Hi,
Trying to cross build ARM fails in the following way on 8-stable:
8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Wed Jun 29 13:09:23 UTC 2011
make toolchain TARGET=arm
Is this perhaps also an issue in 9-current?
Any clues?
cc -O -pipe -ffreestanding -Wformat -I/usr/src/lib/libstand -msoft-float -
I have card based on AX88772B. I tried patch axe driver for vendor and device
IDs. card detected, set up link, but no data received. What else need for patch
in this driver ? Anybody have datasheet ?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
I see in my logs:
isp0: Polled Mailbox Command (0x54) Timeout (50us) (started @
isp_plogx:2122)
isp0: Mailbox Command 'EXECUTE IOCB A64' failed (TIMEOUT)
isp0: Chan 0 PLOGI 0x010500 failed
isp0: Polled Mailbox Command (0x64) Timeout (25us) (started @
isp_getpdb:2307)
isp0: Mailbox
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:22:36AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Trying to cross build ARM fails in the following way on 8-stable:
8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Wed Jun 29 13:09:23 UTC 2011
make toolchain TARGET=arm
Is this perhaps also an issue in 9-current?
Any clues?
On Thursday 30 June 2011 13:13:48 Olivier Houchard wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:22:36AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Trying to cross build ARM fails in the following way on 8-stable:
8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Wed Jun 29 13:09:23 UTC 2011
make toolchain
Antony Mawer wrote:
Not sure if this is the right place to post it -- about 6 years ago I
put together a module which displays an ASCII splash screen on boot
(rather than the graphical splash_pcx and splash_bmp modules).
As a user, I think this is rather cool; at least it is more useful for
me
On 6/30/2011 3:25 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I see in my logs:
isp0: Polled Mailbox Command (0x54) Timeout (50us) (started @
isp_plogx:2122)
isp0: Mailbox Command 'EXECUTE IOCB A64' failed (TIMEOUT)
isp0: Chan 0 PLOGI 0x010500 failed
isp0: Polled Mailbox Command (0x64) Timeout
Quoting Dennis Glatting d...@penx.com:
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 07:31 -0500, eculp wrote:
I just saw this box that is being promoted as a gaming machine at a
great price and am considering it as a web-server.
In addition to having no information on the CPU as a server lack of
comfort with 6
Hi,
I've installed FreeBSD 9 on a new server because 8.2 doesn't have support for
the LSI SAS2008 controller. I've also built the system as a ZFS-root box, and
I have to say that I'm quite happy with the disk performance: we're getting
about 500MB/s write and 675MB/s read. All in all, I'm
On 2011-06-30 17:26, Tim Gustafson wrote:
Hi,
I've installed FreeBSD 9 on a new server because 8.2 doesn't have support for
the LSI SAS2008 controller. I've also built the system as a ZFS-root box,
and I have to say that I'm quite happy with the disk performance: we're
getting about
On 30 June 2011 20:11, Niclas Zeising niclas.zeis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-06-30 17:26, Tim Gustafson wrote:
Hi,
I've installed FreeBSD 9 on a new server because 8.2 doesn't have support
for the LSI SAS2008 controller. I've also built the system as a ZFS-root
box, and I have to say
[Please remove current@ when replying.]
I created the first code drop for the ongoing GEM/KMS project. Please
note that this is not an end-user release, and even _not_ a call for
testing. The project is not finished yet, and I expect quite more
efforts from me even after the scheduled project
On 6/30/2011 4:22 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Trying to cross build ARM fails in the following way on 8-stable:
8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Wed Jun 29 13:09:23 UTC 2011
make toolchain TARGET=arm
Is this perhaps also an issue in 9-current?
Any clues?
cc -O -pipe -ffreestanding
Maybe i'm missing something but creating/removing large number of files
in one directory on tmpfs was very slow for me. That was long ago and
ZFS was in so i'll try to retest...
