On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 06:41:05PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> No, this isn't a "the buffer is messed up", this is a "everything is
> and stays messed up."
>
> Starting new applications odes'nt fix it.
>
> Minimising/maximising the applications again doesn't fix it.
>
> This is a "the framebuff
Dear FreeBSD Community,
Please note that the submission date for the January to March
Quarterly Status Reports is, April 7th, 2014, about two weeks away.
Please consult my previous message for the details:
2014-03-08 10:24 GMT+01:00 Gabor Pali :
> They do not have to be very long -- basically the
Hello, Freebsd-current.
I've tried "440" with owner 25:25 and "mail l...@serebryakov.spb.ru"
complains, that it could not access them.
Also, what is proper way to attach dma into system instead of senndmal now?
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
___
On 2014-03-24 06:53, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
I've tried "440" with owner 25:25 and "mail l...@serebryakov.spb.ru"
complains, that it could not access them.
Also, what is proper way to attach dma into system instead of senndmal
now?
I'm not sure what the permissions
DMA should have a read access on both files, nothing more.
--
Ben
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On 2014-03-24 06:53, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>
>> Hello, Freebsd-current.
>>
>> I've tried "440" with owner 25:25 and "mail l...@serebryakov.spb.ru"
>> complains, that it cou
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 07:16 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> On 2014-03-24 06:53, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > Hello, Freebsd-current.
> >
> > I've tried "440" with owner 25:25 and "mail l...@serebryakov.spb.ru"
> > complains, that it could not access them.
> >
> > Also, what is proper way to attach d
Hello, Benjamin.
You wrote 24 марта 2014 г., 16:48:55:
BV> DMA should have a read access on both files, nothing more.
Question is: from which user it will be run?
Give "/etc/dma/auth.conf" world-read doesn't seen to be good idea!
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
_
Dear FreeBSD friends,
Lately I have setup a new FreeBSD server with 10.0-STABLE. Most of it went
smoothly. However I have an issue with sendmail. Some of the mails can be
sent out correctly, some of them stay in /var/spool/mqueue/. The provided
error messages are in the latter case:
Mar 24 14:16:
Hi Lev,
You can set the owner of conf files to root:mail and give read access only
to the mail group.
Regards,
--
Ben
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Benjamin.
> You wrote 24 марта 2014 г., 16:48:55:
>
>
> BV> DMA should have a read access on both files, nothi
Dear FreeBSD friends,
Is there a way to downgrade sendmail to Version 8.14.5?
--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
With kind regards,
Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
De jrus wah,
Wiel
*
W.K. Offermans
___
freebsd-current@freeb
Dear FreeBSD friends,
I used portdowngrade, but compiling sendmail 8.14.5 throws an error
message. So this is not a way to go!
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:23:16PM +0100, Willy Offermans wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD friends,
>
> Is there a way to downgrade sendmail to Version 8.14.5?
>
> --
> Met vrie
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014, Willy Offermans wrote:
> Is there a way to downgrade sendmail to Version 8.14.5?
Why would you want to do that?
Compiling the source code would be my preferred method...
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
On 2014-03-24 10:47, Willy Offermans wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD friends,
>
> I used portdowngrade, but compiling sendmail 8.14.5 throws an error
> message. So this is not a way to go!
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:23:16PM +0100, Willy Offermans wrote:
>> Dear FreeBSD friends,
>>
>> Is there a way
On 2014-03-21 11:53, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:34:04 +
> Mike C. wrote:
>
>> I was actually googling about this yesterday and found no more info
>> then the thread you posted.
>>
>> So its seems that nothing was done related to this so far?
>>
>> Which means using trim+geli is probl
As I mention the laptop has TWO drives: 1 HDD and 1 SSD, which was why I
wanted to try this setup.
But firstly I don't wan't geli+trim so I use the full HDD with zfs+geli,
which means the SSD would be unused!
Before this setup I was using the SSD for the "system" with UFS+trim+geli,
but later I f
On 2014-03-24 13:41, Miguel Clara wrote:
> As I mention the laptop has TWO drives: 1 HDD and 1 SSD, which was why I
> wanted to try this setup.
>
> But firstly I don't wan't geli+trim so I use the full HDD with zfs+geli,
> which means the SSD would be unused!
>
> Before this setup I was using the
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014, Willy Offermans wrote:
> Mar 24 14:16:01 MyServer sm-mta[11725]: s2ODCWT4011717: SYSERR(root): timeout
> writing message to MyProvider.com: Broken pipe
> Mar 24 14:16:01 MyServer sm-mta[11725]: s2ODCWT4011717:
> to=, delay=00:03:29, xdelay=00:03:26, mailer=relay,
> pri=128
Willy Offermans wrote this message on Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 14:36 +0100:
> Dear FreeBSD friends,
>
> Lately I have setup a new FreeBSD server with 10.0-STABLE. Most of it went
> smoothly. However I have an issue with sendmail. Some of the mails can be
> sent out correctly, some of them stay in /var
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 02:36:34PM +0100, Willy Offermans wrote:
> ...
> Since there is a timeout error, I like to know what sendmail is writing to
> MyProvider.com
>
> Is there a way to debug sendmail to disclose the message written to
> MyProvider.com and the response from MyProvider.com. I'm pr
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 07:05:10AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 07:16 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> > On 2014-03-24 06:53, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > > Hello, Freebsd-current.
> > >
> > > I've tried "440" with owner 25:25 and "mail l...@serebryakov.spb.ru"
> > > complains, that
20 matches
Mail list logo
