I ran across a few problems after I remade world. The new scoped
address syntax breaks /etc/rc.network6. In particular, some lines that
look like:
Sorry not to announce it yet, but scoped addr format will
still change, like below.
addr%scope
I'll send another mail to describe it in
I remeber being a newbie and getting burned by the need to explicitly
turn a line 'off' in my /etc/ttys file instead of simply deleting it.
This fixes it using a trivial mark then collect sweep.
Can a couple people take a look? I'd like to get it into 4.0 because
it seems to follow POLA
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 10:39:42AM -0500, Bryan Liesner wrote:
Jose, the problem seems to be resolved by rebuilding the boot
loader. Or bypass the loader altogether.
cd /usr/src/sys/boot
make obj
make all install
and you'll be able to boot the kernel with the latest ata stuff.
Do
After installing and rebooting a machine takes a long time to get past
sendmail. Adding the hostname to /etc/hosts solves this, as we all
know.
Is it not possible to let sysinstall do this?
Or am I missing something somewhere?
--
Marc Schneiders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://zelf.net
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000219 02:22] wrote:
I remeber being a newbie and getting burned by the need to explicitly
turn a line 'off' in my /etc/ttys file instead of simply deleting it.
This fixes it using a trivial mark then collect sweep.
Can a couple people take a look?
"Brian J. McGovern" wrote:
I don't know if I agree. "Custom" is exactly what it says... You can build
out the system with specifically the components you want. Now, perhaps I'm out
That proves "Custom" is not exactly what it says. You can do the same
thing with Novice. ALL installation modes
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Robert Watson wrote:
/usr/ports/security/openssh/work/ssh/lib/../rsa.h:22: openssl/rsa.h: No
such fil
e or directory
Yes, this is the same problem Jordan is seeing. I really don't know why,
because it SHOULD be failing gracefully when it sees you don't have an
It seems Bryan Liesner wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
Have you rebuild your modules lately ??
-Søren
Yes. My world is current as of a few hours ago. I did a make world
right after finding out about the loader problem to rule that
possibility out. The disk probes
So do I. Unfortunately our hands are tied - the version of FreeBSD
distributed in the US must not contain these because they are patented
technologies and not available for unrestricted use. Unfortunately this is
also the same version distributed worldwide on FreeBSD CDs, install
At this
On 20 Feb 00, at 6:56, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
"Guided". I like it. That's *PRECISELY* what this installation option
is. There is NO difference in the number of choices available in any of
the three types.
I have many times encountered a user who avoided the NOVICE install
and tried one of
In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Kai Großjohann wrote:
"Jordan K. Hubbard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I really kinda wish you'd point them to Novice^H^H^H^H^HStandard
instead since it does more than be a bit more verbose, it also makes
sure that all the
It already does this if you get your crypto from internat. US mirror sites
only carry the neutered (no-RSA) version, but internat carries RSA and
builds it conditional on USA_RESIDENT.
And why don't the USA sites have the RSAREF version? I'm still not
sure I understand the
I cvsupped this morning and I just had a chance to build a new kernel, and
now I get a "cannot mount root" and it drops into some kind of commandline
where I can enter a root for it to mount. This is the error it gives me
now:
ata0-slave: WARNING: WAIT_INTR active=ATA_WAIT_READY
ata0-slave:
Hi again,
After remaking the loader (unnecessary since it's still broken), I've
removed my KLDs from loader.conf (I was loading a splash screen) and it
now boots as Bryan noticed.
However it seems another problem showed up, and I'm not sure where the
problem is.
I have a Teles ISDN card on
Brian Beattie wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
"Guided". I like it. That's *PRECISELY* what this installation option
is. There is NO difference in the number of choices available in any of
the three types.
Guided/Express/Expert. That's my vote.