I decided to torture test tmpfs with bonnie++ on one of my machines and
the machine wedged. I can ping it but that's
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Mark Tinguely marktingu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/30/2011 4:22 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Trying to cross build ARM fails in the following way on 8-stable:
8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Wed Jun 29 13:09:23 UTC 2011
make toolchain TARGET=arm
Is
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Tim Gustafson t...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
Hi,
I've installed FreeBSD 9 on a new server because 8.2 doesn't have support for
the LSI SAS2008 controller. I've also built the system as a ZFS-root box,
and I have to say that I'm quite happy with the disk
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:44:48PM +0400, Andrey Smagin wrote:
I have card based on AX88772B. I tried patch axe driver for vendor and device
IDs. card detected, set up link, but no data received. What else need for
patch in this driver ? Anybody have datasheet ?
ASIX requires a login
On Jun 30, 2011, at 3:25 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I see in my logs:
isp0: Polled Mailbox Command (0x54) Timeout (50us) (started @
isp_plogx:2122)
isp0: Mailbox Command 'EXECUTE IOCB A64' failed (TIMEOUT)
This is most likely caused by a loss of interrupt
handling. Be it masked
I think you need something along the line of
ifconfig_bce0_alias0=inet 1.2.3.5 netmask ..., notice the
'inet', since aliasN can be used for both inet and inet6.
Got it, thanks!
I assume that's also recommended for the primary interface as well? I've added
the inet prefix to both lines and
On 2011-06-30 19:40, Tim Gustafson wrote:
I think you need something along the line of
ifconfig_bce0_alias0=inet 1.2.3.5 netmask ..., notice the
'inet', since aliasN can be used for both inet and inet6.
Got it, thanks!
I assume that's also recommended for the primary interface as well?
Someone already filed a PR for this (
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158266 ) and I'm
working on cleaning up the autoconf tests to work properly for $WORK
so we can upgrade to 5.6.1.1.
The problem is caused by the recent netinet / net content shuffling
and the fact that
On 06/30/11 07:43, eculp wrote:
Quoting Dennis Glatting d...@penx.com:
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 07:31 -0500, eculp wrote:
I just saw this box that is being promoted as a gaming machine at a
great price and am considering it as a web-server.
In addition to having no information on the CPU as a
Hello FreeBSDers,
After the starting of FreeBSD handbook translation, ArabBSD could attract
Ain Shams University which is one of the most important universities in
Egypt and Arab World to offer Free Summer Course for FreeBSD Administration
and FreeBSD development. The course will start by the
On Thursday 30 June 2011 18:59:04 Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Mark Tinguely marktingu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 6/30/2011 4:22 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Trying to cross build ARM fails in the following way on 8-stable:
8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE
Shouldn't that be 'make kernel-toolchain'?
Warner
On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Mark Tinguely marktingu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/30/2011 4:22 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Trying to cross build ARM fails in the following way on
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011, Eric McCorkle wrote:
I've both seen reports and experienced make buildworld with clang
failing in usr.bin/xlint/lint1 (really, make kernel-toolchain is what
fails), because lint1 is statically linked, and there is a definition of
__isnanf in both libc and libm. GCC,
TB --- 2011-06-30 21:40:13 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-30 21:40:13 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-06-30 21:40:13 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-30 21:40:31 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-30 21:40:31 -
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:34 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox
tinder...@freebsd.org wrote:
TB --- 2011-06-30 21:40:13 - tinderbox 2.7 running on
freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-30 21:40:13 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-06-30 21:40:13 - cleaning the object tree
On 30.06.2011 21:40, Tim Gustafson wrote:
I think you need something along the line of ifconfig_bce0_alias0=inet
1.2.3.5 netmask ...,
notice the 'inet', since aliasN can be used for both inet and inet6.
Got it, thanks!
I assume that's also recommended for the primary interface as well?
TB --- 2011-07-01 03:30:49 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-01 03:30:49 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-07-01 03:30:49 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-01 03:30:58 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-01 03:30:58 -
Ugh - bonnie++ creates a file that is twice the size of available
memory, and I have 16G of swap available. While ZFS already had most of
the memory wired for ARC. I shouldn't be surprised that the box was
printing swap zone exhausted
I'm an idiot. Can we replace the warning message with one
31 matches
Mail list logo
