Re: od driver for -CURRENT

2001-02-10 Thread non
From: Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 06:24:20 +1100 (EST) > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Hmm, can you demonstrate the problem? The write-protect check in the od > > > driver is one of the things that the

Compaq WL200

2001-02-10 Thread John Murphy
I'd like to use a Compaq WL200 PCI wireless LAN Card with FreeBSD soon. I've seen mention of the pcic driver in -current, but I'm runing -stable at present. Is the Compaq WL200 already supported by current? If not, is there work in progress? Thanks, John. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PR

Re: Current SMP Kernel panics

2001-02-10 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
-On [20010210 06:26], Manfred Antar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >APIC_IO: routing 8254 via 8259 and IOAPIC #0 intpin 0 >IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. >panic: mutex sched lock not owned at ../../kern/kern_synch.c:175 Me too. 166 static void 167 roundrobin

Re: od driver for -CURRENT

2001-02-10 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
>Are there any reason device drivers do not check if thier devices are >writable or not when they are opened ? I think returning an error >value, like `od', is the easiest way to avoid this problem. It is not necessarily sufficient since the media may be changed after open on certain types of dev

Cardbus, audio & irq sharing [Was: Kernel Panic from Yesterday's CVSup]

2001-02-10 Thread Andrea Campi
> : And, it's not working for me, i.e. my pccard using cardbus is working on irq > : 11, my csa audio card is probed and configured on irq 11, but audio playback > : is not. > > Audio and current is also dicy. Well, the same happened under -stable. I think this will be my last IBM laptop, I don'

Re: Current SMP Kernel panics

2001-02-10 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
-On [20010210 16:27], Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >#ifdef SMP > mtx_lock_spin(&sched_lock); > need_resched(); > forward_roundrobin(); > mtx_unlock_spin(&sched_lock); >#else This does not quite work. I don't get the

Re: Current SMP Kernel panics

2001-02-10 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010210 08:24] wrote: > -On [20010210 16:27], Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >#ifdef SMP > > mtx_lock_spin(&sched_lock); > > need_resched(); > > forward_roundrobin(); > >

Re: Current SMP Kernel panics

2001-02-10 Thread Manfred Antar
At 04:20 PM 2/10/2001 +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: >-On [20010210 06:26], Manfred Antar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>APIC_IO: routing 8254 via 8259 and IOAPIC #0 intpin 0 >>IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. >>panic: mutex sched lock not owned at ..

Re: Current SMP Kernel panics

2001-02-10 Thread Jake Burkholder
> > Should it become: > > #ifdef SMP > mtx_lock_spin(&sched_lock); > need_resched(); > forward_roundrobin(); > mtx_unlock_spin(&sched_lock); > #else > > ? > > I cannot test it yet, need to reanimate my testbox first. You need to handle the UP case as well :) Also, I

Re: Current SMP Kernel panics

2001-02-10 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
-On [20010210 18:08], Alfred Perlstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >* Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010210 08:24] wrote: >> >> Perhaps only need_resched() needs to be spinlocked. I am not sure, I am >> not a SMP guru. > >That looks correct, need_res

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_synch.c

2001-02-10 Thread Jake Burkholder
> jake2001/02/10 11:07:32 PST > > Modified files: > sys/kern kern_synch.c > Log: > Acquire sched_lock around need_resched() in roundrobin() to satisfy > assertions that it is held. Since roundrobin() is a timeout there's > no possible way that it could be calle

Re: Current SMP Kernel panics

2001-02-10 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
-On [20010210 17:30], Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >Perhaps only need_resched() needs to be spinlocked. I am not sure, I am >not a SMP guru. To add: It needed to be spinlocked as you saw jake's commit affirmed and fixed. However I am currently hanging just aft

Re: od driver for -CURRENT

2001-02-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >Are there any reason device drivers do not check if thier devices are > >writable or not when they are opened ? I think returning an error > >value, like `od', is the easiest way to avoid this problem. > > It is not necessarily sufficient since the

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha trap.c src/sys/i386/i386 trap.c

2001-02-10 Thread Jake Burkholder
> jake2001/02/10 12:33:35 PST > > Modified files: > sys/alpha/alpha trap.c > sys/i386/i386trap.c > Log: > Clear the reschedule flag after finding it set in userret(). This > used to be in cpu_switch(), but I don't see any difference between > doing it her

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha trap.c src/sys/i386/i386 trap.c

2001-02-10 Thread Andrea Campi
> This fixes -current on my machines (i386 UP and SMP). Confirmed for UP i686. > Should be in the clear now. asmodia has seen a lock reversal between > the process lock and uidinfo lock, but I can't reproduce it. You > probably want to remove the kernel option WITNESS_DDB if you have it > it e

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha trap.c src/sys/i386/i386 trap.c

2001-02-10 Thread Andrea Campi
> > Clear the reschedule flag after finding it set in userret(). This > > used to be in cpu_switch(), but I don't see any difference between > > doing it here. > > Should be in the clear now. asmodia has seen a lock reversal between > the process lock and uidinfo lock, but I can't reprodu

Re: disklabel.c & disklabel.8 patch

2001-02-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John W. De Boskey wrote: >I've been using the disklabel.c patch which allows easier > configuration by being able to specify a new disklabel of > the form: > > #size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > a: 400M04.2BSD 4096 1638475

Re: disklabel.c & disklabel.8 patch

2001-02-10 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bruce Evans writes: : These are not suitable for commit in their current form. The : disklabel.c patch has more than the usual density of style bugs. : It doesn't even use the normal brace style. You can find a mostly cleaned up version at http://people.fr

New OpenSSL snapshot for testing

2001-02-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
Well, I lost the previous OpenSSL snapshot with a hard disk crash (and it's no longer on the FTP site) so I had to redo it - please test this one instead: http://www.freebsd.org/~kris/openssl-0.9.6-stable-20010210.tbz Same deal as before - unpack it in /usr/src and rebuild. I'll comm

Is Sawfish running on -current?

2001-02-10 Thread Takeshi Ken Yamada
I have the following error while compiling Sawfish on recent -current. Is it my half updated fault or the -current issue? gmake[1]: Entering directory `/home/SRC/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/ports/x11-wm/sawfish/work/sawfish-0.36/lisp' SAWFISHLISPDIR=. SAWFISHEXECDIR=../src/.libexec SAWFISHDOCFI