About every other time I boot my IBM ThinkPad 600E I get this panic
(hand typed, as I don't have a second machine here to be able to use a
serial console).
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Fault virtual address = 0x28
Fault code = supervisor read, page
:
: I notice that this option is off by default. Can you give a general idea
:of when it should be enabled, when it should be disabled, and what bad
:things might result with it on?
:
:Thanks,
:
:Doug
There's no downside, really. The directory cache is so tiny without
it that you
join
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
"Justin T. Gibbs" wrote:
> > I notice that this option is off by default. Can you give a general
> >idea of when it should be enabled, when it should be disabled, and what bad
> >things might result with it on?
>
> It consumes a full page per-directory even though the majority of
> directori
There is a small typo in src/release/Makefile rev 1.161; not 'kernel',
but 'KERNEL' is correct.
-- -
Makoto `MAR' MATSUSHITA
--- Makefile.dist Mon Apr 16 10:02:01 2001
+++ MakefileMon Apr 16 10:02:52 2001
@@ -847,7 +847,7 @@
make KERNEL=${KERNEL} DESTDIR=${RD}/
:It is my understanding that with the new directory layout strategies, this
:will be improved somewhat. ie: a single page is much more likely to cache
:up to 8 directories.
:
:Cheers,
:-Peter
:--
:Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:"All of this is for nothing if
>There's no downside, really.
It just seems inelegant to have a system that, on paper, is
so inefficient. Can't we do better?
--
Justin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I've tried to use (bootable) CD-ROM as root filesystem (I want have
this because it's good alternative of fixit.flp), but it seems that
GENERIC kernel doesn't understand where is root filesystem.
What I did are:
- make a 2.88MB boot floppy image, which contains:
* GENERIC kernel (gzippe
Hi,
I've been doing some tty related work and found the FIO*
requests don't seem to be documented.
I've added some reasonable doc to tty.4 and put up the
the diff and html forms:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jwd/doc/tty.4.html
http://people.freebsd.org/~jwd/doc/tty.4.diff
Any comments a
:
:>There's no downside, really.
:
:It just seems inelegant to have a system that, on paper, is
:so inefficient. Can't we do better?
:
:--
:Justin
I don't consider it inefficient. Sure, if you look at this one aspect
of the caching taken out of context it may appear to be inefficie
10 matches
Mail list logo