This still
Quoting from OpenBSD:
"We took a free license release of ssh and OpenBSD-ifyed it. We get around
the USA-based RSA patent by providing an easy way to automatically download
and install a RSA-enabled package containing shared library versions of
libcrypto and libssl. These packages are based on
The whole RSA scheme is bogus, because anyone in the world can get an
implementation of RSA, so its widely accesible, so why all this
RSAREF/non-RSAREF mumbo-jumbo?
Because US patent law is pretty dumb :)
--mike
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
The questions which aren't being answered here are "what use is OpenSSL
without RSA"
To ports, not much - with the exception of one or two, they all require
RSA.
Intrinsically, a lot. I have big plans for using openssl in the base
system, and if
At 09:50 PM 2/18/00 -0800, R Joseph Wright wrote:
I recently upgraded from 3.2 to 4.0. I use an ide hard disk, and would
like to know how to change over the devices. I created the new devices
by copying over /usr/src/etc/MAKEDEV to a new /dev directory and running
it, but it didn't create any
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Philipp Mergenthaler wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 10:39:42AM -0500, Bryan Liesner wrote:
Jose, the problem seems to be resolved by rebuilding the boot
loader. Or bypass the loader altogether.
cd /usr/src/sys/boot
make obj
make all install
and you'll be able to
Hi,
cdrecord, freshly built on last night's -current:
atlas# cdrecord -v dev=1,6,0 -inq
Cdrecord release 1.8a21 Copyright (C) 1995-1999 Jrg Schilling
TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM
scsidev: '1,6,0'
scsibus: 1 target: 6 lun: 0
atapi: 0
cdrecord: Warning: controller returns zero sized CD capabilities
Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 11:28:45PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Novice is ok, it's the other two that are problematic. Well,
particularly "custom". "Custom" does not scare away anyone, and is
actually actractive to Windows users. It should be called "death
It seems Bryan Liesner wrote:
Do you use KLMs?
Yes, I do! I was loading a screen saver with the boot loader. And
now I see I am wrong about rebuilding the loader! When I had success
loading the kernel directly, I moved loading the screensaver into
rc.conf instead. Then I thought that
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
Have you rebuild your modules lately ??
-Søren
Yes. My world is current as of a few hours ago. I did a make world
right after finding out about the loader problem to rule that
possibility out. The disk probes still fail when loading today's
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I remeber being a newbie and getting burned by the need to explicitly
turn a line 'off' in my /etc/ttys file instead of simply deleting it.
Here here.
Doug
--
"Welcome to the desert of the real."
- Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix"
To
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Victor Salaman wrote:
I personally think that it's braindead to add openssl to the system
and stripout parts of it (RSA IDEA). Don't get me wrong, I love to
have
So do I. Unfortunately our hands are tied - the version of FreeBSD
distributed in the US must not contain
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Kai Großjohann wrote:
"Jordan K. Hubbard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I really kinda wish you'd point them to Novice^H^H^H^H^HStandard
instead since it does more than be a bit more verbose, it also makes
sure that all the appropriate
openssl becomes a "distribution" like the DES bits are. Depending on
external packages is actually something I'm trying to wean sysinstall
away from because the dependency is a PITA and the creation of the
packages collection is not automated in the same way that distribution
building
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 19:28:23 +, Bob Bishop wrote:
Hi,
cdrecord, freshly built on last night's -current:
Freshly built? That's cdrecord 1.8a21, which is several versions old. I
think you should be using cdrecord 1.8 release from the ports tree.
atlas# cdrecord -v dev=1,6,0 -inq
At 10:31 PM -0800 2/19/00, Kris Kennaway wrote:
if 4.0 is delayed, I want it delayed for things which are actually busted,
and not to move features from the ports collection to the base system.
No-one's talking about delaying 4.0.
Not directly, but all the work trying to figure this out is
Thanks all! rm -rf on /usr/compat/linux did the trick. Now I can try to
install Oracle. :-)
Thanks again.
-Reggie
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 8:31 PM
To: Jordan K. Hubbard
Cc: Reginald S. Perry; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could you please create the patch which seems to be safely
committed? That will be very much help.
