r258446 built, installed and booted fine. I'll try a more recent i386
in a chroot soon.
Would someone please double-check -HEAD on i386 and see if it's ok?
Thanks,
-adrian
On 21 November 2013 19:23, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> hi,
>
> I just updated a laptop from a month old -HEAD to the latest -HE
- Original Message
From: Adrian Chadd
To: freebsd-current
Subject: Re: i386 update to latest -HEAD broke things
Date: 22/11/13 10:05
> r258446 built, installed and booted fine. I'll try a more recent i386
> in a chroot soon.
>
> Would someone please double-check -HEAD on i386 a
On 22 November 2013 01:11, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> - Original Message
> From: Adrian Chadd
> To: freebsd-current
> Subject: Re: i386 update to latest -HEAD broke things
> Date: 22/11/13 10:05
>
>> r258446 built, installed and booted fine. I'll try a more recent i386
>> in a chro
from O. Hartmann:
> Recently,
> I stumbled into this board, which looks promising:
> http://www.viaspringboard.com/products.html
> Does anybody know whether the offered hardware (chipse, CPU, WiFi
> chipset) is supported by FreeBSD?
I went to that URL and noticed that the WiFi chip was Atheros
Hello,
2013/11/14 Herbert J. Skuhra
>
> to. 14. nov. 2013 kl. 11.02 +0100 skrev Olivier Smedts:
>
>
> Hello,
>>
>> cc'ing glebius since he committed r257694 ("Remove remnants of BIND from
>> /etc, since there is no BIND in base now.") which removed remnants of BIND
>> from /etc but not from /us
On 22 Nov 2013, at 04:23, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I just updated a laptop from a month old -HEAD to the latest -HEAD.
> Things .. didn't work.
>
> * No processes ran - they'd complain about being out of anonymous memory
> * /rescue/sh works fine, but /rescue/dhclient seems to be doing the
> wrong t
Hello,
I've updated the branch one more time in order to cope with the recent
HEAD changes regarding SMAP parsing, as usual the branch can be found at:
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/royger/freebsd.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pvh_v5
Also, I've created a wiki page that describes how to s
Hi,
am I doing something wrong, ZFS does not support that or there is a bug that
zvol clone does not show up under /dev/zvol after creating it from other zvol
snapshot?
# zfs list -t all | grep local
local 136G 76.8G 144K none
local/home
