Re: [review] sendfile / sendfile_sync refactoring

2013-11-28 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:36:44AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > Here's part #2 in my sendfile refactoring. This is a little more > intrusive than the first patch. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/netflix/20131126-sendfile-sync-refactor-2.diff > sf_buf.h is for sf buffers, and not fo

Re: Feature request: sticky bit inheritance

2013-11-28 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Bezüglich Julian Elischer's Nachricht vom 28.11.2013 01:05 (localtime): > On 11/28/13, 12:17 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: >> Bezüglich Julian Elischer's Nachricht vom 27.11.2013 16:20 >> (localtime): >>> On 11/27/13, 8:03 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, ever since I too

Re: [review] sendfile / sendfile_sync refactoring

2013-11-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, It's definitely a work in progress, as you've observed. On 28 November 2013 00:20, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:36:44AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here's part #2 in my sendfile refactoring. This is a little more >> intrusive than the first patch. >> >>

Re: [HEADSUP!!!] do not upgrade to or past r258632 if you use ZFS + TRIM

2013-11-28 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 27/11/2013 18:17 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 26/11/2013 11:57 Andriy Gapon said the following: >> Author: avg >> Date: Tue Nov 26 09:57:14 2013 >> New Revision: 258632 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/258632 >> >> Log: >> MFV r255255: 4045 zfs write throttle & i/o sch

Re: panic: double fault with 11.0-CURRENT r258504

2013-11-28 Thread Don Lewis
On 28 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:11:35PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: >> >> On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:02:57AM -0800, D

Re: panic: double fault with 11.0-CURRENT r258504

2013-11-28 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:56:37AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: > I haven't figured out how to find the currently installed BIOS version. > The motherboard is Abit, which is no more, but I found an archive of all > of their downloads. I'll also check into updates from the Linux world. I reviewed the 0x

Re: panic: double fault with 11.0-CURRENT r258504

2013-11-28 Thread Peter Holm
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:56:10AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:11:35PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: > > >> On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > >> > On Wed,

Re: panic: double fault with 11.0-CURRENT r258504

2013-11-28 Thread Don Lewis
On 28 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:56:37AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: >> I haven't figured out how to find the currently installed BIOS version. >> The motherboard is Abit, which is no more, but I found an archive of all >> of their downloads. I'll also check into upda

[RFC] how to get the size of a malloc(9) block ?

2013-11-28 Thread Luigi Rizzo
in porting some linux kernel code to FreeBSD we stumbled upon ksize(), which returns the actual size of a kmalloc() block. We could easily implement it as the first part of realloc(9) -- see kern/kern_malloc.c Would it make sense to add this to the malloc(9) API ? The userspace equivalent seems t

Re: [RFC] how to get the size of a malloc(9) block ?

2013-11-28 Thread jb
Luigi Rizzo iet.unipi.it> writes: > > in porting some linux kernel code to FreeBSD we > stumbled upon ksize(), which returns the > actual size of a kmalloc() block. > > We could easily implement it as the first part > of realloc(9) -- see kern/kern_malloc.c > > Would it make sense to add this

Re: [RFC] how to get the size of a malloc(9) block ?

2013-11-28 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 01:33:41PM +, jb wrote: > Luigi Rizzo iet.unipi.it> writes: > > > > > in porting some linux kernel code to FreeBSD we > > stumbled upon ksize(), which returns the > > actual size of a kmalloc() block. > > > > We could easily implement it as the first part > > of real

Re: [RFC] how to get the size of a malloc(9) block ?

2013-11-28 Thread jb
Luigi Rizzo iet.unipi.it> writes: > ... > But I don't understand why you find ksize()/malloc_usable_size() dangerous. > ... The original crime is commited when *usable size* (an implementation detail) is exported (leaked) to the caller. To be blunt, when a caller requests memory of certain size

Re: lang/gcc not build

2013-11-28 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
26.11.2013 19:47, Alexander Panyushkin wrote: #portmaster lang/gcc [...] cd /usr/ports/lang/gcc/work/gcc-4.6.4 ; contrib/gcc_update --touch configure: loading site script /usr/ports/Templates/config.site checking build system type... x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.0 checking host system type... x86_64-

problems with pkg2ng

2013-11-28 Thread Nilton Jose Rizzo
Hi all, in the near past, when I update ports repository via svn, I always use pkg2ng to upgrade (or update?) the database, but today I can not do it. The command pkg2ng show this error message: root@valfenda:/home2/rizzo # pkg2ng pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please c

problems with pkg2ng

2013-11-28 Thread Nilton Jose Rizzo
Hi all, in the near past, when I update ports repository via svn, I always use pkg2ng to upgrade (or update?) the database, but today I can not do it. The command pkg2ng show this error message: root@valfenda:/home2/rizzo # pkg2ng pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please

request for help: MFC net80211 fixes from -HEAD to -10

2013-11-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
hi all, I'd like a developer or two to organise the MFC of anything that's in net80211 on -HEAD back to -10 before 10.0-REL. There's a few critical fixes that need to go in but I just don't have the time to do it myself. :( Thanks! -adrian ___ free

Re: request for help: MFC net80211 fixes from -HEAD to -10

2013-11-28 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 06:54:56PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I'd like a developer or two to organise the MFC of anything that's in > net80211 on -HEAD back to -10 before 10.0-REL. > > There's a few critical fixes that need to go in but I just don't have > the time to do it myself. :( Depending

Re: request for help: MFC net80211 fixes from -HEAD to -10

2013-11-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 28 November 2013 19:04, Glen Barber wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 06:54:56PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> I'd like a developer or two to organise the MFC of anything that's in >> net80211 on -HEAD back to -10 before 10.0-REL. >> >> There's a few critical fixes that need to go in but I just

Re: problems with pkg2ng

2013-11-28 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:05:21PM -0300, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > > Hi all, > > in the near past, when I update ports repository via svn, I always use > pkg2ng to upgrade (or update?) the database, but today I can not do it. > > The command pkg2ng show this error message: > > r

Re: problems with pkg2ng

2013-11-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 29/11/2013 02:02, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > in the near past, when I update ports repository via svn, I always use > pkg2ng to upgrade (or update?) the database, but today I can not do it. Uh? pkg2ng is a one time thing. Its only use is when converting a system that had previously used