Well, I can try but I need to know most shortest and most trivial EPSV
check sequence from you since can't check it locally and don't know about EPSV.
EPSV is just enhanced version of
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 10:24:14PM -0500, Kelvin Farmer wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if its possible to run FreeBSD-4.0 on a 486 SLC2 66mhz.
I'm sure it is possible, see attached.
(win95 runs on this computer ok)
I downloaded the floppies from Feb.14th, and disabled the hardware I
don't
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Bryan Liesner wrote:
The latest ata commits left my system completely unbootable. No disks
were probed.
He, you always seem to be lucky when I change something :)
I always hold my breath when I cvsup and see changes to ata*:)
Hmm,
It seems Bryan Liesner wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Bryan Liesner wrote:
The latest ata commits left my system completely unbootable. No disks
were probed.
He, you always seem to be lucky when I change something :)
I always hold my breath when I
This message was sent from Geocrawler.com by "Victor Salaman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be sure to reply to that address.
I personally think that it's braindead to add
openssl to the system and stripout parts of it
(RSA IDEA). Don't get me wrong, I love to have
openssl inside the system, it's just
hi Soren,
The latest ata commits left me unbootable too, the patch you provided
below didn't help this too. I have a very different configuration from
Bryan's (much simpler too):
- DFI K6XV3+ mb with VIA MVP3 chipset
ata-pci0: VIA 82C586 ATA-33 controller port 0xe000-0xe00f at device 7.1
on
Hi,
Apart from the more recently broken ATA stuff I started getting the
following (cosmetic only really, but it leaves me wondering..) in kernels
compiled around the 12th this month. This machine really just has one pci
bus (this is a simple K6 VIA MVP3 motherboard). Also the unknow (to
It seems Jose Gabriel Marcelino wrote:
Well, rebuild the loader, that helped Bryan, apparently it has
nothing to do with the ata driver
The latest ata commits left me unbootable too, the patch you provided
below didn't help this too. I have a very different configuration from
Bryan's
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Jose Gabriel Marcelino wrote:
hi Soren,
The latest ata commits left me unbootable too, the patch you provided
below didn't help this too. I have a very different configuration from
Bryan's (much simpler too):
Jose, the problem seems to be resolved by rebuilding the boot
On -current my VGA card is being used as a CGA card. It is correctly
recognized as a VGA:
vga-pci0: S3 Trio graphics accelerator mem 0xf800-0xfbff irq 11 at device
15.0 on pci0
vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3d0-0x3db iomem 0xb8000-0xb on isa0
but then used as a CGA:
sc0: CGA 16
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
At this stage, I'm ready to have two different CD products for
international and domestic use. I can also ensure that the
appropriate ISO images are made available from the US and
internat.freebsd.org, along with the distribution bits. What we
Kai Großjohann wrote:
"Jordan K. Hubbard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I really kinda wish you'd point them to Novice^H^H^H^H^HStandard
instead since it does more than be a bit more verbose, it also makes
sure that all the appropriate steps are covered and prevents even
relatively
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Okay, so what do I need to do to make this happen?
1. Make openssl build as part of the standard "world" and depend
on the setting of USA_RESIDENT, which will be initially set by
sysinstall.
It already does this if you get your crypto
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
It already does this if you get your crypto from internat. US mirror sites
only carry the neutered (no-RSA) version, but internat carries RSA and
builds it conditional on USA_RESIDENT.
And why don't the USA sites have the RSAREF version?
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
I cvsupped this morning and I just had a chance to build a new kernel, and
now I get a "cannot mount root" and it drops into some kind of commandline
where I can enter a root for it to mount. This is the error it gives me
now:
ata0-slave:
Building with rsaref can't be the default case, because it's restrictively
licensed and not legal for some people to use.
