hi,
I have installed FreeBSD 4.7R on a compaq proliant
dl360 G3 to find out that the nics are not being
recognized.. has this been dealt with in current ?
--
Does artificial plants need artificial water ?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the
On Saturday 22 February 2003 08:55 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Just in case anyone tries to build today's current and sees
it fail because of boot2, you can always set BOOT2_UFS=UFS1_ONLY
or BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY in your make.conf and rebuild.
I added BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY to my make.conf, and my
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
I'v cvsup'ed from 5.0-RELEASE to RELENG_5_0_0 last night and ACPI doesn't
work now.
When booting I'v got a message: ACPI autoload failed - no such file or
directory.
How to fix?
That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed.
When you install your
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:18:42PM -0800, Terry Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought this was the default in 5.x GENERIC; has someone turned
these options off in the default config?!?
I certainly haven't seen changes to locore.s, pmap.c, and machdep.c
that would fix the problem by
Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:18:42PM -0800, Terry Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought this was the default in 5.x GENERIC; has someone turned
these options off in the default config?!?
I certainly haven't seen changes to locore.s, pmap.c, and machdep.c
that
I thought this was the default in 5.x GENERIC; has someone turned
these options off in the default config?!?
I certainly haven't seen changes to locore.s, pmap.c, and machdep.c
that would fix the problem by working around the CPU bug.
Can't say anything for Paul's case, he probably
Hello Soeren,
I am sorry, but the last demsg output I have sent was not complete. I
had captured that from /var/log/messages which does not seem to contain
everything...
Enclosed is a new one done with a serial console. Here I think the
culprit can be seen as lines like:
(probe2:ata2:0:0:0):
It seems Michael Class wrote:
Hello Soeren,
I am sorry, but the last demsg output I have sent was not complete. I
had captured that from /var/log/messages which does not seem to contain
everything...
Enclosed is a new one done with a serial console. Here I think the
culprit can be
Hi!
Here on my system it does not help :-(, I've never had atapicam configured.
Christian.
On Sunday, 23. February 2003 11:17, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Michael Class wrote:
Hello Soeren,
I am sorry, but the last demsg output I have sent was not complete. I
had captured that from
Thank you for your info., Giorgos.
BOOT2_UFS=UFS1_ONLY in /etc/make.conf made my buildworld OK.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Michael Class wrote:
Hello Soeren,
I am sorry, but the last demsg output I have sent was not complete. I
had captured that from /var/log/messages which does not seem to contain
everything...
Enclosed is a new one done with a
use the latest RELENG_4
L. Jankok ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
hi,
I have installed FreeBSD 4.7R on a compaq proliant
dl360 G3 to find out that the nics are not being
recognized.. has this been dealt with in current ?
--
Does artificial plants need artificial water ?
To Unsubscribe:
That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed.
When you install your new kernel, use the Makefile target, instead
of using cp, or it won't install the modules it builds.
If you did this, then check your make.conf to see if you are
specifically telling it to not build modules,
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Yamada Ken Takeshi wrote:
I have the following error with make buildworld since
Feb. 21th, 0900GMT with my P3x2 box.
boot2 seems exceeding the size limit, any fix?
Same here, with the sources of today (upped en builded twice, but both
time's the same error)
Regards,
Can somebody please use cvs update -D date to do a binary search and
identify which exact commit caused the problem ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to
Hi
I've had a resurgence of these starting a few days ago. Basically
whenever there is fairly heavy IO (I mean as heavy as IO can get on
a COM port) the console starts spewing these messages.
[brane-dead] ~ # uptime
5:05PM up 1 day, 8:39, 1 user, load averages: 2.02, 2.10, 2.09
[brane-dead]
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
Sun Feb 23 03:38:01 EST 2003
cvs [update aborted]: /work/repo/CVSROOT: No such file or directory
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sunday, 23. February 2003 14:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can somebody please use cvs update -D date to do a binary search and
identify which exact commit caused the problem ?
The kernel of '2/20/2003 19:55 GMT' boots fine, but the kernel of '2/20/2003
20:03 GMT' doesn't. The commits in
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
Sun Feb 23 11:38:00 EST 2003
cvs [update aborted]: /work/repo/CVSROOT: No such file or directory
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
It seems that I managed to break the tagged queueing support somehow,
so please disable tags while I look hunt for the problem..
