Hi,
"ls -lh" does misalign the size field for symlinks (missing space in
front of the size), /usr/share/locale:
---snip---
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512B Jan 12 15:48 tr_TR.ISO8859-9
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15B Jan 12 15:43 tr_TR.ISO_8859-9 -> tr_TR.ISO8859-9
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512B J
Hello,
I've jest cvsuped to recent current and got some errors in dmesg buffer:
1)
Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
mymail.txt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
FYI: pam_setcred() call seems used in OpenSSH, ftpd, rshd, login, and su
already included in FreeBSD source code.
http://snapshots.jp.freebsd.org/tour/current/cgi-bin/global.cgi?pattern=pam_setcred&id=&type=reference>
imp> OK. This looks like a problem in 1.6.4p1 of sudo. It isn't a problem
i
Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from
FBSD 5.x series? Is the development on current branch
compiled using gcc 3.0 (or up)?
Is 5.x series going to be based on a preemptible kernel?
Thanks,
Alp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
[-hackers removed from CC. One list is enough.]
Alp Atici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from
> FBSD 5.x series? Is the development on current branch
> compiled using gcc 3.0 (or up)?
Yes. Not yet.
> Is 5.x series going to be based on a pree
Hi !
I have quite a big problem. I made "world" with newest CURRENT. Now I have
all binaries 5.0, but I can't get kernel to work. It compiles ok, installs
ok, but when I start system it's stops when it tells mounting root on
ufs://ad0s1a. (I used GENERIC as well as my own config)
I am using V
k Macy wrote:
>
> It turns that this problem is specific to AIO in
> -CURRENT. I wrote a simple program that uses
> the three different completion mechanisms (polling
> with aio_error, polling with kevent, and using SIGIO)
> to fill up a file by writing 8kb at a time to the
> file and then readin
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_280D_6E9D.0BCF"
Thanks for working on this. I was going to try running
a profiled kernel on -CURRENT and -STABLE to see what
the difference was in time distribution. On -STABLE
it built without a hitch. However, on -CURRENT I got
the following even after doing a make clean:
../../../libkern/mcount.c: In functio
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Alp Atici wrote:
> Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from FBSD 5.x
> series? Is the development on current branch compiled using gcc 3.0 (or
> up)?
>
> Is 5.x series going to be based on a preemptible kernel?
Can't answer the gcc question, but yes, John
Alp Atici wrote:
> Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from
> FBSD 5.x series? Is the development on current branch
> compiled using gcc 3.0 (or up)?
I think that the cut over will happen after the compiler
no longer core dumps on:
main()
{
int i;
Aleksander Rozman - Andy wrote:
> I have quite a big problem. I made "world" with newest CURRENT. Now I have
> all binaries 5.0, but I can't get kernel to work. It compiles ok, installs
> ok, but when I start system it's stops when it tells mounting root on
> ufs://ad0s1a. (I used GENERIC as well
In the last episode (Jan 19), Terry Lambert said:
> Alp Atici wrote:
> > Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from FBSD 5.x
> > series? Is the development on current branch compiled using gcc 3.0
> > (or up)?
>
> I think that the cut over will happen after the compiler
> no longer
Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the last episode (Jan 19), Terry Lambert said:
> > Alp Atici wrote:
> > > Is gcc 3.x going to be the default compiler starting from FBSD 5.x
> > > series? Is the development on current branch compiled using gcc 3.0
> > > (or up)?
> >
> > I think that th
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, k Macy wrote:
> Thanks for working on this. I was going to try running
> a profiled kernel on -CURRENT and -STABLE to see what
> the difference was in time distribution. On -STABLE
> it built without a hitch. However, on -CURRENT I got
> the following even after doing a make
16 matches
Mail list logo
