Re: `cat /dev/io` leads to system lockup.

2002-12-20 Thread Sean Kelly
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:35:01PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Sean Kelly wrote: On my 5.0-CURRENT kernel built 45 minutes ago, I can bring my system to its knees by doing # cat /dev/io While I understand that this isn't exactly something one would normally be

Re: `cat /dev/io` leads to system lockup.

2002-12-20 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Sean Kelly wrote: On my 5.0-CURRENT kernel built 45 minutes ago, I can bring my system to its knees by doing # cat /dev/io While I understand that this isn't exactly something one would normally be doing, is it really something that should bring the system down? No.

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-20 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: ssh authentification broken, only public keys work

2002-12-20 Thread Fred Souza
I got this tonight on my ultra. I thought it was sparc64 specific, glad I saw your post. I cvsup'd 2 days ago. Im going to build OpenSSH from ports and see if it has the same error. I posted here about three or four days ago, saying that using the ports' version is a workaround to this

Re: `cat /dev/io` leads to system lockup.

2002-12-20 Thread Scott Long
Sean Kelly wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:35:01PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Sean Kelly wrote: On my 5.0-CURRENT kernel built 45 minutes ago, I can bring my system to its knees by doing # cat /dev/io While I understand that this isn't exactly something one would

Re: PFIL_HOOKS should be made default in 5.0

2002-12-20 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:46:44PM -0800, Sam Leffler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #ifndef PFIL_HOOKS #error You must specify PFIL_HOOKS when using ipfilter #endif Unfortunately there's no way that I know to express this if ipfilter is loaded as a module. Duh, there'll probably be

Re: ssh authentification broken, only public keys work

2002-12-20 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:27:53AM +0100, Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since yesterday I cannot login to my CURRENT machine anymore after a world and reboot ... I really hope this doesn't got MFC'd to RELENG_5_0 ... debug1: Calling cleanup 0x8061180(0x0) debug1: PAM: cleanup

Re: ssh authentification broken, only public keys work

2002-12-20 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, Disable ChallengeResponseAuthentication, set it to no and you'll have ssh again. -- Thanks, I'll try it at home this evening ... Shouldn't we fix this the default config ? Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the

Re: UMASS USB bug? (getting the Sony disk-on-key device working)

2002-12-20 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 05:11:32PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: I found another couple of bugs, this time in OHCI's DMA buffer chaining code. Great. A patch for this with additional debugging code is included below (for current). There are two bugs. I do not know if

Re: Current hangs in reboot

2002-12-20 Thread Taavi Talvik
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Taavi Talvik wrote: After testing, it turns out, that 'hang on reboot' problem maybe related to mainboard (Gigabyte GA-8PE667 Ultra) and/or USB driver for Intel 82801DB. After turning off onboard USB rebooting works even if ACPI is enabled. It was necessary to disable only

Re: ssh authentification broken, only public keys work

2002-12-20 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2002-12-20 08:27:53 (+0100), Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since yesterday I cannot login to my CURRENT machine anymore after a world and reboot ... Same problem here (on Alpha and on i386, if it matters). Logging in with a public key works, without doesn't. Then the connection

xcpustate broken

2002-12-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
Can someone figure out why this port has recent become broken on i386 and alpha? http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/xcpustate-2.5.log Kris msg49119/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Panic in jail [patch].

2002-12-20 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
Hello. Initiated mutex for prison isn't destroyed on error. Kernel will on every error. Here You got patch for this: --- kern_jail.c.origFri Dec 20 15:11:10 2002 +++ kern_jail.c Fri Dec 20 15:14:03 2002 @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ PROC_UNLOCK(p); crfree(newcred); bail: +

Re: Panic in jail [patch].

2002-12-20 Thread Maxime Henrion
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: Hello. Initiated mutex for prison isn't destroyed on error. Kernel will on every error. I just committed your patch, thanks! Cheers, Maxime To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

if_tap is working ?

2002-12-20 Thread Yoshinori KASAZAKI
hi, guys. Does anyone have VMware2 port running successfully on -current ? my VMware2 port's startup script says /usr/local/etc/rc.d/vmware.sh: cannot create /compat/linux/dev/vmnet1: Device not configured I digged into this a little and found that this message is from the line echo -n

Re: PFIL_HOOKS should be made default in 5.0

2002-12-20 Thread Terry Lambert
Vallo Kallaste wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:46:44PM -0800, Sam Leffler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #ifndef PFIL_HOOKS #error You must specify PFIL_HOOKS when using ipfilter #endif Unfortunately there's no way that I know to express this if ipfilter is loaded as a module.