I'll commit a disable tags patch to -current in a few...
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the
I have corrected a number of problems on Serverworks ALI chipsets
and it has been committed to -current.
There is an outstanding problem with having tags enabled on ATA disks,
and I have temporarily disabled tags support until I nail that nasty
problem.
So please update your sources and let me
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, David Syphers wrote:
David,
I added BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY to my make.conf, and my buildworld still dies in
boot2. I'm trying to upgrade from a Feb. 19 -current (because it's crashing
all the time, and I need to enable debugging stuff). Is there a fix, or would
other
On 2003-02-22 22:49, Andre Guibert de Bruet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find myself waiting up to two seconds for data to flush to the terminal
on a 28 line 'ls -l'. net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack doesn't appear to cause
this behavior on 4.7-stable. Did we inadvertently break the 100ms clause
with
net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0.
This bug is already fixed:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3988161+0+archive/2003/cvs-all/20030223.cvs-all
--
Maxim Konovalov, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can somebody please use cvs update -D date to do a binary search and
identify which exact commit caused the problem ?
Hello,
I am getting the following result:
A Kernel check out with the following command works:
cvs -d /space/CVSROOT co -D 2003-02-20 00:00-P src
the
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
I had to add two lines to my make.conf to get boot2 to compile:
UFS2_BOOT=UFS1_ONLY
UFS1_ONLY=yes
If you are using UFS2 you need to edit appropriately, of course.
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 03:54:30PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed.
When you install your new kernel, use the Makefile target, instead
of using cp, or it won't install the modules it builds.
If you did this, then check your
This problem started about Feb 19 and continues thru today's updates.
Everything seems to work great until I shut down the X server
at which time I get a fatal 'page fault while in kernel mode.'
I have two -CURRENT machines at the moment and only the one
with the nVidia driver (and kernel module)
MODULES_WITH_WORLD causes modules to be installed during installworld.
But when you later do installkernel, it renames /boot/kernel to
/boot/kernel.old, so all your modules end up there. Don't use
MODULES_WITH_WORLD, or use ``make reinstallkernel'' which is safe
for MODULES_WITH_WORLD
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 03:54:30PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed.
When you install your new kernel, use the Makefile target, instead
of using cp, or it won't install the modules it builds.
If
walt wrote:
This problem started about Feb 19 and continues thru today's updates.
Everything seems to work great until I shut down the X server
at which time I get a fatal 'page fault while in kernel mode.'
I have two -CURRENT machines at the moment and only the one
with the nVidia driver
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
MODULES_WITH_WORLD causes modules to be installed during installworld.
But when you later do installkernel, it renames /boot/kernel to
/boot/kernel.old, so all your modules end up there. Don't use
MODULES_WITH_WORLD, or use ``make reinstallkernel'' which is safe
On Sunday 23 February 2003 11:10 am, Richard Arends wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, David Syphers wrote:
I added BOOT2_UFS=UFS2_ONLY to my make.conf, and my buildworld still dies
in boot2. I'm trying to upgrade from a Feb. 19 -current (because it's
crashing all the time, and I need to enable
Terry Lambert wrote:
walt wrote:
This problem started about Feb 19 and continues thru today's updates.
Everything seems to work great until I shut down the X server
at which time I get a fatal 'page fault while in kernel mode.'
I have two -CURRENT machines at the moment and only the one
with the
.
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1225336+0+archive/2003/cvs-all/20030223.cvs-all
--
Maxim Konovalov, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Hi,
does anybody know wether FreeBSD supports PCMCIA cards for wireless lan based
on 802.11g (54MBit/s) standard?
Sincerley
Gerald Mixa
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:24:48 -0700 (MST)
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
James E. Flemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: There are some non-if_* modules in there now that seem to
: be only documented in /usr/src, exca is a good example.
exca
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 06:51:19PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 04:53:07PM -0800, Kirk McKusick wrote:
I have tried running my test machine out of filesystem space
(repeatedly) and have not been able to get this panic. I will
keep running that test in the hopes that
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 01:37:24PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hmm. The machines that have panicked are likely to have been under
extreme disk load at the time they ran out of space (e.g. extracting
several dozen large tarballs simultaneously) [1]. I'll have to see if
I can trigger
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:24:48 -0700 (MST)
: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: In message:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: James E. Flemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: : There are some non-if_* modules
Hello,
I've just noticed that recent -CURRENT kernels (from at least 2 days
to now, but I suspect it might be a little longer) do not find my
ATAPI CDROM drive. The kernel config file is the same as before,
kernel CFLAGS are also the same (and I've even tried building the
kernel without
auth 60ff6b89 unsubscribe freebsd-current [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 02:49:52PM -0600, David Syphers wrote:
fails. (Am I correct in assuming a 5.0-R install defaults to UFS2?)
