--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
First off, I'm very pissed off about this, but not going to bring out the
big stick of death, because, well, it can't matter enough if I'm the only
poor soul seeing this, despite how many hours I wasted thinking maybe it
was the fault of my code.
In 5.0-CURRENT, since last month or so, I've been h
Yes modified floppies would be great.
I dont really get this. When I read the installation intructions I
understood it as that all hardware listed in HARDWARE.txt is supported
not only by FreeBSD by it self but also available on the floppies. But
this isnt the case or?
/Kalle
Matthew N. Dodd
> Ok, after digging a bit I noticed that the super block layout
> has changed in a way that makes it incompatible with previous
> super blocks. It appears to be the alignment of fs_uuid on
> revision 1.36 of sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h.
The trick of biting of bits of a char array to make non-char fields
ofte
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:50:40AM +0100, Karl-Petter Åkesson wrote:
> Yes modified floppies would be great.
>
> I dont really get this. When I read the installation intructions I
> understood it as that all hardware listed in HARDWARE.txt is supported
> not only by FreeBSD by it self but also a
leafy wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:50:40AM +0100, Karl-Petter Åkesson wrote:
>
> >Yes modified floppies would be great.
> >
> >I dont really get this. When I read the installation intructions I
> >understood it as that all hardware listed in HARDWARE.txt is supported
> >not only by FreeBSD
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 06:56:39PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
>On 2003/01/05-00:25:17 leafy wrote:
>
>
>>lock order reversal
>>Jan 5 00:19:15 leafy kernel: 1st 0xc26b05c0 process lock (process lock)
>>@/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2099 Jan 5 00:19:15 leafy kernel:
Hi everybody. I'm a developer of the FreeSBIE project (just another
FreeBSD-on-a-live-cd project).
As default network configuration, we've reasonally chosen a dhcp
configuration, which is great on a dhcp network, but ugly when it has to
wait for timeout.
I also had the same problem with my mobile-p
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:30:16AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> Lately, the data field for sockets, which holds bytes ready (in the EVFILT_
> READ case) to be read, is computed to be zero. This means that if you have
> a low watermark which is >0 per the kq, THE EVENT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. Not to
>
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Since upgrading to -current I get the following on my sparc at boot time:
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0
Root mount failed: 22
(errno 22 is EINVAL). Someone told me this was already fixed (by
which commit?), but cvsupping again did not fix the problem. Any ideas?
Kris
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 12:12:04PM +0100, Piotr Kowalski wrote:
> only trying to do is build a winbind demon to retrieve user and groups
> database from Windows PDC, not to authenticate users with it - so the
> compilation shouldn't crash.
>
Hi,
The FreeBSD nsswitch cannot be used for WinBind (ye
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
-
Tim Robbins wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:30:16AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
>Lately, the data field for sockets, which holds bytes ready (in the
EVFILT_
>READ case) to be read, is computed to be zero. This means that if
you have
>a low watermark which is >0 per the kq, THE EVENT WILL NE
I orginally intended to send this message to freebsd-current as
well, but due to a typing error it was only sent to
freebsd-questions. Anyway here is it.
--
Guido
- Forwarded message from Guido Kollerie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:10:39 +0100
From: Guido Kollerie <[E
I've experienced a serious problem trying to implement Winbind Samba
feature, under FreeBSD 5,0 RC-2, where the SSWITCH service is finally
included.
Compilation of Winbind module of SAMBA 2.2.7a with WINBIND crashes !!!
I know there'll be problems with PAM modules of authentication but what I'm
Since upgrading to -current I get the following on my sparc at boot time:
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0
Root mount failed: 22
(errno 22 is EINVAL). Someone told me this was already fixed (by
which commit?), but cvsupping again did not fix the problem. Any ideas?
Kris
msg49936/pgp0.pg
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:58:21PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Ok, after digging a bit I noticed that the super block layout
> > has changed in a way that makes it incompatible with previous
> > super blocks. It appears to be the alignment of fs_uuid on
> > revision 1.36 of sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h.
>
>
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 21:16, Dario Freni wrote:
> Hi everybody. I'm a developer of the FreeSBIE project (just another
> FreeBSD-on-a-live-cd project).
> As default network configuration, we've reasonally chosen a dhcp
> configuration, which is great on a dhcp network, but ugly when it has to
> wait
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 12:22:27PM +0100, Rob Evers wrote:
> Edit src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h
> Add delta 1.37 2003.01.09.23.53.30 gordon
> Add delta 1.38 2003.01.10.06.59.34 marcel
Thanks, for some reason I didnt have this version when I cvsupped. It
boots now.
