Dnia niedziela, 27 listopada 2011 19:59:44 ZaRiuS KRiNG pisze:
> Hi! is my first post here and have a little problem try to google some and
> don't find any of value.
>
> A week ago compile the src of current, and after that in any new port i
> install, if compile before any lib, don't work, i nee
> On 11/27/11, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > "b. f." writes:
> >>> > > What is the role of "options atapicam" and "device ATA_CAM" in kernel
> >>> > > config file?
> >>> > > Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but
> >>> > > will it make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM deprec
on 28/11/2011 02:59 Ryan Stone said the following:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> Looks like clang has found a real issue here:
>> /usr/src/sys/x86/x86/local_apic.c:311:2: warning: array index of '-16'
>> indexes
>> before the beginning of the array [-Warray-bounds]
Hello!
Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
default?
They are of no use for 100% users and 99,999% developers and just slow down
world and universe builds.
Here are the results of running buildworld on 1 core on AMD Athlon(tm) 64
X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+:
m
> Now I think I'll try to rebuild the kernel with "options ATA_CAM" and drop
> "device atapicam".
>
> This question needs to be better resolved in time for FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE.
>
> I cross-post this message to freebsd-current@freebsd.org so the developers
> will see it. FreeBSD users want to be ab
On 24/11/2011 18:06, Mark Martinec wrote:
If you can get it back into this state,
Sure, *every* time.
a procstat -k -k would be very helpful.
(the second -k is not a typo).
# procstat -k -k 5896
PIDTID COMM TDNAME KSTACK
5896 102364 iscontrol-
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:20:01PM -0600, Mark Felder wrote:
> 13:14:32 nas:~ > uname -a
> FreeBSD nas.feld.me 9.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE #3 r227971M:
> Fri Nov 25 10:07:48 CST 2011
> r...@nas.feld.me:/usr/obj/tank/svn/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
> This seemed to start happening sometime
Hello Jason,
* Jason Edwards , 2027 22:15:
> Thanks for the impressive list of advantages! There's just one
> non-critical issue I'd like to address regarding the use of xterm
> terminal type.
>
> When using cons25 terminal, the dialog menus (drawn using
> devel/cdialog and `make config` in p
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:20:01PM -0600, Mark Felder wrote:
> > 13:14:32 nas:~ > uname -a
> > FreeBSD nas.feld.me 9.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE #3
> > r227971M:
> > Fri Nov 25 10:07:48 CST 2011
> > r...@nas.feld.me:/usr/obj/tank/svn/sys/GENERIC amd64
> >
> > Th
TB --- 2011-11-28 13:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-28 13:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-11-28 13:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-28 13:40:55 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-28 13:40:55 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:42:45 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:42:45 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:42:45 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:42:55 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:42:55 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:34:43 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:34:43 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:34:43 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:35:01 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-11-28 15:35:01 - /usr/bin/c
Ok, the second know how make, but the first no.
How can set new uname -r in the environment? Sorry but in some things need
a lot of experience, and for that try use current
About what programs got the fail? Chromium and Abiword, with one, 2-3 with
second just one. But make that, pkg_add -r and co
Am 11/27/11 22:05, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:01 AM, O. Hartmann
> wrote:
>> Sources of FreeBSD 10.0-CUR/amd64 as svn-ed recently:
>>
>> Path: .
>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head
>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base
>> Re
> Oh, and don't hesitate to try NFSv4. It should do the locking correctly
> without
> needing "nolockd" and the more testing it gets, the better.;-)
>
> rick
>
> > Removing soft,intr had no effect. This, I suspect will be problematic
> > for clusteradm@ if we start updating hosts in the cluster
Dnia poniedziałek, 28 listopada 2011 18:55:04 ZaRiuS KRiNG pisze:
> Ok, the second know how make, but the first no.
>
> How can set new uname -r in the environment? Sorry but in some things need
> a lot of experience, and for that try use current
>
> About what programs got the fail? Chromium and
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Am 11/27/11 22:05, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:01 AM, O. Hartmann
>> wrote:
>>> Sources of FreeBSD 10.0-CUR/amd64 as svn-ed recently:
>>>
>>> Path: .
>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org
On 2011.11.27. 12:07, Jan Beich wrote:
Oops, here is a diff. Non -l/-L case still seems to be broken.
$ echo t>a; echo t>b; echo t>c
$ gnugrep --null . ? | vis
a\^@t
b\^@t
c\^@t
$ bsdgrep --null . ? | vis
a\^@:t
b\^@:t
c\^@:t
Thanks Jan, I've just committed this and y
On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 10:07:52 pm John Nielsen wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:26 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Monday, November 21, 2011 1:45:36 pm John Nielsen wrote:
> >> This weekend I downloaded the Freebsd 9.0 RC2 amd64 ISO image and burned
> >> it
> > to a DVD. I have a comput
Am 11/28/11 20:10, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM, O. Hartmann
> wrote:
>> Am 11/27/11 22:05, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:01 AM, O. Hartmann
>>> wrote:
Sources of FreeBSD 10.0-CUR/amd64 as svn-ed recently:
Path: .
Working C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/23/11 16:26, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Problem: the iscontrol process starts normally and establishes a
> session and brings up a device, but it cannot be stopped. It does
> not react to a HUP signal, and neither to KILL.
>
> The /dev/da0 device
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:59 PM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Am 11/28/11 20:10, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM, O. Hartmann
>> wrote:
>>> Am 11/27/11 22:05, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:01 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Sources of FreeBSD 10.0-C
Am 11/28/11 21:23, schrieb Gábor Kövesdán:
> On 2011.11.27. 12:07, Jan Beich wrote:
>> Oops, here is a diff. Non -l/-L case still seems to be broken.
>>
>>$ echo t>a; echo t>b; echo t>c
>>$ gnugrep --null . ? | vis
>>a\^@t
>>b\^@t
>>c\^@t
>>
>>$ bsdgrep --null . ? | vis
>>
Hi Glebius,
On Friday 25 November 2011 15:32:58 Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:19:35PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> T> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:28:51AM +0100, Daan Vreeken wrote:
> T> D> Recently I've discovered a bug in if_clone.c and if.c where the code
> allows T> D> multi
On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote:
> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
> default?
Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new
system for at least a decade.
Ideally we could do this for 9.0.
Doug
--
"We could
In message <4ed4222e.5010...@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton writes:
>On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote:
>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
>> default?
>
>Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new
>system for at least a decade.
>
>
On 11/28/2011 16:33, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <4ed4222e.5010...@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton writes:
>> On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote:
>
>>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
>>> default?
>>
>> Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable
Hello everyone,
First a quick introduction, then my project, then my problem.
==My FreeBSD involvement==
I've been dabbling with FreeBSD since I set up stokes.ca at pair.com over
a decade ago. I liked the service at Pair, so I installed FreeBSD at home
on a spare box. One of those evil Fujits
Doug,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
> >>> default?
> >>
> >> Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new
> >> system for at least a decade.
> >>
> >> Ideally we could do
Hello!
It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
after r228114.
The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
1) just build & link gdb with libedit
OR
2) re-import libreadline from gdb sources and build INTERNALLIB version of
it that is never installed an
Am Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:49:50 -0800
schrieb al...@stokes.ca:
> Hello everyone,
Hi,
(I'll shorten this a bit, because I don't have opinions on everything
you wrote)
> I'm either not brave enough or insane enough to put my FreeBSD system
> volume onto the ZFS mirror, as much as that seems kind of
31 matches
Mail list logo
