I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network and
one for the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the same
switch. All connections are 1000tx Full Duplex.
I will call the servers Box A, Box B, and Box C.
When i FTP data between
Hello List,
I've installed a testing system with readonly /usr filesystem.
And I was surprised by following weekly report (BTW locate
database rebuilded just fine):
-
Rebuilding whatis database:
makewhatis: /usr/share/man/whatis.tmp: Read-only file system
makewhatis:
On 05/08/2010 05:08 AM, joe wrote:
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network
and one for the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the
same switch. All connections are 1000tx Full Duplex.
I will call the servers Box A, Box B,
On 05/08/2010 05:54 AM, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Have you tried to disable TSO / LRO?
Fabien
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network and one for
the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the same switch.
All connections
Hi, just turned on WITNESS as my laptop freezes from time to time and
among the many LORs, here's a new one:
lock order reversal:
1st 0xc09f3484 sysctl lock (sysctl lock) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c:1521
2nd 0xc0eed504 ACPI Docking Station (ACPI Docking Station) @
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
new. I do use SUJ.
lock order reversal:
1st 0xc48388d8 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c:502
2nd 0xec0fe304 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:11363
3rd 0xc49e56b8 ufs (ufs) @
joe wrote:
I have just tried your suggeston and it has no effect for me ;(
Do you have another brand of NIC that you can try? At least that
will isolate whether it's igb(4) or something else.
Ian
--
Ian Freislich
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network and
one for the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the same
switch. All connections are 1000tx Full Duplex.
I will call the servers Box A, Box B, and Box C.
When i FTP data between
On Fri, 7 May 2010 13:52:15 -0700
Ben Widawsky widaw...@gmail.com wrote:
If a debugger attaches to a suspended process, the process will be
resumed, and backgrounded. This seems like the incorrect behavior to me
based what I read in the man page. The tracing process will see the
newly-traced
On 05/08/2010 06:55 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
I have just tried your suggeston and it has no effect for me ;(
Do you have another brand of NIC that you can try? At least that
will isolate whether it's igb(4) or something else.
Ian
--
Ian Freislich
I will grab a new nic
joe wrote:
On 05/08/2010 06:55 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
I have just tried your suggeston and it has no effect for me ;(
Do you have another brand of NIC that you can try? At least that
will isolate whether it's igb(4) or something else.
I will grab a new nic today
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
new. I do use SUJ.
lock order reversal:
1st 0xc48388d8 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c:502
2nd 0xec0fe304 bufwait (bufwait) @
- jfbterm
- boot splash
- apps that use libvgl (e.g. mplayer)
- other uses for graphic modes
Is there a way to avoid recompiling kernel just to use them?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On 05/08/2010 11:17 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
On 05/08/2010 06:55 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
I have just tried your suggeston and it has no effect for me ;(
Do you have another brand of NIC that you can try? At least that
will isolate whether it's igb(4) or
Looks like something to do with system C, you might isolate it, and try a
back
to back connection with its NICs, change cables, look at BIOS settings,
change
the slot the nic is in... All just off the top of my head.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:41 AM, joe j...@hostedcontent.com wrote:
On
On 05/08/2010 01:31 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
Looks like something to do with system C, you might isolate it, and try
a back
to back connection with its NICs, change cables, look at BIOS settings,
change
the slot the nic is in... All just off the top of my head.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:41
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 18:00:50 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/8 Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net:
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
new. I do use SUJ.
lock order reversal:
1st
I still am not clear on this system, how many ports are on it, and its an
82576?
Sounds to me like you've proven its not on the box if you can do fine when
its
on its own. So change ports in the switch, as I said, change cables, must be
something in that environment.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at
2010/5/8 Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net:
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 18:00:50 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/8 Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net:
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
new. I do
On 05/08/2010 01:53 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
I still am not clear on this system, how many ports are on it, and its
an 82576?