You are not correct. 5.0-R, and infact 5-CURRENT still default to ufs1.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body
David Syphers wrote:
Okay, I've verified that the problem is due to rev. 1.39 of
/usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h. Peter Wemm pointed out that the problem is not the
commit, but gcc's bad handling of 64-bit operations. Nonetheless, this commit
does break world for a lot of people... is there some
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 07:27, Gerald Mixa wrote:
does anybody know wether FreeBSD supports PCMCIA cards for wireless lan based
on 802.11g (54MBit/s) standard?
Nope..
802.11g isn't a final standard yet either (note no WiFi logo on 11g
stuff)
Personally I'd wait a bit until the standard is
On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 10:22, Orion Hodson wrote:
The VIA8233/8235 audio driver has undergone another revision in an attempt to
provide support for the VIA8235. The code is in -CURRENT as of 5 minutes ago.
Several people have reported quiet/inaudible sound on P4 boards with this
Hello gang. Nothing big, but important...
Can someone tell me if the machdep.guessed_bootdev sysctl is helpful at
all? I think it's a waste, and it's pretty limited and only available
on the i386.
It currently guesses 'wd' instead of 'ad' for the dev. nodes, .e.g:
hiten:~/ sysctl
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
David Syphers wrote:
Okay, I've verified that the problem is due to rev. 1.39 of
/usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h. Peter Wemm pointed out that the problem is not the
commit, but gcc's bad handling of 64-bit operations. Nonetheless, this commit
does
From: David Syphers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kirk McKusick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BOOT2_UFS=UFS1_ONLY works for today's current
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:49:52 -0600
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 23 February 2003 11:10 am, Richard Arends
Fred Souza wrote:
I've just noticed that recent -CURRENT kernels (from at least 2 days
to now, but I suspect it might be a little longer) do not find my
ATAPI CDROM drive.
This happened to me today, but it turned out that the drive wasn't
recognized after a reboot if there was an audio CD
Hiten Pandya wrote:
Hello gang. Nothing big, but important...
Can someone tell me if the machdep.guessed_bootdev sysctl is helpful at
all? I think it's a waste, and it's pretty limited and only available
on the i386.
It currently guesses 'wd' instead of 'ad' for the dev. nodes, .e.g:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Hiten Pandya wrote:
Can someone tell me if the machdep.guessed_bootdev sysctl is helpful at
all? I think it's a waste, and it's pretty limited and only available
on the i386.
It is not helpful. Someone removed the initialization of the kernel
variable bootdev for
Bruce Evans wrote:
Personally, I think the changes should be #ifdef'ed the current
version of GCC; when GCC rev's, hopefully its 64 bit operations
handling will have improved.
This would wrong, since ufs2 depends on the changes to actually work
for file systems larger than about 1TB.
If
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hiten Pandya writes:
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hello gang. Nothing big, but important...
Can someone tell me if the machdep.guessed_bootdev sysctl is helpful at
all? I think it's a waste, and it's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:10:59AM +0100) wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hiten Pandya writes:
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hello gang. Nothing big, but important...
Can someone tell me if the
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
Personally, I think the changes should be #ifdef'ed the current
version of GCC; when GCC rev's, hopefully its 64 bit operations
handling will have improved.
This would wrong, since ufs2 depends on the changes to actually
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, I wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Hiten Pandya wrote:
Can someone tell me if the machdep.guessed_bootdev sysctl is helpful at
all? I think it's a waste, and it's pretty limited and only available
on the i386.
It is not helpful. Someone removed the initialization of
Before blaming me, i know it is not supported for 5.x or -current, but i
think some of us have that stuff already running on -current.
I've been in hospital for many weeks and now i updated my system (late
November) to the currents current. After adding the missing include, i
successfully
59 matches
Mail list logo