It's trying to figure out who "some" people are and how to address the
needs of people who don't fit that category that I'm still having a
hard time with here. If I have
"Jeffrey J. Mountin" wrote:
At 10:36 AM 2/18/00 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
I will also say here and now that even I use the Standard installation
since I don't like having to remember all the canonical steps in setting
up a "stock" system and if anybody should remember them, it should
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Building with rsaref can't be the default case, because it's restrictively
licensed and not legal for some people to use.
It's trying to figure out who "some" people are and how to address the
needs of people who don't fit that category that
Anyone else got this error?
-- snip --
=== lib/libcom_err/doc
install-info --quiet --defsection="Programming development tools." --defentry="*
libcom_err: (com_err).A Common Error Description Library for UNIX."
com_err.info /usr/share/info/dir
install-info: unrecognized option
I found the problem Jordan and Robert Watson were having building ports that
require rsaref and openssl. The test for whether libcrypto was compiled with
RSA was using shell syntax for executing the command and not make's syntax.
The extra 'true' on the command is to silence make's warning about
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Jim Bloom wrote:
I found the problem Jordan and Robert Watson were having building ports that
require rsaref and openssl. The test for whether libcrypto was compiled with
RSA was using shell syntax for executing the command and not make's syntax.
The extra 'true' on the
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Victor Salaman wrote:
I personally think that it's braindead to add openssl to the system
and stripout parts of it (RSA IDEA). Don't get me wrong, I love to
have
Pardon me for coming late to the party, but what was the rationale
See the file src/UPDATING. This is one of a couple problems that one
sees when trying to install current on an older system. If this error
isn't mentioned explicitly, check the sections relating to flags and
xinstall (install).
Jim Bloom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Omachonu Ogali wrote:
Anyone else
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Victor Salaman wrote:
I personally think that it's braindead to add openssl to the system
and stripout parts of it (RSA IDEA). Don't get me wrong, I love to
have
Pardon me for coming late to the party, but what was the rationale
Having _a_ general-purpose cryptography toolkit in the base system allows
us to add in all sorts of cool things to FreeBSD (https support for fetch,
openssh, random cryptographic enhancements elsewhere). OpenSSL just
happens to be the only decent freely-available (BSDL) toolkit.
And I still
I'm back and resubscribed to a subset of lists
(hackers, announce and current)
My connectivity is still shitty, but I'm working on it
and have managed to Cvsup my cvs tree up-to-date.
Julian
--
++
| __--_|\ Julian Elischer |
| / \ [EMAIL
How does OpenBSD do it? Cant we do what they do?
On 20-Feb-00 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Victor Salaman wrote:
I personally think that it's braindead to add openssl to the system
and stripout parts of it (RSA IDEA). Don't get me wrong, I
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, William Woods wrote:
How does OpenBSD do it? Cant we do what they do?
They do a worse job than us is the short answer.
Kris
"How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?"
"Eight!"
"That was a rhetorical question!"
"Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer
Hey all,
I got this error, and the 2205 entry in UPDATING didn't seem to cover
enough for me, I was comming from a clean bin install of 3.2.
UPDATING - 2205 entry;
make buildworld
make installworld This will fail
cd
How does OpenBSD do it? Cant we do what they do?
1. They're in Canada
2. What they do appears to be kind of icky, e.g. it requires more
"hand work" than I think the average FreeBSD user would be willing
to accept (or the average developer would be willing to see in the
tree in such a
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Hmmm. I'm beginning to wonder if openssl shouldn't just be backed-out
at this point. The situation with RSA makes this far more problematic
than I think anyone first thought, and I've seen a lot of breakage so
far for what appears to be
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
Pardon me for coming late to the party, but what was the
rationale behind putting openssl into the source anyway? Given the
rsa/no rsa problems, not to mention the US vs. the world problems,
what were the benefits
I have a crazy idea, and don't flame me for it...
Don't remove OpenSSL from the three... put the whole thing there, the whole
openssl distro in the tree. The problem with the patent is not that you
CAN'T get the software, the problem is that you can't build with it and use
it. But nobody said
64 matches
Mail list logo
