On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:26, David Xu wrote:
In Message-Id: <4c976f14.8000...@freebsd.org>
jhell wrote:
On 09/19/2010 09:28, David Xu wrote:
just typed sysctl -a on keyboard, and found it is slow, sometimes
it has been stuck for a few seconds, further studied,I found it is
stucked at sysctl ker
jhell wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:26, David Xu wrote:
In Message-Id: <4c976f14.8000...@freebsd.org>
jhell wrote:
On 09/19/2010 09:28, David Xu wrote:
just typed sysctl -a on keyboard, and found it is slow, sometimes
it has been stuck for a few seconds, further studied,I found it is
stucked
Your patch works fine for me, thanks!
However, I don't see any performance gain when using ccache:
# ccache -s
cache directory /usr/src/.ccache
cache hit (direct)65
cache hit (preprocessed) 397
cache miss225341
called for
On 2010-09-20 10:43, Dmitry Krivenok wrote:
Your patch works fine for me, thanks!
Note this patch is just a workaround for now, I'm still working on the
proper solution. :)
However, I don't see any performance gain when using ccache:
...
cache miss225341
...
cache
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Dmitry Krivenok
wrote:
> Your patch works fine for me, thanks!
> However, I don't see any performance gain when using ccache:
>
> Number of cache hits is very low.
> I need to understand this...
Make sure you have the following environment variables set:
CCACHE_H
On 19 September 2010 18:10, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 01:45:42 +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>
> > My company was in need for functionality similar to nextboot(8), but on
> > boot loader level, so we can have two partitions we boot from where one
> > is known to be g
On 09/21/10 02:21, David Xu wrote:
> jhell wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:26, David Xu wrote:
>> In Message-Id: <4c976f14.8000...@freebsd.org>
>>
>>> jhell wrote:
On 09/19/2010 09:28, David Xu wrote:
> just typed sysctl -a on keyboard, and found it is slow, sometimes
> it has been
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:46:56AM +0100, krad wrote:
> does it work for zfs boot as that would be really nice if it did?
No, it doesn't. ZFS works a bit differently. ZFS operate on pools, not
really on partitions. One ZFS file system can span multiple
disks/partitions. I'm not yet sure how to imp
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:17:38AM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Hi PJD!
>
> Can you this patcheset release for 7-STABLE?
I've no plans atm to port this work to 7-STABLE. I don't even have 7.x
systems anymore. Not sure how boot code differs, maybe the patch will
apply without modifications? No id
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:10:52PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 01:45:42 +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>
> > My company was in need for functionality similar to nextboot(8), but on
> > boot loader level, so we can have two partitions we boot from where one
> > is
on 20/09/2010 15:47 Pawel Jakub Dawidek said the following:
> No, it doesn't. ZFS works a bit differently. ZFS operate on pools, not
> really on partitions. One ZFS file system can span multiple
> disks/partitions. I'm not yet sure how to implement it, so it is
> intuitive, but I also haven't spend
W dniu 2010-09-20 12:27, Maxim Khitrov pisze:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Dmitry Krivenok
wrote:
Your patch works fine for me, thanks!
However, I don't see any performance gain when using ccache:
Number of cache hits is very low.
I need to understand this...
Make sure you have the foll
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:59:20PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 20/09/2010 15:47 Pawel Jakub Dawidek said the following:
> > No, it doesn't. ZFS works a bit differently. ZFS operate on pools, not
> > really on partitions. One ZFS file system can span multiple
> > disks/partitions. I'm not yet su
on 20/09/2010 16:37 John Hay said the following:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:59:20PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 20/09/2010 15:47 Pawel Jakub Dawidek said the following:
>>> No, it doesn't. ZFS works a bit differently. ZFS operate on pools, not
>>> really on partitions. One ZFS file system ca
On Saturday, September 18, 2010 12:09:21 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've uploaded a snapshot of the if_ath HAL which i've been working on.
> I've been refactoring out various bits of the AR5416 HAL into
> something that resembles the ath9k hardware MAC/PHY operations to make
> it easier
On Friday, September 17, 2010 7:45:42 pm Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> - Split code shared by almost any boot loader into separate files and
> clean up most layering violations:
I like this in general. I worry that the space constraints for boot2 will
prevent it from using this though as it dep
On 20 September 2010 14:37, John Hay wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:59:20PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 20/09/2010 15:47 Pawel Jakub Dawidek said the following:
> > > No, it doesn't. ZFS works a bit differently. ZFS operate on pools, not
> > > really on partitions. One ZFS file system
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 09/21/10 02:21, David Xu wrote:
jhell wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:26, David Xu wrote:
In Message-Id: <4c976f14.8000...@freebsd.org>
jhell wrote:
On 09/19/2010 09:28, David Xu wrote:
just typed sysctl -a on keyboard, and found i
On 20 September 2010 21:25, John Baldwin wrote:
> Why not include this iff both 'device ath' and 'device pci' are included?
> That is what is normally done for bus-specific attachments.
I've not idea right now whether there's an Atheros SoC with an
AHB-attached wireless device and a PCI bus. In
On Sun Sep 19 10, David Xu wrote:
> just typed sysctl -a on keyboard, and found it is slow, sometimes
> it has been stuck for a few seconds, further studied,I found it is
> stucked at sysctl kern.geom:
>
> %/usr/bin/time sysctl -a kern.geom
> kern.geom.collectstats: 1
> kern.geom.debugflags: 0
> k
On 09/21/10 00:01, David Xu wrote:
> Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>> On 09/21/10 02:21, David Xu wrote:
>>
>>> jhell wrote:
>>>
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:26, David Xu wrote:
In Message-Id: <4c976f14.8000...@freebsd.org>
> jhell wrote:
>
>> On 09/19/2010 0
On 09/02/10 17:48, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...]
Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
Now it is even easier to test ne
For all of you that are wondering what this means ;-)
If you don't do this you will see a crash early in boot
if witness/invariants is enabled...
At least I did..
Basically it will be a mtx_init() complaining about an unaligned
mtx... (netisr_mtx or some such).. see my previous queries from
> Message: 9
> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:04:47 +0800
> From: Adrian Chadd
> Subject: Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring
> To: Brandon Weisz
> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 19 September 2010 01:01, Adrian Chadd wrote:
24 matches
Mail list logo
