Hello, Andriy.
You wrote 3 августа 2011 г., 16:36:32:
Just in case, signal 4 is SIGILL, an illegal instruction.
Maybe you are installing world that is built for a higher class CPU.
Or perhaps a miscompilation by clang.
Just hypothesizing out loud.
It seems to be miscompilation (as Soekris
Hi all,
I've finally patched my 8.2 IPv6 gateway with the RDNSS/DNSSL patches
and I'm distributing DNS servers that way now. Works fine, my box
running CURRENT picks up the DNS servers and search domains and writes
them into /etc/resolv.conf using the resolvconf script.
The script anyhow
On 08/04/2011 22:59, Mattia Rossi wrote:
Hi all,
I've finally patched my 8.2 IPv6 gateway with the RDNSS/DNSSL patches
and I'm distributing DNS servers that way now. Works fine, my box
running CURRENT picks up the DNS servers and search domains and writes
them into /etc/resolv.conf using
I agree to Kostik's approach, but I suggest implementing it in a
separate function and also use for the unmount() part.
Please review attached patch.
On 04.08.2011 15:59, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:54:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
I've only seen this on my laptop;
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:18:49AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
I agree to Kostik's approach, but I suggest implementing it in a
separate function and also use for the unmount() part.
Please review attached patch.
Since you are moving the fragment to a function, you may somewhat reduce
the
Hi
Since CURRENT Aug 2, my machine has hardlocked at boot time on
Mounting local filesystems. I traced it this morning to
fdesc /dev/fd fdescfs rw 0 0
Not mounting this stopped the hardlock. I added it because one
installed port requeried it, but I can't
Patch updated.
On 05.08.2011 10:26, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:18:49AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
I agree to Kostik's approach, but I suggest implementing it in a
separate function and also use for the unmount() part.
Please review attached patch.
Since you are
2011/8/5 Pawel Worach pawel.wor...@gmail.com:
On Aug 1, 2011, at 14:24, Test Rat wrote:
Anyone else? I can still reproduce with trunk r136607.
boot and gptboot seem to be unaffected.
IIRC, with previous clang import it just stuck during boot
without any error messages.
A workaround for
Hello Olivier,
Thank you very for your work.
Using the path I have successfully rebuild, install and boot my system.
Regards,
Christoph
On Aug 5, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/8/5 Pawel Worach pawel.wor...@gmail.com:
On Aug 1, 2011, at 14:24, Test Rat wrote:
Anyone
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:52:54 -0700, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 08/04/2011 22:59, Mattia Rossi wrote:
I've finally patched my 8.2 IPv6 gateway with the RDNSS/DNSSL patches
The script anyhow overwrites my previous manual entries in
/etc/resolv.conf which I need for my manual
On 2011-08-05 11:45, Olivier Smedts wrote:
...
A workaround for the hang on boot and error 1 lba X failures is the following
patch, it would be interesting if it also makes the zfs_alloc/free error go away too.
Yes, it solved the ZFS: zfs_alloc()/zfs_free() mismatch error when
gptzfsboot-ing
On 2011-08-05 02:17, Pawel Worach wrote:
...
A workaround for the hang on boot and error 1 lba X failures is the following
patch, it would be interesting if it also makes the zfs_alloc/free error go away too.
...
dim@ has filed an upstream bug, http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10591
Am 05.08.2011 10:33 (UTC+1) schrieb Ian FREISLICH:
Hi
Since CURRENT Aug 2, my machine has hardlocked at boot time on
Mounting local filesystems. I traced it this morning to
fdesc /dev/fd fdescfs rw 0 0
Not mounting this stopped the hardlock. I added it
On Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:26:49 pm Christoph Hoffmann wrote:
Hello Everyone,
The system will successfully boot only if the OS installation is laying on
the second drive or higher (0x81 and more).
Are you using clang? If so, you should try either using GCC or using this
patch with
Hello John,
No, I and not using clang.
My problem persists even I apply the patch.
As a workaround I have to put OS on second LUN presented by the
P410i Controller.
Regards,
Christoph
--
Christoph Hoffmann
On Aug 5, 2011, at 1:37 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, August 04, 2011
Victor Detoni wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high perfomance network with pf. My
server configuration is:
Dell 1950
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5130 @ 2.00GHz (1995.03-MHz K8-class
CPU)
4 x CPU
2 NIC (Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T)
1 NIC (em0:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:43:32AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
Patch updated.
...
OK; after reverting kern/vfs_mount.c to its pre-patched status on
my laptop, I applied this most recent patch without incident; it
built boots fine, which is now running:
FreeBSD g1-222.catwhisker.org.
On 8/4/2011 9:59 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
hail,
any info on what port multiplier I could buy to make the 4 port Sil3124 at
least make up to 8 ?
I have used a number of PMs from http://www.addonics.com/. 8.x works great.
eg.
# camcontrol devlist
WDC WD1001FALS-00J7B1 05.00K05 at scbus0
Hello Everyone,
Despite the BIOS information about the nonexistent floppy, the zfsboot.c code
will prevent to boot from the first HDD if a floppy is given as a first
available device.
The drive 0x0 (floppy) will be probed before the code below and an error occurs:
[…]
gptzfsboot: error 1 lba
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:28:19PM +0200, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Friday, August 05, 2011 02:27:33 AM Luigi Rizzo wrote:
if you feel like doing a bit of coding yourself, you could try netmap
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/
Out of curiosity, will this code be integrated in
on 05/08/2011 17:56 Luigi Rizzo said the following:
i asked permission to re@ to integrate it in 9.0 but it was considered
a bit premature.
