On 31 May 2012 08:45, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
I do think we should provide something in ports as an interim solution.
There are other 3rd party applications looking to drop FreeBSD support
because we are missing APIs that almost all other OS's have. I'm fine
if the interim lives
I do think we should provide something in ports as an interim solution.
There are other 3rd party applications looking to drop FreeBSD support
because we are missing APIs that almost all other OS's have. I'm fine
if the interim lives in ports and that we don't import substandard
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:00:08PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 7:17:01 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:08:24PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 21, 2012 5:45:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:42:17AM +0100,
Do we have a wiki page listing the functions in libm we are missing?
Having some kind of place to track progress and figure out what
exactly is needed is the first step to getting these APIs into shape.
I already suggested this, and mentioned:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/MissingMathStuff
Also,
Hello all.
First of all, I'm not on current, but on stable:
FreeBSD pcbsd-6648 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #8: Fri May 18
16:12:29 UTC 2012
r...@build9x64.pcbsd.org:/usr/obj/builds/i386/pcbsd-build90/fbsd-source/9.0/sys/GENERIC
i386
I have lenovo s10-2 (which is have some unsupported broadcom
Hi,
Please file a bug. :)
WEP shouldn't be broken in 9.x, that was before all of my TX
aggregation changes for 802.11n support.
WEP worked fine for me when I was using it a couple weeks ago. Would
you please provide further information in the bug, such as what the
key length is, which key slots
2012/6/1 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org:
Hi,
Please file a bug. :)
Here it goes:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=168530
WEP shouldn't be broken in 9.x, that was before all of my TX
aggregation changes for 802.11n support.
Don't know if it is... since my other stuff working in
On Friday, June 01, 2012 1:55:10 am Eitan Adler wrote:
On 31 May 2012 08:45, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
I do think we should provide something in ports as an interim solution.
There are other 3rd party applications looking to drop FreeBSD support
because we are missing APIs that
On 2012-05-28 1:25, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Here's a revised patch (based on something I brought up earlier)
that converts periodic over to an rc.subr-like paradigm.
This can be directly applied to HEAD; you will need to backport
r231849 first if you want to apply the patch to 9-STABLE,
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 07:20:42 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2012-May-30 13:27:03 +1000, Peter Jeremy pe...@rulingia.com wrote:
On 2012-May-29 02:18:25 +0400, Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru wrote:
Then you should try to profile it - my script basically runs
delete-old delete-old-libs for
On 2012-Jun-01 20:50:24 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote:
Why is xargs even calling /bin/echo when utility is not specified.
Because that's what it's documented as doing.
Shouldn't it just print a certain number of arguments (one in this
case)?
The current approach is simpler -
On 2012-Jun-01 10:29:13 -0400, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, June 01, 2012 1:55:10 am Eitan Adler wrote:
Also, are there BSD licensed naive implementations of these functions
we can use? Would it be okay to has slow, but accurate versions of
these functions as a stopgap?
On 1 June 2012 17:03, Peter Jeremy pe...@rulingia.com wrote:
On 2012-Jun-01 10:29:13 -0400, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, June 01, 2012 1:55:10 am Eitan Adler wrote:
Also, are there BSD licensed naive implementations of these functions
we can use? Would it be okay to has slow,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:16:03PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 June 2012 17:03, Peter Jeremy pe...@rulingia.com wrote:
On 2012-Jun-01 10:29:13 -0400, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, June 01, 2012 1:55:10 am Eitan Adler wrote:
Also, are there BSD licensed naive
On 1 June 2012 23:52, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
Of course. Sit down and write code.
If I ever find the time, I just might. Do we have a wiki page listing
the set of functions which we don't yet have?
--
Eitan Adler
___
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:04:58AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 June 2012 23:52, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
Of course. ??Sit down and write code.
If I ever find the time, I just might. Do we have a wiki page listing
the set of functions which we don't yet have?
16 matches
Mail list logo