Sounds to me like you've proven its not on the box if you can do fine
when its
on its own. So change ports in the switch, as I said, change cables, must be
something in that
The cable, its a simple thing but make SURE you try that, a slightly
damaged one can do weird things and its quick to check, don't overlook
it.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM, joe j...@hostedcontent.com wrote:
On 05/08/2010 01:53 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
I still am not clear on this
On 05/08/2010 02:21 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
The cable, its a simple thing but make SURE you try that, a slightly
damaged one can do weird things and its quick to check, don't overlook
it.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM, joe j...@hostedcontent.com
mailto:j...@hostedcontent.com wrote:
Hello,
Anyone encountered this panic on recent CURRENT kernel?
[r...@test ~]# uname -a
FreeBSD test 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #16: Sun May 2 00:24:12 PDT 2010
r...@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
[r...@test /home/freebsd/sys/modules/bwn]# ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev bwn0
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote:
Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to
read and work email and wireless stuffs.
Could you please test this symptom with attached patch? It looks in
CURRENT it missed to initialize a
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:27:31PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/6 Weongyo Jeong weongyo.je...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:42:16PM +0200, Gustau P?rez wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been testing the driver for a few time with AMD64/CURRENT. A
On Sat, 8 May 2010, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
Anyone encountered this panic on recent CURRENT kernel?
db bt
Tracing pid 1795 tid 100096 td 0xff0003d8b390
uart_z8530_class() at 0
ifc_simple_create() at ifc_simple_create+0x89
if_clone_createif() at if_clone_createif+0x64
ifioctl() at
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of changes
are not yet complete.
Is the coast clear yet? :) I have been holding off on updating -current
due to the SUJ stuff, but that seems to have mostly settled down now, so
I'm hoping that
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:00:32PM -0700, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
Anyone encountered this panic on recent CURRENT kernel?
[r...@test ~]# uname -a
FreeBSD test 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #16: Sun May 2 00:24:12 PDT
2010 r...@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
On May 8, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
Anyone encountered this panic on recent CURRENT kernel?
[r...@test ~]# uname -a
FreeBSD test 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #16: Sun May 2 00:24:12 PDT
2010 r...@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
[r...@test
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of changes
are not yet complete.
Is the coast clear yet? :) I have been holding off on updating -current
due to the SUJ stuff, but that seems to have mostly settled
On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of
changes
are not yet complete.
Is the coast clear yet? :) I have been holding off on updating -current
due to the SUJ stuff,
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 04:11:49PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
[r...@test ~]# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.1
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change
On Sat, 8 May 2010, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
Anyone encountered this panic on recent CURRENT kernel?
[r...@test ~]# uname -a
FreeBSD test 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #16: Sun May 2 00:24:12 PDT 2010
r...@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
[r...@test
On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of
changes
are not yet complete.
What performance differences, if any, can we expect on uniprocessors
from the vm page lock-related
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of
changes
are not yet complete.
Is the coast clear yet? :) I have been holding off on
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 4:20 PM, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of
changes
are not yet complete.
What performance differences, if any,
On 08.05.2010 22:30 (UTC+1), Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of changes
are not yet complete.
Is the coast clear yet? :) I have been holding off on updating -current
due to the SUJ stuff, but that seems to
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Brandon Gooch
jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 4:20 PM, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days.
On 5/8/10, Kip Macy kip.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Brandon Gooch
jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 4:20 PM, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm
On Sat, 8 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 18:00:50 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/8 Ulrich Sp?rlein u...@spoerlein.net:
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
new. I do use
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 2:20 PM, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of
changes
are not yet complete.
What performance differences, if any,
2010/5/9 Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net:
On Sat, 8 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 18:00:50 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/8 Ulrich Sp?rlein u...@spoerlein.net:
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
This LOR also is not yet listed on
Hi jkim.
On Wed, 5 May 2010 13:51:10 -0400
Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
11 - 0x01 = +10C
11 - 0x18 = -13C
11 - 0x3f = -52C
[*] http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/31116.pdf
AMD keeps flipping the sign from core to core. :-( Please see
AMDTEMP_FLAG_DO_SIGN for Family
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:35 PM, ben wilber b...@desync.com wrote:
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 04:11:49PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
[r...@test ~]# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.1
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 09:59:23PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:35 PM, ben wilber b...@desync.com wrote:
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 04:11:49PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
[r...@test ~]# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.1
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright
45 matches
Mail list logo