Re: if_tap is working ?

2002-12-20 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Hello, Yoshinori KASAZAKI wrote: hi, guys. Does anyone have VMware2 port running successfully on -current ? i'm :) my VMware2 port's startup script says /usr/local/etc/rc.d/vmware.sh: cannot create /compat/linux/dev/vmnet1: Device not configured I digged into this a little and found

Re: UMASS USB bug? (getting the Sony disk-on-key device working)

2002-12-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
:The NetBSD code is already different: :1.48 (augustss 15-Sep-99): /* The OHCI hardware can handle at :most one page crossing. */ :1.48 (augustss 15-Sep-99): if (OHCI_PAGE(dataphys) == :dataphysend || :1.48 (augustss 15-Sep-99):

pam_setenv() crashes rshd...

2002-12-20 Thread Mikhail Teterin
The rshd started to crash on my system after the recent -current upgrade. It does not dump core (why?), but with a lot of syslog() I narrowed the trouble spot down to the pam_setenv() calls -- the very first one of them, in rshd.c never returned... The libpam is: /usr/lib/libpam.so.2:

Re: `cat /dev/io` leads to system lockup.

2002-12-20 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Scott Long wrote: Many peripheral hardware device do not like having their registers blindly read (it's quite common for a read operation on a register to signal an ASIC that it's ok to do a certain action) and will respond with nasty things like interrupt storms, endless

Re: if_tap is working ?

2002-12-20 Thread Yoshinori KASAZAKI
hi. On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:42:46 -0800 Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Yoshinori KASAZAKI wrote: hi, guys. Does anyone have VMware2 port running successfully on -current ? i'm :) that's great :) my VMware2 port's startup script says

Re: PFIL_HOOKS should be made default in 5.0

2002-12-20 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:30:42AM -0800, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vallo Kallaste wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:46:44PM -0800, Sam Leffler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #ifndef PFIL_HOOKS #error You must specify PFIL_HOOKS when using ipfilter #endif Unfortunately

VLAN v.s. NIC with VLAN hardware support bug.

2002-12-20 Thread Dan Lukes
If there somebody failing to configure vlans on a nic with vlan-hardware support - read the PR 46405 (patch attached). It's apply to both current and stable. Dan -- Dan Lukes tel: +420 2 21914205, fax: +420 2 21914206 root of FIONet, KolejNET, webmaster of www.freebsd.cz AKA:

Re: PFIL_HOOKS should be made default in 5.0

2002-12-20 Thread Sergey Mokryshev
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote: On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:30:42AM -0800, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vallo Kallaste wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:46:44PM -0800, Sam Leffler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #ifndef PFIL_HOOKS #error You must specify PFIL_HOOKS

Re: if_tap is working ?

2002-12-20 Thread Mark Santcroos
This is coincidence, I was bored by this also today for making the symlink for the Nth time. Your patch however should be applied only on -CURRENT and not on -STABLE. (Also a 'ln -sf' would make the line above it unnecessary) If you could pursue this to a commit I and others would be very

netinet/tcp.h compile error

2002-12-20 Thread David Holm
Hi, when trying to install adasockets I got the following error message: /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:44: syntax error before tcp_seq /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:44: warning: data definition has no type or storage class /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:45: syntax error before tcp_cc

Re: PFIL_HOOKS should be made default in 5.0

2002-12-20 Thread Sergey Mokryshev
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Sergey Mokryshev wrote: Unfortunately nobody cares to look into PR database (conf/44576) In case PFIL_HOOKS really slows IP processing I don't mind keeping this out of GENERIC, however it should be noted in UPDATING and release notes. I did

Re: VLAN v.s. NIC with VLAN hardware support bug.

2002-12-20 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Dan Lukes wrote: If there somebody failing to configure vlans on a nic with vlan-hardware support - read the PR 46405 (patch attached). It's apply to both current and stable. Does fxp have hardware support for vlans? I use vlans extensively and never noticed a problem. --

Re: netinet/tcp.h compile error

2002-12-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 12:47:22AM +0100, David Holm wrote: Hi, when trying to install adasockets I got the following error message: /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:44: syntax error before tcp_seq /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:44: warning: data definition has no type or storage class

Re: mod_php4 4.2.3 under 5.0-CURRENT

2002-12-20 Thread Jens Rehsack
Muhannad Asfour wrote: Hi, I was searching on groups.google.com recently to try to find out how to get mod_php4 compiled under 5.0-CURRENT, and I found your message and thought you might be of some assistance. I recently built a new server and wanted to run 5.0-CURRENT on it. I installed

WEIRD! div() broken on -CURRENT?