Kris
msg49940/pgp0.pgp
Descrip
Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:30:16AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
>
>
> >Lately, the data field for sockets, which holds bytes ready (in the
> EVFILT_
> >READ case) to be read, is computed to be zero. This means that if
> you have
> >a low watermark whic
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:13:34PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 21:16, Dario Freni wrote:
> > Hi everybody. I'm a developer of the FreeSBIE project (just another
> > FreeBSD-on-a-live-cd project).
> > As default network configuration, we've reasonally chosen a dhcp
> > conf
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 09:57:36PM +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:30:16AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
>
> > Lately, the data field for sockets, which holds bytes ready (in the EVFILT_
> > READ case) to be read, is computed to be zero. This means that if you have
> > a low
Reply to both and in ML
> > You could use the timeout option in dhclient.conf..
IMHO it's a risk.
> From man dhclient:
>
>The client can also be instructed to become a daemon imme-
>diately, rather than waiting until it has acquired an IP
>address. This can be done
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 03:03:57PM +0100, Dario Freni wrote:
> Reply to both and in ML
>
> > > You could use the timeout option in dhclient.conf..
>
> IMHO it's a risk.
>
> > From man dhclient:
> >
> >The client can also be instructed to become a daemon imme-
> >diately, rathe
On 2003-01-11 00:42, Tim Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From what I can tell, mbufs with m_type == MT_HEADER can store data
> as well as those with m_type == MT_DATA. This patch corrects the
> tests in sbcompress(), sbdrop(), sballoc() and sbfree() so that data
> stored in MT_HEADER mbufs is
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Guido Kollerie wrote:
Guido,
> Anyway hope this helps other people that are trying to install
> FreeBSD on a Compaq Evo Dxxx PC.
I had the same problem with the same Compaq Evo. Disabling DMA for the IDE
controller/device in the Compaq Setup/Bios solved it for me..
Greeting
* Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030109 21:34]: wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Trent Nelson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 11:16:57AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > Sounds like an atkbd or syscons problem.
> > > Did you suspend the laptop and resume before this happens?
> >
> > No. How
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 09:57:36PM +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:30:16AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> >
> > > Lately, the data field for sockets, which holds bytes ready (in the
EVFILT_
> > > READ case) to be read, is computed to be zero. This means that if you
have
Hello,
Is there a recommended way to configure multiple devfs rules (massive jail
usage) in a standard manner? I don't see any traces of it.
Or is it up to the user how does he manage this question, for example a
shell script with the rules?
Thanks!
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fs
i have had the same problem with 5.0 & with every 4.x i've tried using a xircom
pccard with a thinkpad t22. it occurred to me to install with a cdrom & then
get the card running but was afraid to wipe my linux installation in case the
card still didn't work. linux isn't my os of choice, but to m
I just tried to upgrade a machine with current, and sysinstall doesn't seem to
identify swap
anymore.
Sometimes I want warnings, but I don't want swap. I made a quick patch to add a no
swap option.
Maybe some warnings should be wrapped with "if (msgYesNo())" to give the user more
choice?
http
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Karl-Petter Åkesson wrote:
> Yes modified floppies would be great.
>
> I dont really get this. When I read the installation intructions I
> understood it as that all hardware listed in HARDWARE.txt is supported
> not only by FreeBSD by it self but also available on
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Sam Leffler wrote:
> unless the mbufs are specifically tagged as such. I'm not clear on exactly
> what sb_ctl is supposed to count; the comment in the cvs log is unclear:
>
> "Track the number of non-data chararacters stored in socket buffers so that
> the data value returned
On 10-Jan-2003 David Yeske wrote:
> I just tried to upgrade a machine with current, and sysinstall doesn't seem to
>identify swap
> anymore.
I'm working on fixing this bug atm. It's a problem with GEOM not reporting
enough information to libdisk/sysinstall.
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Karl-Petter Åkesson wrote:
> > Yes modified floppies would be great.
> >
> > I dont really get this. When I read the installation intructions I
> > understood it as that all hardware listed in HARDWARE.txt is supported
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> When is this "unset acpi_load" done? I can provide the info rqd.
At the "booting in 10 seconds" prompt. Hit space and type it in.
-Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the messag
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Sam Leffler wrote:
> > unless the mbufs are specifically tagged as such. I'm not clear on
exactly
> > what sb_ctl is supposed to count; the comment in the cvs log is unclear:
> >
> > "Track the number of non-data chararacters stored in socket buffers so
that
> > the data val
David Coder wrote:
>
> i have had the same problem with 5.0 & with every 4.x i've tried using a xircom
> pccard with a thinkpad t22. it occurred to me to install with a cdrom & then
> get the card running but was afraid to wipe my linux installation in case the
> card still didn't work. linux is
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a recommended way to configure multiple devfs rules (massive jail
> usage) in a standard manner? I don't see any traces of it.
