole other ball of wax. That's clearly broken in both 3.0-stable and 4.0-current and we're going to have to