However i am not too worried because the system dependencies are
minimal and it changes no API/ABI or internal data structure so
it is easy to add it at
On Friday, August 05, 2011 02:27:33 AM Luigi Rizzo wrote:
if you feel like doing a bit of coding yourself, you could try netmap
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/
Out of curiosity, will this code be integrated in FreeBSD? Because it seems
really useful and a lot of programs might
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/08/2011 17:56 Luigi Rizzo said the following:
i asked permission to re@ to integrate it in 9.0 but it was considered
a bit premature.
However i am not too worried because the system dependencies are
minimal and it
on 05/08/2011 18:23 Vlad Galu said the following:
Netmap's scope may be narrow, but it's a great alternative to
proprietary implementations that are provided by only a handful of
vendors and tied to their hardware. I don't think Luigi foresees lots
of users either, but having it in the base
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/08/2011 18:23 Vlad Galu said the following:
Netmap's scope may be narrow, but it's a great alternative to
proprietary implementations that are provided by only a handful of
vendors and tied to their hardware. I don't
On Friday 05 August 2011 04:33 am, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Hi
Since CURRENT Aug 2, my machine has hardlocked at boot time on
Mounting local filesystems. I traced it this morning to
fdesc /dev/fd fdescfs rw 0 0
Not mounting this stopped the hardlock. I
on 05/08/2011 18:40 Vlad Galu said the following:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 05/08/2011 18:23 Vlad Galu said the following:
Netmap's scope may be narrow, but it's a great alternative to
proprietary implementations that are provided by only a handful
On Friday 05 August 2011 11:41 am, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Friday 05 August 2011 04:33 am, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Hi
Since CURRENT Aug 2, my machine has hardlocked at boot time on
Mounting local filesystems. I traced it this morning to
fdesc /dev/fd fdescfs rw
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 06:34:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/08/2011 18:23 Vlad Galu said the following:
Netmap's scope may be narrow, but it's a great alternative to
proprietary implementations that are provided by only a handful of
vendors and tied to their hardware. I don't think
I netbooted 9.0 Beta and was going to try and install the system onto a
raid1 mirror built with graid. However, neither sysinstall nor
bsdinstall see it fully
I have the box netbooted (Intel Matrix raid)
i5# graid status -ags
Intel-a5bbf622 OPTIMAL ada0 (ACTIVE (ACTIVE))
Intel-a5bbf622
On 2011-08-03, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:44:23PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
devfs_populate(), and the context holds only dm-dm_lock in
devfs_populate().
On the other hand, devfs_generation is incremented in devfs_create()
and devfs_destroy() the context
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:03:22PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:28:34PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:36:01AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/02/11 04:41, Bruce Cran wrote:
I've been trying out 9.0-BETA1: it's a lot easier to
Oh, wow! Great news! It's much more than I expected.
Unfortunately I am too far from the Bay Area.
on 05/08/2011 19:12 Luigi Rizzo said the following:
Its the latter. The libpcap-over-netmap code has been there for
a while, but documentation was not completely up to date so
we are both at
2011/8/5 Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net
On 8/4/2011 9:59 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
hail,
any info on what port multiplier I could buy to make the 4 port Sil3124
at
least make up to 8 ?
speaking about PM, does anybody already tried new usb3 pm ?
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 06:45:22PM +0300, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
On 2011-08-03, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:44:23PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
devfs_populate(), and the context holds only dm-dm_lock in
devfs_populate().
On the other hand, devfs_generation
On 8/5/2011 12:01 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
and mount it. However, speeds seem a bit slow, but I am not sure if
thats to be expected.
i5# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test bs=1024k count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 13.996080 secs (7491926 bytes/sec)
i5#
Hi all,
The day before yesterday I upgraded a server of mine at Hetzner to
FreeBSD 9. It seems to use an MSI X58 Pro-E motherboard, having an ICH10
SATA-controller.
It seems that under high load, I get timeouts on the SATA controller. It
seems disabling MSI has no effect. Unfortunately it's a
I am running FreeBSD 9-Beta1 (csup from July 31) and I had a Fatal trap 9
in __mnt_vnode_next:
(transcribed from a picture)
Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id =00
instruction pointer = 0x20:0x8086d790
stack pointer =
Hi Luigi,
Thanks for reply. That's great solution :) Will be integrated with pf or is
it?
Thanks,
Victor
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:39:17PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high
I have installed 9-Beta1 using the new installation tool and I am
generally happy with it.
The new dialog cause me to need a few more key-strokes because I was
so used to the
old behavior, but it really is more intuitive and I would not want to
see the old behavior
restored. I'll get used to it
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:07:22PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote:
Hi Luigi,
Thanks for reply. That's great solution :) Will be integrated with pf or is
it?
unfortunately i don't have the time to do it, but as said
in the thread it should not be terribly difficult.
cheers
luigi
Thanks,
I'm running kde on both and 7.4 works equally well with ttys and with
kde4-4.6.5.
My FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 works with ttys but not even close with kde4-4.6.5.
Is this me or could it be kde or Current? There doesn't seem to be
any changes in the language files spanish.iso.acc.kbd, for example.
Ed,
First off, thanks for taking a look at this. I've always been
uncomfortable with our default nsswitch.conf file because most users do
not use nis, and although everything works with our (previous) default
it produces errors in the logs that are very non-obvious.
That said, I think the
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:07:22PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote:
Hi Luigi,
Thanks for reply. That's great solution :) Will be integrated with pf or
is
it?
unfortunately i don't have the time to do it, but as said
in
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
I have installed 9-Beta1 using the new installation tool and I am
generally happy with it.
The new dialog cause me to need a few more key-strokes because I was
so used to the
old behavior, but it really is more intuitive
45 matches
Mail list logo