> Or is it up to the user how does he manage this question, for example a
> shell script with the rules?
Ther
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> Juli Mallett pointed me at the following reproduceable problem on my
> -current notebook with userland/kernel dated Dec 29:
>
> paprika:~/freebsd/test/pthread> ./test
> 1
> 2
> 1
> 2
> 1
> 2
> load: 0.02 cmd: test 910 [running] 0.00u 0.01s 0% 824k
> 1
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> > I can definitely reproduce this here and also fairly angry about it.
> > In addition to what you mentioned, fstat() gives an incorrect st_size
> > result now and it's likely that non-NOTE_LOWAT low watermarks are
> > firing too early as well.
> >
> > Ugly test program
Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Sam Leffler wrote:
> > What are "non-data characters"?
>
> A very zen question. :) In this case, It probably means bytes carried in
> an mbuf with a type other than MT_DATA.
Characters that won't come back from a read(2).
The point of the EVFILT_READ c
are usbd and moused are turned on.
/ayn
On 0, Mark Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running a toshiba portege 4000 with -CURRENT as of January 9.
> Suspending and resuming runs fine apart from USB, on resume it is unable
> to recognise my USB mouse (logitech), nothing even registers tha
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 01:55:24PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> (We really should figure out how to implement the _r functions,
> because a POSIX.1-2001 system with threads is supposed to have them.)
How do these functions need to be implemented? Is it sufficient
to re-implement the non-reentr
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Attila Nagy wrote:
> Is there a recommended way to configure multiple devfs rules (massive jail
> usage) in a standard manner? I don't see any traces of it.
> Or is it up to the user how does he manage this question, for example a
> shell script with the rules?
If you are usi
Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> > > I can definitely reproduce this here and also fairly angry about it.
> > > In addition to what you mentioned, fstat() gives an incorrect st_size
> > > result now and it's likely that non-NOTE_LOWAT low watermarks are
> > > firing too early as w
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Hi there, i was just wondering if anyone out there used Courier Imap on
current using authpam? ... In the last couple days i upgraded both my
current installation (from about 1 week old, to CURRENT current) and the
courier-imap port. After this, i noticed that my courier imap stopped
working... i t
Hi there, i was just wondering if anyone out there used Courier Imap on
current using authpam? ... In the last couple days i upgraded both my
current installation (from about 1 week old, to CURRENT current) and the
courier-imap port. After this, i noticed that my courier imap stopped
working... i t
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 01:55:24PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > (We really should figure out how to implement the _r functions,
> > because a POSIX.1-2001 system with threads is supposed to have them.)
>
> How do these functions need to be implemented? Is it sufficie
On 2003-01-10 19:06:18 (-0500), Jeff Utter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there, i was just wondering if anyone out there used Courier Imap on
> current using authpam? ...
Yeps...
> In the last couple days i upgraded both my current installation (from about
> 1 week old, to CURRENT current) and
I got an old P100 I'm preparing for NAT duty at a Linux meeting and I
tried to install 5.0-RC2 on it. Near end of mfsroot.flp loading I get:
zf_read: unexpected EOF
but it continues booting. Just after normal msgs about fd0 & ppc, it
starts spewing unending messages so fast I can't read the
Taavi Talvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Attila Nagy wrote:
>
> > Is there a recommended way to configure multiple devfs rules (massive jail
> > usage) in a standard manner? I don't see any traces of it.
> > Or is it up to the user how does he manage this question, for exampl
Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:30:16AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
>
> > Lately, the data field for sockets, which holds bytes ready (in the EVFILT_
> > READ case) to be read, is computed to be zero. This means that if you have
> > a low watermark which is >0 per the kq, THE EVENT
* De: Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-10 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Serious issues with kqueue on sockets on CURRENT. ]
> In case anybody wants to play, I seem to recall some changes in uipc_socket.c
> that caused some problems (totally hosed the resolver) a while back:
>
Both are turned on yes. Restarting both doesn't work, nothing works when
plugged into the usb ports after a resume.
Cheers,
Mark
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 07:49, Andrew Y Ng wrote:
> are usbd and moused are turned on.
>
> /ayn
>
> On 0, Mark Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm running a to
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
* Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030109 21:34]: wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Trent Nelson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 11:16:57AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > Sounds like an atkbd or syscons problem.
> > > Did you suspend the laptop and resume before this happens?
> >
> > No. How
60 matches
Mail list logo