2002-12-20 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
Okay, I must be losing my mind. Does anyone know why the following program compiled with stock gcc-3.2.1, stock CFLAGS, and no CPUTYPE produces: ddy.quot = 1 ddy.rem = -1077937744 on -CURRENT, and: ddy.quot = 8 ddy.rem = 0 On -stable? #include stdlib.h #include stdio.h main(void) {

No memory to boot

2002-12-20 Thread Vitor de Matos Carvalho
Hi :))) I am trying to give boot with the cd of the FreeBSD 5.0-rc1 alone that not of the o boot, gives acknowledgment of that kernel did not obtain to place memory enough to give boot. The machine is a AMD Ahtlon 900MHz with 256MB Ram. With the cd of the 4.4-release and the 4.6-release of the

Re: mod_php4 4.2.3 under 5.0-CURRENT

2002-12-20 Thread Jens Rehsack
Muhannad Asfour wrote: Here's the dmesg output: Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of tie University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Dec 20 00:32:59 EST 2002\M^J [EMAIL

Re: WEIRD! div() broken on -CURRENT?

2002-12-20 Thread Tim Robbins
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:24:39PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: Okay, I must be losing my mind. Does anyone know why the following program compiled with stock gcc-3.2.1, stock CFLAGS, and no CPUTYPE produces: ddy.quot = 1 ddy.rem = -1077937744 on -CURRENT, and: ddy.quot = 8

LOR while copying file to nfs

2002-12-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
lock order reversal 1st 0xc35f0648 vnode interlock (vnode interlock) @ /usr/src/sys/nfsclient/nfs_vnops.c:2629 2nd 0xc043d678 vm page queue mutex (vm page queue mutex) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:424 I got this just now while copying a large file (155187200 bytes) to a nfs volume (sparc

Re: LOR while copying file to nfs

2002-12-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:09:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: lock order reversal 1st 0xc35f0648 vnode interlock (vnode interlock) @ /usr/src/sys/nfsclient/nfs_vnops.c:2629 2nd 0xc043d678 vm page queue mutex (vm page queue mutex) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:424 I got this just now while

Re: WEIRD! div() broken on -CURRENT?

2002-12-20 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Tim Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-12-20 ] [ Subjecte: Re: WEIRD! div() broken on -CURRENT? ] On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:24:39PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: I'm doing something wrong, right? I mean, this can't be right. I've verified this now on a P4 running:

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-12-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: WEIRD! div() broken on -CURRENT?

2002-12-20 Thread Tim Robbins
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:43:25PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Tim Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-12-20 ] [ Subjecte: Re: WEIRD! div() broken on -CURRENT? ] On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:24:39PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: I'm doing something wrong, right? I mean, this

Re: VLAN v.s. NIC with VLAN hardware support bug.

2002-12-20 Thread Dan Lukes
Daniel C. Sobral wrote, On 12/21/02 00:31: Dan Lukes wrote: If there somebody failing to configure vlans on a nic with vlan-hardware support - read the PR 46405 (patch attached). It's apply to both current and stable. Does fxp have hardware support for vlans? I use vlans

Re: VLAN v.s. NIC with VLAN hardware support bug.

2002-12-20 Thread Dan Lukes
At 10:22 PM 20/12/2002 +0100, Dan Lukes wrote: If there somebody failing to configure vlans on a nic with vlan-hardware support - read the PR 46405 (patch attached). Mike Tancsa wrote, On 12/20/02 22:46: Does this bug show up in the trunk ports statistics as runt packets ?

Re: VLAN v.s. NIC with VLAN hardware support bug.

2002-12-20 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 02:45 AM 12/21/2002 +0100, Dan Lukes wrote: At 10:22 PM 20/12/2002 +0100, Dan Lukes wrote: If there somebody failing to configure vlans on a nic with vlan-hardware support - read the PR 46405 (patch attached). Mike Tancsa wrote, On 12/20/02 22:46: Does this bug show up

-CURRENT panic on SMP Athlon box.

2002-12-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
My SMP Athlon box paniced again tonight, and this time my serial console caught it in the act. I have no idea what has caused this, and have no idea if it has any significance for 5.0-R or not. I wonder if we have a memory leak ? Poul-Henning login: panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too