eh?
it seems regardless of the flags i'm giving to disklabel it prevents
me from editing/restoring/whatever labels. only thing i can do is
to read them.
single/multiuser makes no difference.
yes, i've tested _all_ the flags available. also i found no indication
from any mailing list i was able
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
> I've got somewhere another dc card which made problems. I guess
> it was PNIC.
I have a Netgear FA510 (32-bit CardBus).
When I insert it, I get:
cardbus0: Expecting link target, got 0x0
cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=80
cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=14, siz
Hi Mark,
> I have a Netgear FA510 (32-bit CardBus).
>
> cardbus0: Expecting link target, got 0x0
> cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=80
> cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=14, size=400
> dc0: port 0x1000-0x107f mem 0x88002400-0x880027ff irq
> 11 at device 0.0 on ca
> Can you try this PR patch and see if it helps ? Note that the patch isn't
> 100% correct for other cards and will break them.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/35482
That patch (plus a couple of others from other PRs) is already applied.
No help.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 12:32:47PM +0300, mika ruohotie wrote:
>
> eh?
>
> it seems regardless of the flags i'm giving to disklabel it prevents
> me from editing/restoring/whatever labels. only thing i can do is
> to read them.
>
> single/multiuser makes no difference.
[snip]
I am not really
I've recompiled libc twice today because of the changes in wchar.h
and I've noticed two or maybe three error messages fly by during
the compile.
The messages are from 'sort' and they go by so quickly I can't
quite make them out, but they say something like "open failed,
no such directory or [some
Okay, I just found out about the 'script' command :-)
When compiling libc I see several of these 'sort' errors:
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -DLIBC_MAJOR=5 -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include
-I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DINET6
-I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc -DPOSIX_MISTAKE
Hello
I'm running current on my laptop, when I close the lid, the screen goes black, but
when I open again the screen goes on but everything is locked, how can I solve this?
Here's my hw.acpi:
hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5
hw.acpi.sleep_button_state: S1
hw.acpi.lid_switch_state: S1
hw.acpi.st
Try doing: sysctl -w hw.acpi.lid_switch_state=NONE
Does that help?
Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Vice President __
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ]
WurldLink Corporation
Nope it still locked up
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 07:45:50 -1000 (HST)
Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try doing: sysctl -w hw.acpi.lid_switch_state=NONE
>
> Does that help?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Vice President __
> Unix Netw
Thanks for the help deleted the libc_r folder from my source dir, and
rebuilt the world and installed it and it worked, didn't even have to
reboot for it to notice the change, ran merge master and rebooted and
all is well, and xmms runs. Thanks for your help.
Jusitn
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 03:04,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, David Xu wrote:
> Yes, this is a known problem. I have a patch for this, you may
> download it from here:
> http://opensource.zjonline.com.cn/freebsd/vm86patch.tgz
Is there any chance of geting these committed? With them, my laptop is
happy to give a 100x37 screen on VESA_8
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
walt wrote:
>
> When compiling libc I see several of these 'sort' errors:
>
> cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -DLIBC_MAJOR=5 -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include
> -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DINET6
> -I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/lo
The source of the "sort: open failed: +1: No such file or directory"
message during compilation of libc is the shellscript /usr/bin/lorder.
/usr/bin/lorder contains these lines:
# sort symbols and references on the first field (the symbol)
sort +1 $R -o $R
sort +1 $S -o $S
My guess is that the
walt wrote:
> My guess is that the syntax of 'sort' has changed since lorder
> was modified in March of 2001(?)
David Wolfskill just pointed out to me that the behavior of 'sort'
is completely different in -STABLE, which I've just confirmed.
Does anyone else see this behavior in -CURRENT? What
Is anyone else still seeing Sig 11's from GCC when mcpu=pentiumpro is
enabled (as it appears to be by default now)? I get a segfault in the
same place every time when compiling a DIAGNOSTIC kernel when I leave it
enabled.
Just curious if this is just me or not...
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
To U
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 12:32:47PM +0300, mika ruohotie wrote:
>
> eh?
>
> it seems regardless of the flags i'm giving to disklabel it prevents
> me from editing/restoring/whatever labels. only thing i can do is
> to read them.
What error are you getting?
--
Crist J. Clark
I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem
with building CURRENT on STABLE at the moment?
--
>>> Kernel build for GOKU started on Sat Sep 21 2
20 matches
Mail list logo